June 2009

There’s a weird behavior going around, and I have to say, I think I’ve only seen it in people under 30.

We have a specific time scheduled for a phone interview. I call you at that exact time, precisely on the dot because I’m neurotic that way.

You answer after quite a few rings and sound like you’re genuinely curious to hear who might be on the other end.

I identify myself and you say something like “Oh … hi” with a distinct tone in your voice that really sounds like you weren’t fully prepared to hear me on the other end of the phone.

More experienced candidates don’t do this. Good interview or bad, they generally at least sound prepared from the minute they answer the phone.

Why are younger candidates doing this? It’s as if they think it’s some kind of charade where we pretend I just happen to be calling them unexpectedly. And it is very strange.

{ 40 comments }

The vast majority of resumes I see read like a series of job descriptions, listing duties and responsibilities at each position the job applicant has held.

But resumes that stand out do something very different. Rather than just providing the job description, for each position they instead answer the question: What did you accomplish in this job that someone else wouldn’t have?

Over at U.S. News & World Report today, I explain how to do it. Please check it out!

{ 1 comment }

A reader writes:

I am trying to find out how long, on average, it would take for a company to check my three references they requested. I have recently checked in with all my references and none has heard anything from that company (no call, email, any contact). It’s been three weeks since I forwarded their details to the new employer.

To make things even more frustrating, when asked for an update, the person responsible for checking the references, who is also the person who interviewed me, indicated she has not managed to contact “all my references,” implying that they did some. I further heard through the grapevine that she indicated in a meeting with the existing team staff, including the hiring manager, that the “reference” they did do was “lukewarm.”

I am totally confused. It is obvious that she did not want me hired, but she could easily have done that by just saying my interview was not that great. What do you make of this?

It certainly doesn’t take three weeks to check three references, if you’re at all motivated to do it. It usually takes a day or two to check references, assuming the references return your calls quickly (and if they don’t, that itself can say something).

There are a few possibilities of what’s going on here:

1. The person in charge of checking references is lazy and not doing her job.
2. The person in charge of checking references (and/or the rest of the hiring team) isn’t that interested in hiring you, but isn’t competent enough to just tell you that straightforwardly.
3. Some or all of your references actually were contacted but since they aren’t giving you a great reference are finding it easier to tell you that they weren’t, rather than deal with the uncomfortable situation of explaining that they didn’t have great things to say.

You can’t fully control any of these situations, but you can mitigate all of them. Here’s what you should do: Email the hiring manager (not the person in charge of checking your references) and ask for a status update. Mention that your references all told you that they have not yet been contacted, and politely ask what sort of timeline the company is working with, both for when your references might be contacted and when you should expect a decision.

Also, are you very sure that all your references will speak glowingly of you? If you have any doubt at all, you should check in with them and make sure these are the correct choices to offer up as references. Being polite and non-defensive, of course, make it clear that you would never want to influence a reference they give for you, but that you’d also rather not supply references who don’t feel they can speak glowingly toward your work. Assure them that if they don’t feel they’re best suited to serve as a reference for you, they can simply let you know that, without any hard feelings. Make it easy for them to opt out. This is a good thing to do with your references as a matter of course, not just in situations like this.

Good luck!

{ 8 comments }

A reader writes:

I had an interesting experience with a company a few weeks ago that I felt handled the job interviewing process a bit sloppily, something a lot friends who are also unemployed and interviewing are noticing these days.

The interview with the hiring manager went well. In fact, the following day I got a voicemail from HR recruiter asking for references. I knew that that the manager wanted to make a decision quickly (recruiter told me), but I was kind of surprised that there were no additional rounds of interviews, since the team consisted of 10+ people.

This is kind of a red flag for me since I’d like to know more about my future peers and the company culture. Also on their end, is the hiring decision based on one person only?
Seem strange?

In addition, based on a couple of incidences, I knew the HR person was either lazy or extremely busy. But she emailed me the job offer later that week. No phone call that one was even being extended to me! It was a day or two before I realized it was sitting in my inbox. I should note that email was our main way of communicating prior to this.

Is this the norm for companies these days — just email the job offer? I believe a verbal conversation or voice mail that one is coming is still a MUST. As a candidate, you want to hear the enthusiasm and sales pitch of a job offer.

What are your thoughts on my scenario? Should I hold this against the company?

An emailed job offer is a bad idea for a lot of reasons — you have no way of knowing the email was received, for one thing. And you want to hear the candidate’s reaction and get a sense of where they’re at with it. And you want to take that opportunity to express your enthusiasm for them. It’s an odd choice.

But is it a red flag? I’m not sure; it could just indicate an inexperienced or lazy HR rep, or an incredibly email-centric company. What do others think?

On the issue of there not being additional rounds of interviews and the decision being made just by one person: No, that’s not strange (assuming your one lone interview wasn’t just 15 minutes or something). Lots of employers do it that way. But if you feel you don’t have enough information to make a decision on the offer, now’s the time to ask your questions. Ask about the culture and anything else you’re wondering about. And if you really want to, you can certainly ask if you can meet or talk with some of the others you’d be working with. If the company balks at that, that’s the red flag.

Oh, and by the way — call the hiring manager to talk over the offer, not the HR rep. You’re clearly not getting a great feeling from the HR rep, and the hiring manager’s the one you’re going to be working with anyway. Good luck!

{ 16 comments }

A reader writes:

I have a question for you regarding being fired. The quick setup is that after several years in my profession, I accepted a management position at an expanding organization. After 6 weeks, I was fired for “not fitting in.” The meeting where I was fired was the first and only indication I received from my manager that my performance was anything other than exactly what he wanted.

I am not sure if I should put this position on my resume. I am actually proud of the work I did in that job but it’s probably unwise to draw attention to the fact that I was only there 6 weeks. I understand that if I had to complete a job application where I verify all information to be complete, I would include it, but what do you think about putting the position on a resume? Would a resume that showed a six week position as the most recent position pass your initial scan of resumes?

Don’t include it.

Here’s what goes through my mind when I see a six-week stint: “Is this … six weeks? Was she fired? Did she quit before even giving it a chance? Why is this even on her resume?”

If the rest of the application is good, this wouldn’t stop me from doing a phone interview, but it would absolutely be one of the questions I’d ask early on. And so then we’re talking about you being fired, which isn’t something insurmountable, but it’s really not worth taking the hit when you could have avoided the whole conversation and concerns it raises. It’s like deliberately putting a typo on your resume — there’s nothing good that’s going to come of it.

Also, six weeks isn’t long enough to have meaningful accomplishments of the sort that belong on a resume anyway. So there’s nothing here to be gained. Don’t include it.

{ 5 comments }

A reader writes:

We’re moving our offices, and I have been given a nice sunny one near my boss. However, I can have any office I want. Should I give up this office so I can be closer to my other colleagues, as well as nearer to the action? Or should I remain in the nice office, nearer the boss but out of the loop?

I don’t think there’s a right answer here. It depends on: what office you like better, whether being near your coworkers has any impact or is important to you, and whether being near your boss has any impact or is important to you. Personally, I’d take the nice office and find other ways to stay in the loop, but that’s 100% personal preference, based on a fondness for nice things.

That was easy.

{ 3 comments }

One of the most important types of capital you can build at work is a reputation for being highly credible. But it takes time to build it, and you can significantly undermine it through even a single bad move. Over at U.S. News & World Report today, I talk about how you can build unshakable credibility. Please check it out!

{ 1 comment }

A reader writes:

Like you, I work at a nonprofit. I am executive director and have a staff of two great employees.

I have a new employee who always uses a big word when a smaller word would do. I would not say a word except that it sometimes makes it hard to understand what she is trying to ask or tell you, because the larger word is not always the right word. For example, when she left today she told me she would finalize something Monday instead of finish it. I am afraid that it also confuses people when she is talking to them on the phone and explaining how our main program works. It’s a concept a lot of people have a hard time grasping anyway.

The touchy thing is how to get her to be more brief and use shorter words when talking to people on the phone. I do not hear her phone calls unless I happen to walk up to her cubicle as she is talking on the phone, but hear enough to know that she uses large words on the phone as well as in conversation and uses a lot more words than necessary to explain things. It has to confuse people she talks to because it confuses me. Today I walked up as she told one of our board members I had asked her to call and retrieve a credit card number we can use to guarantee a hotel reservation for a conference. I guess one example of always using a larger word would be to say individual rather than person.

I think she may have grown up around a good many country people who did not speak properly and is trying to overcompensate. She is a college graduate. Besides the fact that it is sometimes hard for me to understand what she is asking or telling me, I think it may hold back her career in the long run. We deal with members of the bar and it does help to speak well.

She rarely needs to write many letters that I do not sign before I can correct them and provide feedback because I write my own letters. However, I have been copied on a couple of her emails and they are not clear at all. I was going to tell her that her writing skills are a weakness and send her to a business writing community education class at a local college. I am not old but am amazed at the lack of writing skills people just a few years younger than me lack.

The trick is how to say something without sounding snooty. I grew up in a town smaller than the town she is from so am not coming at this from the perspective of a city person. I have stopped her sometimes when she has said, “I had went” instead of “I went or I had gone” and asked her what her English teacher would say about that in a lighthearted manner while saying that my teacher used to get me all the time for saying ain’t. She is very sweet and a hard worker. I just do not know how to address this without sounding overly picky. I may be overly picky though.

Hmmm. Actually, the examples you gave (“finalize” rather “finish” and “retrieve” rather than “get”) don’t seem all that egregious. “Individual” rather than “person” is a pet peeve of mine, but I’m just not sure you’ve got a major problem on your hands in this area, unless the problem is much worse than these examples imply.

However, since you said that you often have trouble understanding what she means, I’m going to assume that the problem is worse than these examples imply. So I’d address it straightforwardly, by saying something like, “I’ve noticed that you sometimes struggle to communicate what you want to say concisely and clearly, and sometimes it can lead to people being confused about what you’re telling them. For instance, I’ve noticed you tend to pick bigger words when a simpler one might get the point across better. And I’d also like to see you be more vigilant about using correct grammar, in order to present a more professional image to the people we work with. You have lots of potential here, but this is something we need to work on fixing because it’s something that could keep you from accomplishing all you otherwise could.”

Sending her to a business writing class could help things. And since you’ve noticed she has trouble clearly describing how your program works, and that’s something really important that she needs to be able to communicate clearly, work with her directly on that one — helping her to come up with a clear, concise description that she can use every time she needs to answer that question.

I don’t think you need to worry about this being snooty unless you’re secretly feeling snooty about it (in which case it may come across). Instead, you should see this as feedback like any other, and simply be straightforward and direct in giving it. Good luck!

{ 15 comments }

no, I will not

June 19, 2009

No, I will not write your resume objective for you. If you don’t know your objective, I certainly don’t, and anyway, I don’t even believe in resume objectives.

No, I will not give you the answer for your school paper. You should probably do some research.

No, I will not critique your resume for you. People charge hundreds of dollars to do that. (Actually, I do sometimes do this for people who tell me an interesting or compelling story. But not as a rule.)

No, I will not promote your company’s product or news release. Really?

Stop asking me those things.

I will do the following: tell you what your manager is probably thinking, tell you if your manager sucks, tell you if you sound like you’re the one who sucks, tell you how to handle your annoying coworker, tell you whether or not you really want that job, and so forth. That’s pretty much all.

{ 10 comments }

Politico has an incredible account today of a congressional staffer who freaked out on someone she didn’t know who called her “Liz” instead of “Elizabeth” in an email. And by freaked out, I mean had a 19-email exchange with her, lambasting her for the mistake, when the person was just seeking a meeting for her boss.

You can read the whole exchange over there, and it’s pretty amazing. The other person keeps apologizing and Elizabeth keeps attacking.

What do you think? Would you fire this woman?

{ 46 comments }