June 2011

A reader writes:

I have worked for my present company for 6 years and my current boss, who is the current Chief Executive Officer, for the last 5.  A month ago, I had to have emergency dental surgery. My office generally has a very liberal leave policy for salaried employees and this normally would not be a problem if the date of the surgery hadn’t fallen on the day of a very important meeting. I discussed the situation with my boss and he stated that it shouldn’t be a problem and that they could work around my absence as long as I got all my prep work done on the days leading up to the meeting. Even though I was in a ton of pain, I worked the entire three days  leading up to the surgery in an effort to make sure that the meeting would be a success in my absence. I had my oral surgeon write a note stating the necessity of the surgery, got the sick time approved by both my boss and the Human Resource Office, and checked in with my boss regularly on the days leading up the meeting (and my surgery) to make sure that my prep work was up to standard and that my absence would not cause a huge problem. He stated that all was well and that, as a true team, everyone could work together during the meeting to help a coworker who needed to be absent. I thought everything was fine. I even showed up early the morning of the meeting before heading to the surgeon’s office to make sure everything was set up and in working order.

After my return to work a week later, nothing bad was said about my absence and my boss stated that the meeting had been a success. However, a week or so ago I heard from a few co-workers that my boss had been complaining about my absence for an “elective” surgery. I thought that my co-workers must have misheard so I sort of just brushed it off as work gossip. I thought surely he would have told me in our initial talk or any of the subsequent talks leading up to the surgery that there was going to be a problem with my absence.

A few days ago, he called me in his office for a surprise performance review, where he included me missing an important meeting as one of the reasons for the review. He stated that he felt I had abandoned him at a crucial time and that I had known about the meeting months in advance. Although I had known about the meeting in advance, I felt that my reason for missing it was legitimate and necessary. I tried to make my case with him and asked him why he hadn’t brought it up when I first came to him requesting the day off. I apologized for my absence causing him or the company any problems and reiterated my love of the job and dedication to the company. He seemed angry and ended the review early, stating that he needed to think about things.

I am unsure of how to proceed. I really wish he had voiced his concerns prior to my absence. It is really hard to go back and fix a situation like this once it has occurred. How should I proceed? Why would he talk about it before approaching me directly?  I usually have a wonderful relationship with my boss so the sudden is a bit disheartening and actually very scary. Did I do something very, very wrong in this situation?

I don’t think you did anything wrong in this situation. Your boss is in the wrong for telling you that it wouldn’t be a problem, when in fact he clearly did feel it was a problem.

I would say this to your boss:  ”I’m really concerned about our discussion the other day. I feel terrible that you felt I was irresponsible in missing the meeting. I think I have a track record of reliability and showing that I’m here when you need me, and I hate to think this situation wasn’t aligned with that. But I’m also really confused, because when I initially approached you about it, you assured me that it would be okay and that you understood the necessity of the situation. That’s why I proceeded. It sounds like now you wish I hadn’t, but I’m not sure how to respond to that, because I felt you’d been very reassuring to me about taking the time off. I also really tried hard to mitigate the impact, coming in early the morning of the meeting before my surgery. It’s clear to me now, though, that you really wish I had handled this differently. I want to make sure that we don’t have this type of miscommunication in the future, and I’m hoping you can figure out how to avoid that.”

If he says that you can avoid it in the future by not missing important meetings, say, “Understood, and I won’t. But I also took you at your word that it wouldn’t be a problem, and I want to ask that you tell me ahead of time if you don’t like something I’m doing, so that I know and have the opportunity to change course before it’s too late.”

Throughout this, you want your tone to be concerned but neutral — not accusatory. You don’t want to make him feel defensive by pointing out that he contradicted  himself; you just want to neutrally lay out the facts and focus on how you can avoid this going forward.

It’s also worth asking yourself if there might be something else going on. Could your boss be frustrated with your reliability overall, not just in this situation?  Are you generally reliable and responsible?  (You certainly sound like it from how you handled this situation, but it’s worth asking.) Could your boss be frustrated with something else? If so, that doesn’t excuse the way he handled this, but it might give you insight into what’s going on. Alternately, is your boss not especially rational? Does he have a history of saying one thing and meaning another, or of changing his mind? If so, that’s useful information to keep in mind about him.

But your best bet is to have an honest, direct, guard-down conversation with him. Good luck!

{ 66 comments }

A reader writes:

I went to an interview today at a very small insurance company. Everything was going great until I spent some time with one of the account managers I was going to be working with. She made a comment about her daughter playing softball and went on to say “but she’s not a dyke or anything.”  This completely turned me off to the company, as I myself am gay.

I believe the company will be sending me a written offer in the next day or so, and I don’t know what reason I should give for turning down their offer. I want to be honest, but I don’t want to burn a bridge, as my field is a very close-knit community. Do I just tell them for “personal reasons” I decline their offer?

If I were the manager, I would really, really want to know that this happened, so I urge you to tell them. At a minimum, you could say, “One of the people I spoke with gave me the impression the company isn’t very gay-friendly.”

It’s probably also worth considering that this one staff member may not be representative of the rest of the company. If you’d have otherwise wanted to accept the offer, it might be worth asking how gay-friendly the company is. If they sound uncomfortable or taken aback, you’ll have a clearer answer. If they tell you it’s a gay-friendly environment and sound credible, at that point you could say, “The reason I asked is because someone I spoke with while I was interviewing made a remark about gay people.” See how they respond to that.

What other thoughts do people have on how to approach this?

{ 87 comments }

A reader writes:

My husband recently graduated from a technical college, and is now on the job search.  Yesterday, he interviewed (which went VERY well!) for a position at the company where I work.

I’ve been there for nearly four years and am in very good standing, as I’ve proven myself a reliable and professional employee.  I personally know a few of the people with which he interviewed (one I even graduated from high school with, and is a friend), have worked with them on projects in the past, and I view them as very friendly, open people.  I’m wondering, what are my boundaries when it comes to talking about my husband’s employment prospects with my co-workers?  Should I remain completely hands-off, and just not do it?  Or because of the close-knit atmosphere, could I approach my fellow employees with a quick mention of how excited my husband is to potentially work there, and that he would be the perfect candidate out of the twelve people they are interviewing?

Additionally, we just really, really need him to get this job!  Finances have been very tight for a very long time, and it would be a complete and total blessing for my husband to land this position.  I realize this is not my fellow employees’ problem, but my company does tend to “take care of their own,” and does employ several husband-wife duos (in different departments, of course).  If it were as simple as just telling my interviewing co-workers that they would not regret hiring my husband, that they won’t find a more driven person, and how badly we need him to snag this position, I’d do it in a heartbeat.  But, I DO NOT want to hurt his prospects in any way!

What do you think?  Would a quick chat with a fellow friend/co-worker possibly help my husband?  Or would I just end up hurting him?

Personally, I wouldn’t do it. It’s not going to come as any surprise to them that you’d say positive things about your husband, and you risk putting them in an awkward position if they end up not thinking he’s the best person for the job.

And by not attempting to influence the decision, you demonstrate that you’re able to handle the situation professionally if indeed they do hire him.  There’s always a concern when hiring someone’s spouse that they’ll inappropriately function as a unit — i.e., that if Spouse A isn’t getting along with her boss, Spouse B’s relationship with that person will be impacted too, and so forth. So by demonstrating now that you keep your marriage and your business life separate, I’d argue that you’re actually helping his candidacy.

I’d probably say something like this:   “John is really excited about the role after his interview yesterday, and I think that position could be a great fit. However, I want to make sure you know that it’s not going to cause any awkwardness with me if he ultimately doesn’t get the job — although of course I hope he does!”  And then I’d leave it there.

However, if you ignore me and decide to say something to your coworkers after all, at least avoid statements like the one above saying that he’d be the best person for the job out of the 12 people they’re interviewing — because unless you’re very familiar with all the other candidates, you really can’t say that credibly.

Really though, the best way to help your husband in this situation is to help him understand what the company is looking for, what the culture is like, how he could best make a contribution in the role he’s applying for, and any company-specific nuances that might help him communicate that.

Anyone want to disagree?

{ 13 comments }

I’m really testing you guys today on how many posts you can tolerate from me in a single day, but the answer to this one is short. A reader writes:

The company I work for has about 200 employees and is part of a larger corporation. Merit raises for everyone have been on hold since 2008, per the corporation. A corporate executive will be coming to our town for an all-employee meeting. He has agreed to answer our questions about “merit and benefit thinking” after his prepared remarks. Local management has asked us to be respectful when asking questions. I feel lucky to have a job I like, even without raises, in this economy.

So…what are some ways to respectfully word questions about financial incentives and merit raises to a corporate executive at an all-employee meeting? This large meeting is very different that a one-on-one salary review meeting with your manager.

I’ve been with the company for 10 years. We used to get merit raises and performance bonuses annually. The corporation controls our pay scales and merit raise amounts. We have a hiring freeze that is several years old, and our 401(k) match was discontinued 2 years ago. I am grateful for my job, and I really enjoy the work I do. However, we’re starting to lose good employees — key staff members — because of the financial restrictions. Many of us have picked up the extra responsibilities without getting a title change or pay raise.

Great question. You want to seek the info in a neutral way without coming across as confrontational or challenging. I’d just say this:

“Understanding, of course, that the economy continues to be tough, what can you tell us about plans for merit raises, which have been frozen since 2008?”

Bonus points if you can convince your manager to ask it on your team’s behalf.

{ 23 comments }

I don’t know if it’s the tight job market or just increasing incivility in general, but job-seekers are increasingly subjected to poor behavior from employers, from companies that never call for the scheduled phone interview to inappropriate demands for private information on online job applications.

Over at U.S. News & World Report today, I call for a job-seekers’ bill of rights.

Not a legal bill of rights, because that’s not my bag. But a moral/ethical/common courtesy one.

You can read it here.

{ 12 comments }

I’m quoted in this article on what to do when you’re overworked, making the obnoxious but true point that sometimes the problem is you. Stop playing on Facebook!

Once I got that out of the way, though, I offered up some tips on what to do if the problem is really the workload.

{ 6 comments }

I like to over-think things, so help me over-think this one:

I often enjoy working over the weekend, or late at night. I’m a night owl, for one thing, and also I like getting work out of the way so that it’s not hanging over me. However, I don’t expect anyone who works for or with me to do the same, and in fact I go out of my way to ensure that they don’t feel pressured to mirror my habits and fairly regularly encourage people not to work over the weekend and so forth.

Okay. There’s the background. Now, let’s say I’m hiring for an open position, and part of the process is going to involve email correspondence — sending an exercise to the most competitive candidates, for instance.

Now say you’re one of those candidates and you receive an email from me on a Saturday or at 11 p.m. on a weeknight. Do you conclude that if you took the job, you’d be working in a culture that would expect similar hours from you? Or do you not care? Are you just happy to get some kind of response at all and could care less what time it was sent?

Typically I try not to send hiring-related emails at crazy hours or over the weekend because of this worry. Is that worry legitimate, or is it misplaced?

{ 147 comments }

It’s once again short answer Sunday, with another six short answers to six short questions.

Thank-you gifts when an internship ends

My summer internship is ending in a month, and I am having trouble thinking of appropriate thank you gifts. The team I work with has six individuals who have all taught me a lot, but it would be too costly to buy each of them a gift: a $25 item quickly becomes $150 when multiplied by six. On the other hand, a simple card seems too cheap. I have thought of buying them lunch or organizing an event, but they have sporadic schedules and it is hard to find a time when all of them are free. Do you have any advice for a good gift that won’t break the bank?

Actually, a card with a heartfelt note from you — or no card but just a heartfelt letter — would be the best gift you could give, way better than anything you might buy. Tell them what you learned from them, what their help meant to you, and so forth. That’s the kind of thing that people really remember, and it means much, much more than a trinket. I used to keep a stack of cards and notes like that, and it made me feel great to look back through them.

Removed from my management duties

I have been told this week, after managing my team for 5 years, that since we are having a re-structure, I am no longer required as the manager. I still have all my same duties but now they have made someone else responsible for the team and they want me to answer to her. Even though I have been told I do a great job, they have just decided to change things. Where do I stand?

Two possibilities: Either they didn’t think you were managing effectively, or they have totally unrelated reasons for the restructure. It’s completely reasonable for you to ask if your performance as a manager played a role in this decision or what else might be behind it.

Is it illegal to leave jobs off an application?

I remember the post you did about things employees think are illegal that really aren’t. It got me wondering–I’ve always heard it’s illegal to omit information from a job application deliberately. My resume is selective because space is limited and there’s usually an application later anyway, but I’ve been applying for any job I can, like grocery stores and restaurants, and those are online apps. It’s been a long time since I bothered to read the “I certify…” thing at the end because I’ve never tried to hide anything, but I’m certain I’ve seen ones that say it’s actually illegal to leave anything off.

I’ve probably done 3-5 of these a week for almost two years and only got maybe three phone calls total. When I tell people, they say I should leave my college degree off the application. (Heck, one guy, who manages a McD’s, suggested I pretend I never graduated HS). If I did that in order to get past the “overqualified” excuse, how much trouble could I get into if they later found out?

It’s not illegal in the sense that there’s no law that mandates full and complete info on job applications. However, there’s usually a statement at the bottom of those things that says that you’re certifying that the information is full and complete, and that you understand that you can later be terminated if it’s found that it’s not. Signing something that you know is false is illegal, but the chances of you facing legal consequences for it in this context are zero. What’s more likely is that you’d face disciplinary action, including firing, from the company itself … although I think it’s extremely unlikely that they’d find out that you have a degree that you didn’t claim, or that they’d care if they did find out.

Interviewing for the same job a year later

A little over a year ago, I had a job interview that I thought went pretty well. But even though I followed up several times, I never heard from the company again. I was pretty disappointed, but I moved on. Now, a year later, I saw that they are hiring for that position again. Perhaps the person they hired instead of me has left, but I got the impression they had several people with that title. In the city where I live, there aren’t a lot of jobs available in my field. I can count on one hand the number of interviews I’ve had in the past two years I’ve been looking. I figured I might as well apply for this job again. I mentioned that I had been in for an interview last year in my cover letter.

The good news is that they want to bring me in for another interview. Do you have any advice on how I should approach this? Should I try to find out why they passed on me last year so I can speak to their concerns? Should I even consider them after they treated me poorly last year?

I wouldn’t focus on trying to find out what their concerns were last year — since they’re bringing you in again, it’s more likely that they thought you were perfectly qualified but someone else was just a better fit. As for whether you should even be willing to work for them after they never got back to you — well, only you can decide that. I think it’s a really rude practice, as I’ve ranted about in the past, but it’s also really common, which should probably be factored in. And frankly, much as I despise that, if I’d been looking for two years, I doubt I’d let their non-response last year stand in my way.

Driving across country for a job interview

I recently have gotten an opportunity that would take me across the country. The person I spoke with is aware I will be making the long journey for the meeting. I am wondering if this means they are more serious about me as a prospective employee. I came across the position through a friend of a friend so I am hoping that means they won’t have me make the long drive and then really not have a strong interest. I am just wondering what the other side is thinking in this position.

You’re driving across country for an interview? Wow. In any case, in an ideal world, an employer would only invite candidates for interviews if they had a serious interest, especially if the candidate will be paying their own travel. In reality, not everyone is that considerate. The best way to handle this is to say, “I’d be glad to get myself out there to meet with you, but since I’ll be paying my own expenses, I wonder if you can give me a sense of how strong you consider my candidacy.”

Did I not get the job because I didn’t negotiate for a higher salary?

After following your cover letter, resume and interview tips, the place I wanted to work at–a small law firm, where I would be a legal assistant–was very interested in me. Yesterday, they called to tell me that it was down to me and another candidate. They wanted to see if I was still interested, if I was comfortable with the salary and benefits (which I totally was–would that be a bad thing to agree to a first offer?) and my future career goals. Everything seemed good for them. Today, I got another call saying that they offered the position to the other candidate and he accepted it, therefore rejecting me.

Disappointed doesn’t begin to cover how I feel. I plan on following up with them for feedback (again, your advice) but my over-analytical mind can’t help but obsess about whether it was something I did or didn’t do. Should I have negotiated for a higher salary, played hardball or was there anything I could do that would have improved my chances in getting the job? I didn’t want to come across as desperate or overly aggressive, and I was genuinely comfortable with the pay. Please help me to stop over-thinking it.

I don’t think their decision was based on the fact that you didn’t negotiate. If this was a position that required tough negotiation skills, then maybe — but for a legal assistant, no. And lots of people don’t negotiate (although they should). Stop beating yourself up — it sounds like you were a strong candidate who they would have been happy to hire, but someone else was just a better fit.

{ 19 comments }

A reader writes:

Would it be OK for me to contact a college alum who is in a senior-level position at a company I’m interested in working for AFTER I apply for a job at the company (e.g. to ask if s/he could personally consider my resume and/or if s/he knows of a job that would better fit my skills and interests)?

I read a post on your blog saying that some applicants ask for an “informational interview” with someone they know at the company and try to use that as kind of a “back-door” way of getting the job, and I heard that’s frowned upon by many employers in the U.S.  But at the same time, I keep hearing that job seekers need to leverage their alumni networks, but I don’t really see the difference between contacting an alum (say, via LinkedIn) to ask about working for the company vs. requesting an interview with an alum or other contact at the company to try to increase one’s chances of getting a job there.  Could you explain the difference (if any) to me and tell me what would be the right way to go about this process?

You’re confused because you’re confusing informational interviews with networking.

Informational interviews are used when you’re new to a field and seeking insight and information from someone who’s already established in that field. You do them when you’re looking for information that’s more nuanced than what you’d find online — stuff like which info out there is good and which is bad, the inside scoop on some of the big players, advice on career path, and so forth. You typically get informational interviews by approaching someone connected to you some way, even if it’s a few degrees of separation (your uncle’s former coworker’s boyfriend or whatever), but you can also sometimes get them from strangers, if you approach them the right way.

But what you’re talking about sounds more like networking — leveraging your connections to increase your chances of being considered for a particular job. And to answer your original question, yes, it’s totally fine to do that, and you should absolutely contact the alum who works at the company you’re interested in. Be up-front about the fact that you’ve applied for a job there and that you’re really interested in working there in some capacity, and say that you’d be grateful for their advice and the opportunity to connect in general, since you’re in the same field.

(And let me use this as an opportunity to remind people to be clear about whether you’re seeking an informational interview or a job, and if it’s the former to be clear on what you hope to get out of it.)

{ 3 comments }

“References available upon request.”

Do you have this line on the bottom of your resume?

If you do, go delete it.

Believe me, no one is concerned that you might refuse to provide references upon request. It’s assumed that you will. It’s like saying “phone calls returned upon request.”

You have that line there because at some point long ago you learned that it was the thing to do. But it’s 100% unnecessary, it’s a tiny bit dated in feel, and it’s taking up valuable space that you could use for something with more of an impact. Go take it out! It’ll be liberating, like cutting those scary “PENALTY OF LAW” tags off your mattress.

{ 27 comments }