should companies respond to Glassdoor reviews? by Alison Green on August 13, 2014 A reader writes: Is it a good idea for employers to reply to Glassdoor reviews? I’ve never really thought there was much to be gained from replying publicly to positive or negative reviews. What’s causing me to reconsider is one we received that’s just not factual about our interview and rejection process. I’m wondering if you think we’d benefit from clarifying what happened or if we should just leave it be. If you think a reply would be a good idea, thoughts on the best way to respond? Glassdoor does encourage employers to respond to reviews that employees and applicants leave of them. But a lot of employers do it really poorly — replying to critical reviews with canned, inauthentic sounding pablum (or worse, defensiveness), or replying to positive reviews with such chirpy marketing-speak that it casts doubt on the authenticity of the positive reviews themselves. In those cases, they’d be better off not responding at all. Some companies also weigh in on every single review, which I also think is a bad idea. It comes across as saying “we don’t trust employees and applicants to talk about us amongst themselves; we feel we need to manage the discussion.” Since most people who use Glassdoor aren’t looking for the company’s party line but rather for real people’s experiences, it comes across as tone-deaf … and tone-deaf in a very specific way that’s likely to raise the hackles of anyone who’s ever worked in an environment where people’s thoughts and opinions were too closely monitored. All that said … In your case, you have a situation where an applicant has outright falsified her version of events. (Note: The letter-writer sent me the review in question, as well as correspondence with the applicant that clearly disproves her version of events.) So there’s an argument for a short, dispassionate response correcting the record. The key, though, is to do it without sounding defensive. One way to do that is by not focusing the bulk of your reply on the fact that the reviewer is wrong, but instead on “here’s how we handle these issues; here’s what we strive for and why.” And of course, write it in a way that sounds like a real person and not like a statement that HR carefully constructed to deflect criticism. You may also like:I distributed layoff plans without permission, new job says I can’t take a previously okayed trip, and morecandidates who don’t respond to interview invitationsmy networking contact chastised me; how should I respond?