how can I come out as queer mid-career? by Alison Green on May 20, 2021 It’s the Thursday “ask the readers” question. A reader writes: I’ve been with my employer for over 10 years and in that time my personal identity has shifted significantly from the professional identity I projected at my hiring. I allowed my colleagues to assume I was a straight, cisgender woman in a monogamous relationship. That was never true but when I was younger I was willing to hide key parts of my identity for a significant career opportunity. Something about having my colleagues “in” my home via Zoom has made the separation between my personal and professional life more upsetting. Addintally we have an active team working to deepen our diversity and I struggle with the exclusion of LGBTQIA+ identities from that work. The reality is I am a non-binary, bisexual human in a polyamorous relationship. How can I redefine myself as a queer person at work? Readers who identify as queer or otherwise LGBTQIA+, what’s your advice? (I’m asking others to hang back on this one; let’s hear from people with personal experience.) You may also like:how to get better at using a coworker's nonbinary pronounsa VP wants me to out myself at work and won't take no for an answerupdate: my employee keeps getting deadnamed by a coworker { 394 comments }
dealing with abusive patients, incompetent coworker needs too much help, and more by Alison Green on May 20, 2021 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. Putting up a sign about abusive patients I am a long time manager of a multi-location health care group. Our staff can’t work from home because –you know— patients! With the exception of a few weeks in April of 2020, our staff worked throughout the pandemic to take care of our patients. In the past year, protocols have changed as the pandemic progressed. We started with locked doors and patients texting when they arrived. Our staff took temperatures and asked 10-15 Covid questions of every patient who entered the office. They sanitized door handles, waiting room chairs, counters and those nifty Lexan shields at the front desks. They couldn’t eat together in the lunch room so some ate lunch in their cars. They met patients in the parking lot (in the northeast in the winter) to deliver items that needed to be picked up. They were rock stars! Amazingly, almost all of our staff stuck with us through this entire time — which is great because the labor market in our area was challenging before the pandemic and is much worse now. The people who work here are stressed and exhausted. Some have lost family members during the pandemic. Overall our patients have been grateful for our services and complementary of our efforts to keep them and our staff safe throughout the last year. In the past month, however, we have had an astounding increase in patients who have been downright abusive to our staff. For example, patients who interrupt staff members and threaten to “talk to the owners” and “get them fired” over a minor communication issue. On more than one occasion, staff members have been brought to tears by these patients. We have lost two wonderful employees in the past few months because they can’t deal with the rude patients! In these cases a manager or the physician contact the patient directly and dismiss them from the practice, but I don’t feel that is enough to show our staff that we support them. Normally I am squarely opposed to posting signs in the office (for all to see) to correct a problem that is caused by only a few, but I am seriously considering posting something in support of our staff. What would I say? We are doing our best? We appreciate your patience? Don’t be mean to the staff? As we were discussing our options we thought we could add, “We can’t believe we have to post this either…” We certainly don’t want to offend the 95% of our patients who are appreciative and just a joy to deal with. How do we show support for our staff and address this situation in a positive way? I don’t think the 95% of your patients who are polite would be offended by that type of sign; they’d probably just be disappointed that it’s necessary (disappointed in their fellow humans, not in you). But I’m also skeptical it would work for the other 5% (in the same way that group emails about one person’s problem behavior tend to go right over the head of that person). They’ll either ignore the sign or think it doesn’t apply to them or think their behavior is justified anyway. People are abusive to others aren’t going to read “please be patient / we’re doing our best” and change their behavior. But firing abusive patients — as you’ve been doing — is a powerful way to show your staff you support them. You can also empower them to deal with abusive patients on the spot; let them know you’ll have their back if they tell a patient they’ll be asked to leave if they don’t speak more politely/wait their turn/etc. 2. My incompetent coworker needs too much help from me I share a cube with a perfectly nice, but mostly incompetent coworker. She and I are peers, but she is the admin to four different managers and I’m in a non-support position that reports to her managers’ boss. Whenever one of her managers asks her to run a report or do a project for them, five minutes later she’ll be whining (yes, literally whining) for me to help because she barely knows the basics of Microsoft Office and the company’s database software. Besides not being familiar with the programs, she’s also afraid to ask clarifying questions, so a good part of my time helping her is spent trying to figure out what exactly she was asked to do in the first place. And the process is repeated every time she gets a new project because she retains none of what I teach her. And I’m not talking about trickier things like pivot tables and macros, I mean basics like how to change font size or sort a spreadsheet. I love being the person in the office that everyone goes to when they want to learn something new, like a cool time-saving Excel trick, or how to do a mail merge. But when I’m repeating myself every single time she asks for help, it gets frustrating, and I’m afraid it’s starting to come across in my tone with her. (“Oh, I see the problem — you need to sort your spreadsheet. Sort it. By the first column. Column. Click anywhere in Column A. The A at the top of the spreadsheet. Column A. Now choose ‘sort’ from the Data tab. Data. At the top where it says ‘Data’…”) It’s not outside my job description to do these kinds of reports and projects for her managers. Can I just train them to ask me to do them in the first place? It would take me less time than trying to teach my coworker how to do them over and over again. You could, but it would be covering up the problem. Another option is to stop letting her rely on you so much so she has to figure things out for herself or get more guidance from her manager, which is going to be more helpful in the long run. (What’s she going to do if you’re out for a week, after all?) Why not start saying, “Sorry, I can’t help — I’m swamped today” and see if she becomes more self-sufficient? You could also have a big-picture conversation with her about the pattern — “I’ve been spending a lot of time helping you figure out X and Y and it’s keeping me from focusing on my work. I’m going to be more disciplined about not doing that, but you can check resources like A and B or talk to (manager) directly with questions.” 3. I’m supposed to say “your services are no longer needed” During Covid, my organization hired an additional two dozen people to help with our busy season, which ends very soon. The organization has decided to retain half these positions into the not-busy season. When asked, almost all of these temporary hires were interested in staying on. During the one-on-one meeting where I talk to each person who is not being retained, my organization will only permit the phrase “your services are no longer needed.” With that constraint, what’s the best way to communicate this information with empathy? Are you sure they mean you can literally only use those words or might they mean you should stick to that overall concept? If they really want you to use those exact words, you should push back because that’s going to come across really badly — gratuitously callous and just weird. Instead, normally you’d say something like, “We had more people interested in staying on past the busy season than we have positions to offer, and unfortunately we’re not going to be able to offer you work past (date).” If you really that you’re not allowed to say that or something similar, please push back and advocate for more human-sounding messaging than “your services are no longer needed.” 4. Do I have to give notice in person when I’ve been working from home? I have been trying to leave my company since last June, when they were critical of me for being less productive when I was caring for my child at home because daycare was closed due to Covid. I had been forced back into the office through last fall, and the majority of employees disregarded the company’s mask mandates. I got Covid even though I wore a mask … which I gave to my husband and child … which my child gave to his daycare teachers. Which caused the daycare to totally shut down for two weeks … and all the while I was again criticized for my lack of productivity when I was sleeping round the clock due to COVID fatigue. I finally found a new job that I am excited about and suffice it to say that I would be thrilled to never see these jerks again. I have been working remotely since I got Covid and would love to give notice over the phone rather than having to go in and listen to my boss’s commentary on it. My friends in the same field are split, with some saying I don’t need to go in to give notice since I have been there less than two years, and the other half saying that I should to avoid leaving on a bad note. I will be leaving on a bad note anyway — they already have deemed me lazy and uncommitted because I had to care for my child and then got COVID. What do you think? You work remotely, so it’s fine to give your notice over the phone. There’s no reason you need to go there in-person for this one business conversation when you’ve been doing everything else from afar. (That said, I don’t understand your friends saying that it’s okay because you’ve been there less than two years — length of employment doesn’t really enter into it.) 5. Reapplying for a job I was a finalist for before Covid froze hiring Last year, just before COVID hit, I was interviewing for a dream job at an organization I’d love to work for. My interview process started in March of 2020 and by April they had moved me to the final stage of the process. By May of 2020, they let me know that they had paused all hiring until further notice. Well, it’s been a year and it looks like they are picking hiring for that position up again, and I’d love to reapply. I want to reach out to the recruiter and see if they’re still interested in me and If I can pick up where we left off or if I should apply through the usual channel. (I did check LinkedIn to see if he was still working there as it’s been a while.) If I do reach out, should I include a bit about what I’ve been up to professionally the last year? Should I apply and then send an “FYI I’m still interested” type of note? I’m not even sure he’s the recruiter working on this particular position. Should I be reaching out at all? Go ahead and reapply to get yourself officially in the ring, and mention at the start of your cover letter that you were interviewing with them last year before they froze hiring. (Update your cover letter so it’s not the same one you submitted last time.) Then email the recruiter or hiring manager you were working with last time, remind them of where things were left last year, and say you’re still very interested in being considered and you’ve submitted a formal application and would welcome hearing from them if they still think it might be the right match. I wouldn’t assume they’ll definitely want to pick back up right where you left off; the position may have changed in the last year or they might want to start fresh and see where you fit in relative to the other candidates in the pool this time. Or they might be thrilled you’re still available and want to move you back into their process quickly. But doing both things above should position you as strongly as possible. Good luck! You may also like:I pushed back on my coworker's bigotry: a success storymy boss wants me to help him jump the line for the Covid vaccinehere's a real-life email from an employer that's managing its re-opening well { 488 comments }
an expert on how to get what you need from your health insurance by Alison Green on May 19, 2021 An Ask a Manager reader who works in health insurance as a customer service trainer wrote to me and offered to give advice about navigating health insurance, saying, “Basically, I get paid to learn and teach how to beat the system as much as possible. I love my job as much as I hate this industry and system, so I’m always game to help people out and answer questions … I teach customer care reps, so I’m teaching them the rules, why things happen like they do, and then how to find the wiggle room and exceptions so that we can actually take care of providers and consumers. That looks like things we can do within the insurance itself like adjusting claims or nudging consumers to ask for reviews of denied prior authorizations, to reaching out to provider billing offices to mediate billing issues. There’s also a lot of explaining, educating, and directing to resources (in the company like our in-house care management, as well as externally like EAPs or community resources).” I said yes, we want her tips! She put together this Q&A to help people. How do I know what plan to pick? If your employer offers multiple plans, look at the value of predictability as well as the overall out of pocket maximum. If you prefer to know exactly what you’re going to pay every time you go to the doctor, a copay plan will likely work best. If you have lots of medical expenses, especially early in the year, a deductible plan might work best. If you need the options explained to you, you can either talk to your benefits coordinator at work or call the insurance company to talk through coverage and cost. What if my prior authorization or referral gets denied? Call your insurance company. When you get to a rep, have them confirm that the authorization is still denied. If it is, ask them to initiate an appeal, or appeal the denial. Either wording should work. Often, reps can’t offer an appeal, but if you ask, then they’ll get one started for you. This will start a review of the denial, which means that the insurance company will review the denial again, including asking for records and/or a conversation with your doctor. They might not change their mind, but it’s always worth a try. If you’ve already tried that, reach out to your state Department of Health or Department of Financial Services, or your elected representatives (state or federal level). Social media and traditional media pressure often work wonders, too. What can I include in my appeal to boost my chances of a favorable outcome? Try and mirror the denial language, if at all possible. Don’t make stuff up, but do talk about what you’ve done that might help meet their criteria for approval. If the denial is because you didn’t do formal physical therapy during a pandemic, but you did do a home exercise program, mention that. Tell them how you got to the point of having this procedure requested. Highlight how the condition being treated is impacting your activities of daily living (dressing yourself, toileting/hygiene, mobility, eating, etc.) or employment and how the test or treatment helps address those problems. Tug at their heartstrings. What’s the deal with insurers denying things they say aren’t medical necessary when they clearly are? Medical practitioners who work for the insurance company look at a procedure or service that a doctor wants to do to treat a patient, and decide if the service and the treatment leading up to it meet the criteria for the insurance company to consider it “medically necessary.” Now, “medically necessary” doesn’t always mean “no, you don’t need this procedure.” Sometimes – even often – it means “there were other treatments that could have done the same thing that you haven’t tried yet, that are less invasive and cost less, why don’t you give those a try first?” If a prior authorization is denied, the patient and/or the provider can challenge that denial, and it will be reviewed again by a different reviewer. There’s a whole department dedicated to these re-reviews, and lots of regulations around how they do what they do. Case in point: I suffered a serious injury a couple of years ago, and the doctors immediately went “yeah, you need surgery.” The prior auth was denied because we didn’t do physical therapy first – which can sometimes be useful in treating the symptoms I had. But when a jelly donut pops, no amount of PT is going to put the jelly back in. You just gotta clean it up. So I sent in an appeal to challenge the denial, which basically consisted of “look at this picture from my MRI and tell me how PT is going to help that.” Within literal hours, the authorization was granted and my surgery was back on the books. What if I went to the ER but my claim was denied because insurance said my condition wasn’t actually an emergency? See if your state has something called an Emergency Services or Prudent Layperson mandate (law) that you can appeal the decision under. These basically say that if a normal person without any medical training could reasonably believe that they were in serious danger of death or disfigurement if they didn’t get emergency medical care, then seeking emergency medical care is appropriate and should be covered. In other words, if you have severe chest pain, then you go to the ER. It’s not up to you to tell the difference between a heart attack and severe, unexpected heartburn (actual claim I saw…). Can I ask my insurance company to call a provider for me? You betcha! If your insurance is through certain national franchises with names like Purple Star And Purple Square, there might be rules about how they can get in touch with providers outside of their servicing area, but there are ways around those restrictions. What can I ask my insurance company to call a provider about? Authorizations, referrals, is the provider in network, and, my absolute favorite, if you don’t understand a bill, if they’re billing you incorrectly or if the insurance company is reprocessing or reviewing a claim. If you don’t understand a bill, a rep can call the billing office and get clarification – I LOVE translating billing-speak for people. If the provider is billing you incorrectly, the insurance company can put a lot more weight behind enforcing billing rules than you as an individual can, and was one of my favorite things to do. If the insurance company is reviewing or reprocessing a claim, at the very least they can ask the provider to put your account on hold until the reprocessing is done. They can also ask the provider to put your account on hold for a coding or billing review, which can buy you some time. What information will my insurance company need if i need them to call a provider for me about a bill? They’ll need the name of the entity sending the bill, the invoice or account number, the amount of the bill, the date or dates of service, and the billing phone number from the bill at a minimum. They’ll probably also see if you remember who performed the service and what the service was. What if I can’t afford my medical bill, but it’s correct? Ugh, I hate that this is a thing. In this case, you can probably work out a payment plan with your provider. If you want, you can ask your insurance company to call on your behalf and see what options are available before your call the provider yourself, or to do a conference call with the provider’s billing office to help translate billing- speak for you. Why won’t the insurance company tell me things about my spouse/adult child’s claims? This is where HIPAA comes into play. Subscribers (the person who gets the policy through their job) will still get all explanations of benefits and monthly health summaries, but once someone turns 18, the insurance company can’t give out any information about policy use without authorization. Some specific categories of treatments or illnesses can also have tighter restrictions and require a specific authorization. Talk to your benefit coordinator or insurance company and find out how to get that authorization on file – sometimes you have to fill out a paper form, and sometimes you can do it through an online account. I have so many doctors that I have trouble keeping track of them. Can my insurance company help at all? Possibly. Call in and ask about medical care management or case management services. Your employer’s EAP (if they have one) may also have case management services available. Anything else people should know? The insurance company has a contract with lots of doctors that defines how much they’ll pay for each service. Any doctor with a contract is considered “In Network.” This contract does a lot, but there are two pieces directly applicable to consumers. First, it outlines what services the company will reimburse a provider for. For example, an orthopedist won’t get paid for doing heart surgery, because that’s not something they’re supposed to be doing. The second thing the contract does is set the maximum that the medical provider will be paid for a service, between the insurance company payment and any patient cost share. This is the “Allowed Amount.” Patient cost share (copay, coinsurance, deductible) will never exceed the allowed amount – you’ll never pay more than that contracted rate, no matter what the provider charges. We see stories in the news all the time about hospitals charging $40 for a tongue depressor, which is obviously absurd, but the insurance company can turn around and say “hahahaha no, you’re getting paid a penny for that, nice try,” and the hospital has to write off the $39.99 – they don’t get to bill the patient, because of that contract with the insurance company. If you go to a provider who doesn’t have a contract with your insurance company, that’s considered “Out of Network” and there’s nothing protecting you from the provider billing you for their full charged amount. When possible, stay in network. That protection is what you’re paying for. (If you can’t find an in-network doctor to do what you need, ask your insurance company for an exception.) A common misconception when it comes to deductible plans is that if the insurance company doesn’t pay for something, it’s not covered, when often the whole allowed amount just went to deductible. When this happens, the patient has to pay the entire allowed amount, but there is still coverage in that the insurance policy limits how much a provider can bill a patient. Insurance companies also offer lots of services outside of just the provider networks and benefits contracts. There are often discount programs for things that aren’t specifically medical care, but support your overall health. There also might be case management programs available, to help people with complex medical issues navigate the insurance and medical labyrinth. If all avenues with the insurance company fail, outside entities that can help are patient advocacy groups, your state department of health, the attorney general, and your state and federal representatives and senators. Media and popular pressure is also a lever you can pull. Also, I can guarantee that the vast majority of phone reps you talk to will want to help you. They know that health insurance is at the intersection of people’s money and health, and is a really confusing, scary, and overwhelming place to be. My fondest memories of being on the phones are of times that I really helped a consumer, whether it was helping a piece of their policy make sense, getting a provider billing office off their back, or reducing a bill for them. Truly, the reps are there to help you and will do their absolute best for you. Sometimes their hands are tied, but most of the time there’s something that can be done. You may also like:my boss discourages us from using our health insuranceif you lost your job recently, you're eligible for 6 months of free health insurancemy boss wants me to take on a new task – and I don’t want to! { 479 comments }
my employee injured his coworker in an office prank by Alison Green on May 19, 2021 A reader writes: I manage two employees, Roger and Niles, who are friends and in their 20s. This team is not an entry-level team; both employees have been promoted to be on this team, and they have both worked for the company for several years. Yesterday, as a prank, Roger placed a pair of scissors on Niles’ chair, apparently assuming Niles would see them before sitting. He did not. Niles was injured and taken to an urgent care for a puncture wound. His injuries were minor, fortunately. Roger stated he did not mean to injure Niles and it was just a bad prank. Niles stated that he did not want to get anyone in trouble, and he was not angry about what had occurred. I wrote Roger up for the situation, and that was the end of it. Should I have considered firing him? I answer this question — and four others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here. Other questions I’m answering there today include: Setting boundaries with clients who proselytize or try to sell things Hiring someone when I know the job might change significantly soon Re-applying at an organization that I turned down five years ago for ethical reasons Using an example from 10 years ago in my cover letter You may also like:an office prank ended in injury, boss won’t stop talking about my pregnancy plans, and moreI was one of the interns fired for writing a proposal for a more flexible dress codeI said "EEOC" and things got weird { 234 comments }
my boss wants me to ask a rejected problematic job candidate to volunteer by Alison Green on May 19, 2021 A reader writes: I was wondering what your thoughts are asking a rejected job candidate to volunteer at our organization. It’s a complicated situation, because the candidate has been very involved here and has a good background, except for his condescending tone, tendency to ramble, overwhelming eagerness (to the point of it being uncomfortable), and an apparent lack of self-awareness. My first experience with this candidate (I’ll call him John) was pre-Covid. For context, I am a woman in my 20s, and he is a 50+ man. I was leading my first public event in my role, and afterwards John came up to me and started a lengthy conversation that I found very condescending. He seemed to be quizzing me on some very basic aspects of my job — things that a very entry-level person would know. I have some very specialized knowledge despite my age, and I know I might appear even younger than I am, but I strongly felt that John was trying to find some weakness or gap in my abilities. He found out that he has a more advanced degree than me and seemed to be pleased with that information. Then, he casually mentioned that he had applied for my role (by sending his resume straight to the director, ignoring the actual process) and that he “had just missed the deadline,” apparently implying that he would have gotten the job if he’d submitted his resume earlier. I later learned that this was not true and that they had chosen not to interview him. I just felt an air of sexism and entitlement after the conversation. Fast forward to a year later, and he applied for an assistant position in my department. Due to Covid, we didn’t have any in-person events, so I had not seen him since our first interaction. During the pandemic, my department got a new manager and it was she and I who would be interviewing John. I let her know right away what my experience had been, but said that I would of course give him a fair chance. She appreciated the background. The interview was … a complete and total confirmation of all of my concerns. Thankfully, my boss completely agreed. Just a few notes from the interview: • The interview took most other candidates about 45 minutes. John talked for over an hour and a half, and we skipped the last four questions just so we could end it at that point. • In both his cover letter and his interview, he talked about working with “upper-level management” on “developing an overall strategy” — things that an assistant would never do. • He used a ton of jargon and unnecessarily complicated words constantly. • His answers didn’t actually answer the questions. It felt like he was telling us exactly what he wanted to tell us about his background. • His tone was way too eager, even desperate, and that was off-putting enough to make me concerned about how he might interact with the public. • He often referenced his knowledge in the major aspects of my role, making me think he would have a hard time working under me. • Many of his comments made it obvious that he believes he is absolutely fantastic, to the point of being overqualified. • Throughout the interview, he launched into mini-lectures about different topics in our field, directed at my manager and me, clearly trying to educate us on them. These topics were all things we discuss and practice daily. Honestly, even though his background seemed great on paper, it was not exceptional. He ended the interview by complimenting our “interview style” in a way that felt totally patronizing. We hired someone else for the job, and she is working out fantastically. My problem is, my manager and her boss both seem to think that asking John to volunteer is a good idea. We are in pretty desperate need of help in my area, and we’re expanding this summer, which will leave us even more short-handed. We don’t have the budget to hire someone. My boss was a bit reluctant, but the bottom line is that John does know this field very well, would likely be a great ambassador, and could be extremely useful. I have a few other contacts who I plan on asking to volunteer, and that makes it even more complicated — all of the other people who would make great volunteers also personally know John. He has been deeply involved and a part of many groups here, and was even part of a volunteer campaign to raise funds for our organization a few years ago. So, on one hand, I really need volunteers, and I plan on asking the groups he’s part of if they would be interested. I would have to very purposefully avoid asking him, and at some point I think he would approach us to ask about volunteering in this particular area. And my boss and her boss recognize that I need volunteers and think John would, for all his faults, still be a very enthusiastic addition. I am just dreading the thought of training him. I can totally see him giving patronizing suggestions on my training, constantly trying to assert his own ideas and opinions, having trouble taking directions from me, and trying to prove that he should be working here. I am stuck. I would appreciate any thoughts you have on this! I wouldn’t ask someone to volunteer who has already demonstrated that they’re likely to be a problem. Managing volunteers is hard enough as it is; there’s no point in inviting problems into the job. Based on what John has already shown you about himself on more than one occasion, he’s likely to take up a lot of your time and energy. He’s going to give you lessons you don’t need, attempt to do work outside of his role, and quite possibly question your directions to him and your competence. As badly as you might need volunteers, I can’t see taking that on. If John weren’t interested in volunteering, you’d find other options, right? So move straight to finding them now. It sounds like that’s your preference but you’re concerned about your boss and her boss’s interest in bringing him on anyway. Have you told them directly that you don’t want him volunteering and why? Or have you more danced around the edges of it? If you haven’t already, try saying directly, “I’ve given this a lot of thought and it’s my strong preference not to have John volunteer. Based on my experiences with him, I think he will take up a lot of time and energy to manage and be a disruptive presence. I’d rather work on recruiting other volunteers.” It’s possible that if you, the person who’d be dealing with him most, say explicitly that you don’t want to do it, they’ll defer to you. Or they might not! But it’s worth finding out. You can also point out that if John becomes a problem, it’ll be far more difficult politically to fire him from volunteering than it would be to just never invite him in the first place. You can fire volunteers, of course. But when you’re already anticipating problems before even approaching the person, that’s a bad sign. (If your manager does insist you invite him to volunteer, though, try to get her agreement on how you’ll handle it if problems arise — and her clear agreement that you’ll have the authority to fire him if things go badly.) If John approaches you himself about volunteering at some point, there are a few ways you can handle that: * You can thank him but tell him you’re all set for volunteers for now (if you can credibly say that; obviously this won’t work if he sees you’re still actively recruiting others). * You can slow-pedal his involvement to the point of inaction, i.e., “Great, I’ll put you on our list and will let you know if we have a project come up that would be a good fit.” * You can let him “apply” to volunteer and not select him. If he asks why you didn’t select him, you can refer to a competitive process with a lot of interest. (Again, only if you can do this credibly based on what he might be seeing in the groups you’re recruiting from.) * If the volunteer work is relatively low level, you can give him a version of the truth: “Our sense from our interview with you is that you’re looking to do relatively high-level work and our volunteers do mainly clerical support. If something comes up that’s more aligned with your interests, I’ll let you know!” (Or if you can stomach it, say “more aligned with your skills” — he might like that.) Also, are your boss and her boss even right that John would be a great ambassador? This is someone who rambles, doesn’t pay attention to cues, uses too much jargon, doesn’t answer direct questions, and is condescending to others. Those are not great traits for ambassadors for your organization, totally aside from how much of a pain he might be to manage. You may also like:why can't I get feedback about why I was rejected for a job?what's up with this patronizing rejection letter?can I ask a rejected job candidate on a date? { 294 comments }
names that make a religious statement, HR keeps sending anxiety-provoking emails, and more by Alison Green on May 19, 2021 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. Names that make a religious statement I was reading an article about unusual baby names and two of the names included were “Christ is the Lord” and “Jesus is our Savior.” If, when these kids grow up, they continue to go by their full first names, how would that be handled in a work environment? It’s their legal name so they obviously have a right to be referred to by it, but wouldn’t their coworkers have a right to not make a religious statement they don’t believe in? I would have no problem calling someone Christ, but Christ is the Lord feels very different. I don’t know how the law would handle this one! Possibly it would be considered a required legal accommodation to let people shorten the names to “Jesus” or “Christ” so they didn’t have to say words contrary to their faith or lack thereof. On the other hand, I can also imagine a situation where it becomes just their name in your mind and you stop hearing the individual words or their normal meaning. (Realistically, I am semi-confident this won’t often come up as an issue, as those kids are likely to adapt their names themselves by the time they’re adults — as do most people with four-word first names — unless they have been raised to Make A Religious Point.) 2. HR keeps sending vague, anxiety-provoking emails I work at a mid-sized nonprofit that finally hired HR personnel for the first time. She has over a decade of HR experience and is well-versed in the nonprofit sector. However, she is not very tactful, nor is she open to suggestions. Over the past two months, she has sent numerous emails that just say, “We need to meet at (insert time and date) to discuss something.” They’re so vague I have to double-check that they aren’t phishing attempts, and when I ask her for more context, she declines and says “we can discuss further in person.” In our last unplanned and opaque meeting, I told her that I find these emails unsettling and anxiety-inducing and that it would be helpful to get some kind of context so I can prepare/feel more at ease. She responded by laughing at me and told me something like, “Ugh, people always think the worst about HR. I’m trying to fight that stereotype” and then changed the subject. Was my request unreasonable? I not only felt dismissed, but also embarrassed asking for something and getting laughed at. Should I relay my feedback to my manager and see if feedback through official channels is better received? No, your request wasn’t unreasonable. This HR person is failing at her goal of making people think well of HR. There might be legitimate reasons why she can’t give you a topic heads-up in advance, but then she should explain that, not laughingly dismiss your request. How much capital/standing/influence/seniority do you have relative to her? If a fair amount, you could go back and say, “I raised this before and you didn’t seem to take it seriously, so I want to reiterate that I prefer a heads-up about meeting topics when you ask to meet. Can you please do that going forward?” You could add, “I think you’ll find a lot of people prefer that.” But if you don’t have the capital to deal with her directly yourself, then yes, it’s worth letting your manager know the HR person is laughing at employee requests. 3. Should I give feedback on an overly involved application process? I saw a job yesterday that I liked the look of. The application process was a form (fair enough, some places don’t want resumes) but some of the questions on the form made me wonder if this company is asking more at this point than they should. They wanted a complete employment history “from leaving secondary school onwards.” I’m 40 years old, it would take me hours to list that, and do they really need to know that I worked at a supermarket between age 17 and 19, and then in a factory for a few weeks?! Then it asked for “all gaps in employment during this period, and their reasons.” I don’t really want to divulge that I left a job in 2006 that was seriously affecting my mental health, and had a further three months off with depression, nor that I had another year off work at the end of my maternity leave while my daughter was small. I feel these are things that will create bias against me in my application. Finally, it asked for three references and wanted to know whether all of these could be contacted prior to first interview. I know this is standard further down the process, but I don’t really want my referees bothered without good reason, especially as I’m applying for lots of roles at the moment. I don’t mind most of this being asked at interview (apart from the maternity question), but it seemed very intrusive at the first application stage, like they wanted to know far more about me than would be necessary for recruitment purposes. I will probably give this one a wide berth, but should I bring this to the attention of the agency promoting the job, or is this a normal (if very involved) process? Yeah, that’s overkill. It sounds like they’re using an old-timey application from days of yore and haven’t adapted it to fit what they actually need to evaluate candidates at this stage of the process and in 2021. They don’t need to know every job you’ve held going back to high school (!) and they don’t need every person to account for every single gap. If they have a question about a particular gap, they can ask that candidate directly. Acting as if any gap in providing labor, even gaps of a month or two, requires explanation is bizarre and not aligned with what good employers care about. And asking to contact references before you’ve even been invited to interview — no. (And a huge waste of their time if they really did that.) It’s possible they’re just using a horribly outdated form. Or maybe this is the stuff they put weight on when they hire, who knows. Anyway, I’d just move on — no need to spend time explaining this to them … unless you’re itching to address it, in which case go for it. You could be doing other job seekers a favor. (In the early days of this site, I encouraged more of that kind of feedback to employers because as a hiring manager, I wanted to hear it! 14 years of writing this column has made me more cynical about employers, but there is a chance someone will listen to you.) 4. Interviewer had no available slots — should I have waited until one opened up? I recently applied for a job and heard back a week or so later from a recruiter wanting to set up a phone call. He sent a scheduling link, but it showed no open time slots over the next several weeks. I emailed him back to let him know, and he responded (sounding annoyed) that he could try and make something work. I sent my availability and never heard back. Now I’m wondering if I was supposed to just periodically check the link to see if spots opened up in the future, as opposed to returning the email directly. I honestly thought it was a mistake in the scheduling software. Is this some new hiring trend I’m unaware of? I’d love to know how to respond in case this happens again. Nah, he probably just didn’t realize all the slots were booked up. He shouldn’t have sounded annoyed with you about it, but he was likely annoyed with the situation, not with you personally. It was rude of him not to get back to you after that, but I’d bet since he’s not used to have to schedule anything manually it slipped through the cracks (or he just had enough solid candidates lined up and by that point figured he didn’t need more interviews, which is a thing that happens.) You handled it fine. 5. Telling interviewers I’m leaving my new job because of laxness over Covid I recently began a job that I’d been so excited about. My one reservation was about COVID-19 regulations (I live in an area where many people have never taken it seriously) but I was assured in the interview process that everyone wears masks and social distances. I came in to my first day to find about a 50% masking rate, no social distancing, and one coworker who seems to actively enjoy getting in my personal space because of how uncomfortable it makes me. I can’t stress enough how disturbing the dismissiveness about it all was, and I would never have accepted this offer had I understood how poorly these protocols were followed. My attempts to raise concerns were ignored. And so I did what I never thought I would do and began trying to find a new job almost immediately after starting one. I’ve had two interviews, but both times the interviewers asked about why I was leaving my new position so soon and I found myself becoming unprofessional-levels of frustrated about the situation. This is all extremely upsetting to me and talking about it makes me more emotional than I’d like to be during a job interview. I’ve been trying to strike a balance between expressing that these are serious factors affecting my decision to leave so early into a new job (and make sure they know I’m not just a job-hopper) without sounding too negative about my current employer. I’m especially worried that if I go too far into details they’ll think I’m lying because of just how nonchalantly this is handled. Do you have any advice or scripts on how to walk that line? They’re not likely to think you’re lying, because what you’re describing is really common. But you don’t need to get into details and make the case for it being bad enough! All you need to say is, “They’re not adhering to safety protocols like masking and social distancing, and I’m looking for a company that is being more careful about safety during the pandemic.” That’s it! That said, this is going to be complicated by the CDC’s new guidance that people who have been vaccinated don’t need to mask or distance in most situations — something that wasn’t the case when you sent in this letter 12 days ago. If their in-office staff has all been vaccinated, they may not be enforcing those protocols anymore either. You may also like:my new company wants me to change my nameMicrosoft is removing the user names from its creepy "productivity score"our summer intern won't use first names { 673 comments }
am I the only one excited to return to the office? by Alison Green on May 18, 2021 A reader writes: On your blog, we’ve heard from people who’ve been working from home and are afraid to return to the office. We’ve also heard from people who’ve been going into work for all or most of the pandemic and find it hard to sympathize with those fears. But I’m wondering if there’s anyone else who misses the office and is excited to go back when the time comes. I get the sense that I might be an outlier in this regard, but I can’t be the only one. I had been at my job for about two months when the office closed, I’d barely gotten the chance to get to know many of my colleagues. My company recently announced its target date for fully vaccinated employees to voluntarily return and I was so happy! Am I alone in this? You are not alone. A lot of people are looking forward to going back! In some cases it’s because their space at home isn’t as easy to work from as their office is (because of space constraints or other factors). In some cases it’s because the work itself just isn’t as easily done from home. Some people miss the ease of working with colleagues who are all in the same location — being able to to have spontaneous conversations, seeing coworkers without scheduling it in advance via Zoom, and having the camaraderie and connection (and sometimes motivation) that come from all working in the same space. Some people, especially people early in their careers, feel like they’re missing out on some of the mentoring and development that happens more easily when you’re around more senior colleagues in-person. In many jobs, when you’re new you learn a lot just by overhearing other people’s conversations (like how someone handles a difficult client or approaches a tough problem or explains your organization’s stance on X or interviews a source) and much of that has been lost this past year. Some people just prefer working from the office and always have. Some people liked working from home for a while but are sick of it now. And for some people, going back to the office feels like a big step toward to normalcy, and that itself is the draw. It does seem like the narrative we hear the most has been that no one wants to go back, and maybe more people do feel that way than feel like you … but there are still a lot who are looking forward to returning. They’re either less vocal or getting less play in the media but they’re very much there. You may also like:should I apply for jobs I wouldn't normally be willing to commute to?I overheard my boss say that I'm not going to work out at this jobdo I have to wear a bra when I go back to the office? { 428 comments }
my nightmare former coworker is now a superstar by Alison Green on May 18, 2021 A reader writes: A few years ago, I managed a long-term project that my coworker, Jane, was working on. Jane was tricky to work with. In terms of technical skill, she did a few things exceptionally well but her overall performance was slightly below what I would have expected from somebody with her experience. But it was her soft skills which made her really difficult to work with — she missed deadlines missed, made careless mistakes, would sulk or throw tantrums if given negative feedback, and would simply not do tasks that she didn’t want to do. We haven’t had any contact since I left the company. But, after a “you must have worked with Jane when you were at X — isn’t she amazing!?’ conversation with an acquaintance, I looked her up and discovered she’s doing really well! She’s landed jobs and worked on projects that I would have loved to have worked on. I know I should say “good for her” and move on. I also know that anything could have happened in the intervening period to explain her career turnaround. But it’s completely thrown how I view myself. If I’m honest, I was far from perfect when I worked with Jane. Our mutual line manager, Lydia, was micromanaging the project we were working on. Think things like reassigning Jane to high stakes tasks she’d previously struggled with “because she’ll only learn if she’s given opportunities” but not letting me reorganize my own work so I could supervise Jane — and then flipping out at me 24 hours later when Jane had messed up. She also flipped back and forth between “I’ll handle Jane’s performance” (and then seemingly not doing anything) and “it’s your project — if you have a problem with Jane’s work, you deal with it.” At the time, I felt I remained professional. With hindsight, I must admit I did not do a great job at hiding my frustration. I don’t recall anything too extreme, but I think I came across as grouchy and curt. This could have hardly helped Jane’s performance. (And, in defense of Lydia, the “I know you’d like Jane to do X, but I was thinking Y because of Z” cases I was putting forward, which I thought sounded level-headed at the time, were probably coming across as just whingy by the end!) I’d framed this to myself as “sure, it wasn’t my finest hour but Jane (not to mention Lydia) was a nightmare.” But given Jane’s subsequent successes, the narrative is now “Jane’s a superstar and I must have really handled the situation terribly to get such a bad performance out of her.” Should a good manager be able to manage anybody regardless of the situation? Is it possible for a decent manager and a decent worker to just not work well together? You can read my answer to this letter at New York Magazine today. Head over there to read it. You may also like:how to coach an employee on soft skillsmy boss asked me if she should fire my coworker and then threw me under the buswe're not supposed to tell our manager about coworkers' mistakes { 131 comments }
my condescending coworker tries to take over my work and is a disruptive know-it-all by Alison Green on May 18, 2021 A reader writes: I work for a large company where employees very often contribute to community resources, either as part of their paid work or as volunteers. (Think open source software, but it’s not that.) Because this work is important to our business (and there are legal considerations), I work on the team that manages the rules around this work. It’s very rewarding and interesting, and the team is collegial and full of smart, kind people. We get to work with people across the company and across the world. I really enjoy it and feel lucky to have this job. Someone not on my team or in my division who regularly volunteers to do this work on their own time is becoming a serious problem. He (let’s call him Aloysius) is active in an external volunteer project he started before joining the company. The project directly relates to my area of expertise and he spends a lot of time asking people across the company to donate resources or work hours to the project. The problem is … it’s *my job* to create resources for this kind of work. At first I tried to work with the group that Aloysius champions, but unfortunately he exhibited some behaviors that violated our rules for working with external groups (not harassment, but insensitive comments). He also blocked plans to set up enforcement of a code of conduct in this group, calling it “a waste of time.” This led us to withdraw our sponsorship, and Aloysius had to have a discussion with HR. Aloysius has very grandiose plans (multi-year road maps), sends around poorly-written “thought leadership” presentations, and uses hyperbolic language (“we need to make Company the standard-bearer in this space,” “we will be heroes”). He recently set up a meeting with more than 30 people (!!) to talk about (among other things) how to lobby leadership to carry out this agenda. If I give critical feedback on his plans or decline his suggestions on how to do my work the way he thinks it should be done, he escalates questions five or six (!!) levels above me, to senior management who, frankly, do not care and who bounce the questions back to me to deal with (because it’s a very small part of what the org does, and because it’s MY JOB). Oftentimes Aloysius sends these messages because he does not understand the legal implications of the company policies around this work. We are about the same age and I actually have more work experience and a higher title (and recognition in the field), but Aloysius treats me like a very junior person and often “suggests” that I take on grunt work on his pet projects. Aloysius will send emails to me “reminding” me that a project I’m working on was originally his idea (!). (Think: making a checklist for some volunteer tasks, not some brilliant innovation.) He asks for status updates on things I am working on (since he wants to ask for the output to be donated to his project). I have been brushing off his suggestions and inquiries, and am spending a lot of time with people across the org who have been the targets of his insistent requests. (“Aloysius is very enthusiastic, but …”) I copied his manager on his most recent and egregious escalation. (“You keep asking this question, which we have answered. The answer will not change, please stop asking.”) The manager did not respond to me, and Aloysius’s behavior hasn’t changed. Is it worth it to have a meeting with this person where I tell him his behavior is disruptive and that it’s reflecting poorly on him and his volunteer org? Anything else I can try, or should I just wait for Aloysius to self-destruct? Or am I just being unreasonably annoyed by this waste of time and energy and should laugh it off? It’s no surprise that you’re a woman and Aloysius is a man. That’s not to say this dynamic never emerges with other gender configurations, but it’s oh so common for women to end up fending off the unsolicited, poorly conceived contributions of men who are overstepping their roles. That’s all I’m going to say about that because I am so tired of having to talk about sexism all the time, but it’s there. Anyway. Yes, I think you should meet with him and tell him he’s being disruptive and counterproductive. Lay out what you do want to see from him so it’s not all “don’t do this” … but do give it a shot. You might need to talk with his boss as well. You can wait and see if the conversation with Aloysius changes anything first, but I’m fairly skeptical that it will and at some point you’ll need to enlist his boss in shutting it down. And even if she doesn’t shut it down, she should still be aware that he’s being so disruptive (and patronizing!) because those are areas of development she should be addressing with him. (Normally it’s courteous to give people a chance to fix a problem themselves before you talk to their manager, but in this case his behavior is so over-the-top that it’s reasonable to give his boss a heads-up now that it’s happening, paired with “I’m speaking with him about this too and wanted to let you know.”) You might also decide that in some cases it’s more effective to let him do things like escalate questions six levels above you because (a) it doesn’t reflect on you that he doesn’t understand how things work and (b) when those executives bounce his questions back to you, it gives you an opportunity to say to him, “Jane sent this back to me because it’s my job to decide things like X and Y. Is there a reason you sent it so many levels up instead?” You can also try being blunter when he’s really out of line. If he suggests you take on grunt work for his projects, feel free to look surprised or confused and say, “No, that not the type of thing I work on” or “it sounds like that’s better suited for a more junior role” or “that’s something you should ask an assistant about” or whatever fits the context. (That’s going to feel snotty, but he clearly needs this stuff spelled out for him. And when someone is being this patronizing to you, sometimes you need to be quite pointed if you want them to hear what you’re saying.) If he asks for status updates on something he doesn’t have the standing to ask about, it’s okay to say, “Why do you ask?” or “I’m juggling a bunch of things right now but that’s on the list” or otherwise decline to function as if he’s entitled to reports on your work. You can also continue cc’ing his manager on some of the most egregious/annoying stuff, but I wouldn’t do much more of that until you’ve spoken with her directly about what’s going so she has context to place it in. (Suddenly getting cc’d on a lot of messages from someone outside her team could otherwise be a little odd, especially if she’s not reading between the lines to see what’s happening.) I do think you have to be careful about one thing: Sometimes when a person is crossing the line as much as Aloysius is, you can end up wanting to shut them down completely. Be careful to recognize what portions of this actually are okay for him to be doing (within the structure your company has set up for this work and within the political realities there too). It can be easy to get so frustrated with someone who’s behaving like this that you inadvertently shut down too much of what they’re doing … which can then make you look inappropriately heavy-handed to other people (including management above you), who won’t necessarily have the full context and who may rightly think, “Well, sure, shut down X but don’t tell him he can’t do Y.” And that can detract from the credibility you need to address the rest of it. Given that, I’d try to be rigorous about assessing what pieces of this are annoying but ultimately things you can live with versus what is genuinely disruptive and needs to stop. For example, maybe it’s fine for him to keep sending around poorly-written “thought leadership” presentations and using hyperbolic language because no one pays much attention to that anyway (and to the extent that they do, it just reflects badly on him), but he needs to stop circulating grandiose multi-year road maps because that’s work you’re charged with doing yourself and it’s explicitly outside of his purview. I’m curious, too, about what kind of response you’re seeing to Aloysius from others. If people seem annoyed/dismissive/taken aback, that might be a sign that there’s not a lot you need to do here because it’s likely to take care of itself in time (or, at least, that how much energy you put into dealing with it can be based largely on how much you do or don’t feel like taking it on). You may also like:how can I get my employee to stop condescending to me?new coworker is a rude know-it-allis the COO's daughter trying to take my job? { 215 comments }
my boss excludes me from social events, I’m leaving my job after promising not to, and more by Alison Green on May 18, 2021 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. My manager excludes me from social events I have a manager who likes to keep things professional with her direct reports, but she takes it a little too far. She’s very cold and non-communicative in general (her general management skills are another issue) but the biggest thing is her approach to socializing. She is really friendly with a lot of people in the office and is a key part of the only real social group that like to go out to pub quizzes, Friday drinks, etc. With them, she is really outgoing and friendly. However, she likes to keep things professional with me, her direct report, and the way she does that is just by kind of excluding me from these events. She makes it clear she doesn’t want me to be there if I tag along (I’m friendly with others in the group so get invited by them) and generally acts really standoffish. I like to have a professional boundary with my manager too, but wouldn’t a better way to enforce this be to not attend every single event so I get a chance to make friends too? I think there’s an element of “she was here first,” but I want to socialize as well. It’s really affecting my morale. Is there anything I can do about this? There’s no concrete behavior I can point to, just an attitude, but I know I’m right because someone who used to be managed by her told me she used to be even worse, and she told them outright that they shouldn’t try to sit with her group at lunch and didn’t introduce them to anyone. She sounds like she has some maturing to do. When you’re a manager, the job requires that you prioritize your role as a manager over your desire to be friends with people at work. You can’t call dibs on particular friends, exclude people, or be part of a clique. It sounds like her social relationships are getting in the way of her management responsibilities. If you’d like to socialize with those same people, the best approach is probably just to initiate events yourself. If you’re the one organizing drinks, etc., she can’t complain that you’re going since you’re the one who put it together. You probably do need to accept that you won’t be able to go to everything you might like to go to if she’ll be weird about it, but organizing things yourself should let you build relationships without giving up all control to her. (Or, of course, you can go to the other events and ignore that she’s being standoffish, but I’d be concerned about getting into a power struggle with your boss. It’s not a good thing to have your boss actively resenting you, even when they’re in the wrong.) 2. Should I tell my toxic former company about my toxic former boss’s other job? This month, I secured a new role that allowed me to quit my toxic job. My direct boss, Larry, was one toxic cog in a toxic system. He would often acknowledge the toxicity and mismanagement of the organization at large, venting to us and dumping his frustrations and issues on us. When I told him of my resignation, he was supportive, congratulating me on “getting out.” Then he shared that he had been working at another full-time job for four months and would be resigning himself on the last day of my notice period. He asked me to keep it in confidence, which I did for to preserve the relationship. But I was really uncomfortable knowing he was working this other job, especially since a major complaint we (his team) had about him was that he talked about how busy he always was, but never had any tangible outputs and was often unavailable when we needed him. Our employee handbook did specify that holding other positions that interfered with one’s availability and output at our company was forbidden. Well, the last day of my notice period came and went and he didn’t resign. A few days ago, I googled him to see if he had updated his LinkedIn to reflect a new role and found that he had not, but I did find a publicly available announcement of his new job. I checked with my old team to see if he had resigned yet — nope. It would feel *so good* to send this announcement to my old company. I’d love for my old boss to be confronted with his unethical behavior, and I’d love for my old company to see what kind of dysfunction their mismanagement is causing. But I don’t work there anymore, and my old boss’s absenteeism and frustratingly poor management isn’t my problem anymore, so there’s no real reason for me to do this at this point. I could offer the justification that my old boss has asked me to lie by omission to help him cover up unethical behavior and I’m not comfortable with it (which I feel is true), but fundamentally I just want to do *something* about this situation. Is it a bad professional move to out him? Is it unethical? Or would it be a justified move after all I dealt with? And if I did it, is doing it anonymously okay? I don’t think it’s unethical to tell the truth about something that’s hurting other people. And you didn’t ask Larry to confide in you; he burdened you with this knowledge on his own without checking to see if you’d be comfortable keeping his secret. I don’t love the idea of sending anything anonymously because that makes it feel like you’re doing something sketchy when you’re not. Is it an option to simply share the info with someone on your old team and let them decide now to handle it from there (since it’s much more relevant to them than to you at this point)? But there’s also an argument for just walking away from this mess. You got out, so let yourself be fully out without your old company’s issues taking up room in your head anymore. 3. I’m leaving my job after promising not to For the past year, my full-time employer has allowed me to work a flexible schedule so that I can teach a college class part-time. My boss has been generally supportive, but when I initially asked for approval to start teaching, my boss said, “Yes, as long as you promise not to leave us for your teaching job.” My boss has made this “joke” a couple of other times since then. I always laugh it off and say, “Nope, just a fun hobby!” but teaching is actually my dream job, and now, after using my employer’s flexibility to help me gain teaching experience, I am leaving them for my teaching job. I know that I need to do what is best for me, but I can’t help but feel guilty. I also worry that my experience will cause them to be less accommodating to others in the future. Do you have any advice for giving notice without burning bridges? So many managers make jokes like this without realizing that it’s probably not landing as a joke with the recipient. I think I’ve probably done it myself in the past, although I wouldn’t now. With managers who are otherwise reasonable people, it’s usually intended as a light-hearted way to express affection and appreciation, without recognizing it’s going to make people feel just as you do now. Sometimes, of course, there’s a layer of truth in the joke — it really does mean “I will be upset if you leave us after this.” But when that’s the case, the manager should be explicitly talking through what they want from you in exchange for their flexibility so that it’s all out in the open and communicated through real conversation (and a written agreement if they’re really serious about it). It’s not your fault your boss didn’t do that. It’s understandable to find it awkward now though! You can acknowledge that when you resign by saying something like, “I didn’t expect this to happen, but I’ve realized I really want to do this work full-time and I’ve been offered an opportunity to do that.” You can also say, “I really appreciate that you gave me the space to experiment with this” to help counter any “she doesn’t even appreciate what I offered her” narrative forming in your boss’s head. She might be a little miffed, but no reasonable boss will consider this bridge-burning. People leave for other jobs! It happens. It’s normal. They might be less accommodating to others in the future, but hopefully the lesson they’ll take away is that if they really want specific things in exchange for offering flexibility, they need to negotiate them more directly. 4. Should my resume explain what kind of work my company does? I’ve been job hunting and have gotten a few interviews, so I think my resume is in at least decent shape. However, I have talked to two headhunters who have reached out, and in each case they assumed from my resume that the company I currently work for is a fund administrator. This is incorrect; my company does outsourced accounting for fund clients, which is very different work. I’m now wondering if the companies I have applied to have also assumed that my company is a fund administrator. In my industry, I could see the headhunters possibly assuming this based on the name of my company. But also, I would think you could tell that I am not a fund administrator based on the job description I included. Also, one headhunter kept forgetting key details from our first conversation, and I had to point out to him I did indeed have a certain skill even though it was in my first clearly written bullet point on my resume. And the other claimed he was very familiar with my company, but obviously he is not if he did not even know what type of service it provides. So maybe they assumed wrong about my company due to lack of attention and time spent looking at my background. Do you think it’s worth it for me to somehow clarify on my resume that my company is not a fund administrator? How would you recommend doing this? As a general rule, people don’t need blurbs on their resume explaining what each employer does — generally employers will be more interested in what you do (or did). But when you’re finding that people are misunderstanding the context in which you did your work, or when it’s just highly relevant to being able to explain your accomplishments, it makes sense to include a (very brief) line about what the company does. You can do that by either (a) listing it right after the company’s name like in example 1 below or (b) incorporating it into a description of your work like in example 2. That said, you will always encounter recruiters who skimmed and missed important info or didn’t retain it or who are over-confident about their understanding of your work. That’s just part of the process, and no amount of explanation on your resume will ever ward that off completely. Example 1 llama spiritual guide, Llamas United, June 2018 – present Nonprofit encouraging llamas’ spiritual development through music and ancient rituals * accomplishment * accomplishment * accomplishment Example 2 llama spiritual guide, Llamas United, June 2018 – present * Led seven-person communications team for nonprofit encouraging llamas’ spiritual development through music and ancient rituals * accomplishment * accomplishment 5. Dress clothes for bigger men As the pandemic is starting to wind down, I’m beginning to job hunt to get out of my current work situation. I’m starting to interview where the attire is business professional (this is my first time having to think about a business professional attire in the workplace). I’m having trouble finding affordable and fashionable clothes as a bigger guy. I’ve tried on clothes at some retailers but I find that most of the time they either fit poorly because they aren’t made for fat people, or I don’t feel like myself in the clothes. As someone who is queer, it’s really important that I show off the best parts of my personality and that I look and feel professional in my work attire. I was wondering if you could ask the readers if they know of any affordable retailers or shops that specialize in fashionable clothes for fat people. This process is really putting a damper on my self-esteem since I’m absolutely desperate to get out of my current job situation. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I’m happy to throw this out to readers! You may also like:why can't I wear shorts to work?my employee drastically changes her appearance in the middle of the workdaymy work clothes are revealing more than I intended { 368 comments }