my work friends are being weird about me resigning, pushy recruiters want “salary confirmation,” and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My work friends are being weird about me resigning

My question is about leaving my current (non-dream) job. I was hired at my current company at the same time as three other people. We are all just out of grad school with the same degree and around the same age, so we immediately hit it off. They become my “group” at work: I’ve become close friends with one of the women, and while I don’t often see the other two outside of work, we stick together at work events and go out for lunch. You know, work friends. The company that we work for is dysfunctional on a lot of levels (hence the job search), so that collegiality was one of the few bright spots of coming to work for the past six years.

I didn’t expect wailing and gnashing of teeth when I told my friends I was leaving, but I did expect…something. Congratulations, at least. Instead, I got a bunch of sour comments about my new company (“I’ve heard they’re really disorganized,” etc.). My last day is fast approaching, so I finally texted everyone suggesting a goodbye lunch or happy hour. They all agreed, but we can’t settle on a date because everyone’s too “busy.” I put that in quotation marks because some of the reasons they’ve offered for not being able to make a certain date or time are laughably bad.

I’m getting paranoid (maybe I’m annoying and people only pretended to like me!), but rationally, I know I haven’t imagined our friendship. So what gives? Is this a normal way to act when someone leaves? Should I say something, or brush it off and focus on my new job?

It sounds like the behavior of people who are unhappy with their jobs and frustrated that you’re escaping and they’re not. It’s an immature way to handle that situation, but that’s what sounds most likely.

It’s also true that it’s pretty common for work friendships not to last once you change jobs. Sometimes they do, but frequently it will turn out that the thing that bonded you together was work, and once you no longer have that in common, the bond fades, often quite quickly (not usually ahead of your last day though, so that may or may not be what’s happening here).

Still, though, if it’s really bothering you and you’re having trouble brushing it off, why not ask the person you’re closest to? Explain what you’ve said here and see what her take is on it. (She’s actually the one I’d expect more of a reaction from since you’re genuinely close outside of work, so it’ll be interesting to hear her perspective.)

2. Recruiters being pushy about “salary confirmation”

I have been dealing with IT recruiters lately, and they have mostly started conversations with “what are your salary requirements?” immediately after just giving me the name and location of the job! I make it a point to ask follow-up questions, have them send me the job description, and make sure they understand I will have several considerations to take into account, before addressing the range with which I’m comfortable. I usually throw out a high number just to see what they come back with.

Recently during this conversation, the recruiter asked if I would be interested in a $10 less per hour figure than I had thrown out — much to my surprise. I said it’s close enough to start an application process. But here’s the thing — she immediately sent an email asking for a “salary confirmation agreement” and has called me repeatedly to get me to respond “I agree” to an email doc that says “I agree to this salary for this position.” She called me three times within two hours, and re-sent the email another time. This kind of rushing rings many alarm bells for me, so I’ve paused completely.

Several other recruiters have also sent, or wanted to send similar emails — “So, are you saying for $x/hour you are interested? Can I send you a salary confirmation email?”

Is this…normal? I don’t know what about it worries me so much, but I just don’t trust anyone that hurries me!

Nooooo, not normal. Run away, run away. Someone who tries to get you to sign away your standing to negotiate — to commit to a salary before you’ve been to an interview and had a chance to learn about the job and the company and before you’ve had a chance to look at the full package of an offer (like benefits, which matter greatly) — is someone who wants to lock you into acting against your own self-interest. That is a huge danger sign, and those are not recruiters you want to work with.

3. Running into students’ parents at the gym

I’m a school teacher. I’m committing myself to a daily workout at the gym once the school year starts to keep up my strong summer momentum.

Should I be at all concerned or embarrassed about running into parents of my students at the gym? I don’t think it should be an issue, as I have a right to life my life, but the gym can be an awkward place — more awkward than, say, running into a parent at the grocery store or a restaurant.

Nah. I mean, I wouldn’t hang out naked chatting with them in the locker room, but beyond that I wouldn’t worry at all.

4. Putting a vegan mentorship volunteer role on my resume

I’m vegan. I’m happy and proud of that fact, but I’m also aware that it rubs some people the wrong way. A lot of people have never met a vegan before, and so their only impressions of vegans are negative stereotypes. When I tell them that I’m vegan, some people even start arguments trying to prove me wrong. This is why I like to get to know people a bit before I tell them that I’m vegan. Once they get to know me as a person, they can’t dismiss me as irrational, extreme, or whatever other image they have built of vegans in their head.

Should I include my experience mentoring new vegans on my resume? The mentorship program is a 22-day vegan challenge, with a preparation period and a graduate group. My role as a mentor/admin is to post the daily challenges, encourage participants, monitor the group to make sure that participants and other mentors follow the rules, speak one-on-one to participants and mentors who are struggling with the rules, refer health-related questions to the challenge’s dieticians, and to provide reliable, positive advice both from a practical and emotional perspective. It’s an international group, and so I often have to do research to find out what products are available in a different country or to translate my advice into French or Spanish. Going vegan is difficult not just because it involves changing habits, but also because friends and family are not always supportive. I think that providing emotional support in this area is the most important part of my position.

I’ve been volunteering with the online mentorship group for nearly a year and feel that it has greatly improved my skills in communication and leadership, and is evidence of my initiative and willingness to give back to the community. All of these skills are important in my field, but I worry that potential employers will read the word “vegan” and my resume will get thrown in the trash. Do you have any advice?

It would be fine to include it a Volunteer or Community Service section, but I wouldn’t devote more than a line to it, unless you’re light on professional experience that demonstrates these same abilities. (I also wouldn’t play up the emotional support piece, unless you’re applying for jobs where that’s especially relevant.)

For what it’s worth, few employers are going to trash your resume because it includes the word “vegan.” I have firsthand experience with people’s weirdness about veganism, but it generally doesn’t extend to rejecting job candidates over it. So that’s less the issue here and more that it’s not going to read as substantial work experience in the way you’d want something to if you’re giving it serious resume real estate.

5. Is it weird to say “my staff”?

At home I’ll tell my girlfriend something about how my day was at work and I’ll say, “Oh yes, a bunch of my staff said to watch Stranger Things” or “I met with my staff about our website” or “My Queen of Teapots, Ele, said … about what we’re doing.” My girlfriend says that it sounds pretty terrible to say things like “my staff” since it sounds like I own them and that it’s weirdly hierarchical, but I’m terribly confused as to what I should say then! I’m the head of a department and have several direct reports and almost 20 people in the department.

“My staff” — and “my team,” “my group,” and “my department” — are normal things to say, especially when you’re talking to someone outside of your team. If you’re talking to your staff themselves, I’d generally go with “our team” or something like that … but “my staff” when explaining who you’re talking about isn’t all that different from the “my” in “my family,” “my friends,” or “my hairdresser.”

my boss said inappropriate things about me to a reference-checker

A reader writes:

I started job searching in earnest last year for a number of reasons — mainly, no raises despite glowing performance reviews over the past several years, no chance of a title change despite increased responsibilities, and no opportunity to move into a better position. (It’s a small organization.) I recently interviewed for a position I’m really excited about, and last week I found out that the employer was calling my references. Hooray!

I’ve kept my boss in the loop on my job search, so he was a reference as well. He’s pretty upset about my leaving because we work well together and I’m a good employee, but he’s been mostly supportive, despite the grumbling, and I knew he’d say good things about my job performance.

He had the reference call last week, and he wandered into my office afterward to let me know how it went. I was pretty horrified when he told me that he’d told the hiring manager — one of my would-be immediate bosses — that if they made me an offer, he’d make a counter-offer and it would be a “battle.” He also “jokingly” told her I was a drug addict. He said she laughed (I’m guessing awkwardly) about the drug joke, and that she responded to the counter-offer comment by saying that their department had recently lost a great employee as well, so she understood. Unfortunately, I don’t know what tone he made the mention of a counteroffer in — whether he was lighthearted or serious.

I was angry about all of it. First, the drug addiction joke — my anger over that doesn’t need explanation. But I was also incensed that he mentioned a counter-offer to her at all, when I have no intention of taking one (though gee, it’s funny how an organization can scrape up money or a new job title right when an employee is about to leave and no sooner…), and it’s really none of his business to mention it anyway! I would want to save talk of a counter-offer with my current boss, at which point I’d just turn it down. I’m sure he was trying to emphasize that I’m so awesome that he’d “fight” to keep me, and it’s great he thinks so highly of me, but I really didn’t want my potential employer to get the impression that I might try to use a counter-offer to get more money from them.

From the reference call the hiring manager had with a coworker after the one with my boss, it sounded like they were still excited about me despite the weirdness with my boss’s call, but what if (hypothetically) they’d been trying to decide between me and another candidate and ultimately pulled an offer to me because they didn’t want to get in some kind of bidding war?

It hasn’t even been a full week, so I’m not exactly panicking that there won’t be an offer coming, but I’m still pretty steamed. Am I right to be really annoyed about this? What should I do?

You’re absolutely right to be pissed off about it. Your boss made the reference call all about himself, when it’s not supposed to be about him at all. And while it sounds like the reference checker knew that he was joking about the drug addiction remark, that’s a ridiculous and wrong-headed joke to make on a reference call.

I don’t think you need to worry terribly about any of it, though. Employers are well aware that candidates’ current jobs might make counter-offers; it’s not like they’re going to be stunned or disturbed to learn that that’s a possibility. If it happens, it happens — they can deal with it. They know that candidates turn down offers for all sorts of reasons, and they know that counter-offers tend not to work on candidates who have made up their minds to leave for other reasons. So it’s very unlikely that they were thrown by his mention of that.

The way your boss conducted himself on this call did probably read as slightly loony to them — but that reflects on him, not on you.

I don’t think your boss is going to cost you a job offer here. That said, if you use him for a reference in the future, it would be worth saying, “Hey, I know you were joking around with what you told that other reference checker, but this is my livelihood and that makes me really nervous — so I’d really appreciate if you kept it serious with any other calls.”

my coworker is a Twitter troll

A reader writes:

I have a conundrum. A coworker of mine has said some pretty awful things on social media, and I don’t know what, if anything, to do about it.

I work with this person occasionally. When I was new and had to ask him a few questions about a project, I Googled him to check out his LinkedIn and so on, and the first thing that came up was his Twitter feed, with the company name in his bio. I added him to a list and went on with my day. In the past few months, though, his feed has turned into a fat-shaming Milo-Yiannopoulos-loving bro-fest. He removed the company’s name a few weeks ago — now it has something about “triggering supplicating millennial babies.” Ohhh kay. One of his most recent tweets crossed a major line for me: he used a homophobic slur, specifically to taunt people for being “too sensitive” online.

This guy is in a client-facing position and this Twitter feed is the first thing that comes up on a search for his name.

I don’t know what to do here. I find I’m still pretty upset by his taunt (which, I imagine, is by design), but really I barely know the guy — it’s more the knowledge that my company hired such a nasty person. Dude is a clear outlier, and he already got transferred out of one department for being …himself. I’ve removed him from my lists, naturally.

I feel like our PR folks need to be made aware, though, in case clients look him up and stumble across the hateful rhetoric and lack of judgment. It is a personal feed, but it’s also under his full, fairly unique name. I don’t know if I should confront him, given his broiness and general hateful attitudes – plus, I can avoid him at work, mostly. I also don’t want to remain silent in the face of hateful shit, but he doesn’t seem like the kind of guy who would take confrontation well. I don’t know if this is an HR thing, either — I can imagine that his tweeting will poison quite a few relationships.

Do I just need to let it go, try to avoid working with him, and move on? Confront him? Reporting him feels like tattling somehow, even though he’s the one who is being publicly awful and gross.

Most of the time I’m a pretty staunch advocate that what you do in your private life is your business. But that’s really only true as long as you’re not hurting anyone else. If you’re publicly spewing hateful, vile things about other people — and you’re doing it in this era’s equivalent of the town square — it’s fair game for an employer to have concerns about that.

That’s especially true when the employee in question has a client-facing job, and presumably has clients who belong to any number of the groups of people this guy is issuing slurs about. I mean, if you saw that your financial planner or your dentist was posting stuff like this online, would you happily continue taking your business to him? Most people wouldn’t, and that makes it reasonable for your employer to at least want to be aware of it.

And really, even if your co-worker weren’t in a client-facing job, it’s reasonable for an employer to have concerns about what kind of a working environment he might be creating for his colleagues — some of whom are presumably in the groups he’s insulting — and how well he’s able to work with them. (And it actually sounds like that already might have come up as an issue, if I’m interpreting your comment about his transfer correctly.)

All that said, before we go any further it’s reasonable to ask whether making this kind of thing fair game for employers means that we’re opening the door to meddling in other kinds of employee speech. Does it mean that an employer could take issue with an employee posting in favor of reproductive rights, for example, or health-care access? Does it mean that an employer could say “Well, clients will be uncomfortable knowing that you’re gay, so you need to stamp out all online references to your partner”? And if it doesn’t mean that, then why is it okay for employers to intervene when an employee is publicly advocating viewpoint X but not viewpoint Y?

Those are utterly valid questions and they’re important to ask, because if people have to fear employer reprisal, it could make them hesitant to advocate for social change, publicly support a particular candidate for election, or otherwise speak out on issues that are important to them. But in the case of your co-worker, we’re talking about hate speech and bigotry, not just any old political viewpoint that someone might not like. Hate speech and bigotry are different from normal political discourse; we’ve chosen to treat them differently as a society, and it’s reasonable to think that employers have standing to do that too.

So yes, most managers would say that it would be perfectly reasonable for you to give someone at your company a heads-up about this. I hear you that you’re worried about “tattling,” but I’d argue that that’s not really the right framework to use at work. In general, when you’re trying to figure out when a concern is worth raising to someone above you, the question to ask yourself is: How does this impact our work, and by how much? So “Jane posts on Facebook during the day” or “Cecil is always five minutes late” aren’t generally things you’d escalate, but it’s different when something truly does affect the organization’s work.

In this case, you’re not just personally annoyed by your co-worker’s views; you’re concerned about the impact that his posts may have on clients and people in your office. That’s a legit concern, and it’s one most bosses would want to hear about. If they don’t feel the need to act on it, then they won’t act on it. But if they are concerned about its potential impact on work and want to address it, you’ll simply have served as the conduit of information that (a) your company sees as a genuine work-related issue and (b) your co-worker is supplying quite publicly. (It’s not like you went snooping through his email and are forwarding private messages that he didn’t expect to have a broader audience.) And if they don’t end up acting, it will still be seen as a reasonable thing to have raised; they won’t view it like coming to them to report that your co-worker is hogging the microwave or something like that.

As for how to do it, you could simply say it this way: “This seems like a PR disaster waiting to happen, and I felt uncomfortable not bringing it to your attention in case it’s something you’d want to know about.”

I wouldn’t bother confronting your co-worker directly, though. That would make it more of a personal issue between the two of you (and he doesn’t sound terribly open to hearing alternate takes on his postings), and since you’re not in his management chain, you don’t have the authority to address it beyond that. If you happened to have a pretty good relationship with him, you could try saying something like, “Hey, have you considered that you might be turning off clients with your social-media posts?” or “You know, this is the first thing that comes up when you’re googled.” But absent any particular rapport with him, I’d leave it to people above you both to decide how to handle it. You shouldn’t have to convince or cajole him into addressing this, and you shouldn’t have to deal with his ire for confronting him about it (apparently you’d get called a “supplicating millennial baby”). Give your company a heads-up, and let them deal with it from there.

Originally published at New York Magazine.

Read an update to this letter here.

an employee’s boyfriend privately asked me to give her time off … and then things got even weirder

A reader writes:

So last week you had a boyfriend ask about reaching out to his girlfriend’s boss. I had to ask about being the boss in that kind of situation.

This summer, I invited nine college-age people to work a 10-week job at my organization. The team has done pretty well overall, but there have been serveral instances of (some of) them not knowing professional norms. Most of these we’ve taken in stride and provided feedback and a chance to repeat the skill in an improved way. So it’s been a good summer.

One of the team members who has had some missteps is away this week for her boyfriends’ family reunion. How she got this time off is a bit strange though, and I’m wondering what, if anything, to say to her when she returns. It all started with this Facebook message to me from her boyfriend:

“I don’t want to impose on anything at this point, but [girlfriend] knew about the family reunion back in May but wasn’t sure if she would get the job if she said she wanted to go with us to that. I know I have no power but I thought I’d try and appeal to your sentimental side and ask you if you might be willing to let her go to my family reunion with my family. We all were really hoping she could come and it would mean a lot to us. She is in an internship, one in which she’s busted her butt for and I believe she deserves a break. I don’t mean to stir the pot and I know I can’t force anything but I was hoping to appeal to the family side for you. If this could happen my family and I would love that. She doesn’t know I’m writing this and I don’t want her to because I’m just trying to help her not do it for her. Hope you have a great day.”

A few things to note:
1. This person had not asked me to attend the reunion; this was the first I heard of it.
2. This is a paid job, $15/hour, not an internship.
3. She hasn’t “busted her butt” — she has struggled more than the average amount for the nine-member group.

After receiving the Facebook message, I sat down with the staffer to say, “I got a note from boyfriend about a family reunion…were you wanting to attend that?” She was immediately embarrassed that he contacted me and insistent that she did not want to go to the reunion, so she told the boyfriend I wouldn’t approve the time off. I told her that if she wanted to attend, I’d hope she’d ask me so we could talk about whether that would be feasible. End of conversation.

Next, five days before reunion, staffer emails me: “A couple weeks ago, we talked about time off this upcoming week. (Boyfriend’s) family is having their family reunion and is inviting me to come. I would miss two days of work and would be back for the weekend. I understand that since this is short notice, it may not be possible. If you feel it would be better for me to stay, I completely understand that. Just thought I would ask.”

I reply: “If you think it’s important to go, that’s fine, and we can make things work here. Just be sure you are prepped for anything related to your projects, of course.” She does not reply, but does take the time off.

I was caught of guard by the timing and nature of the request. We were clear at hiring that this was a seasonal role with a start and stop date and clear hours, and an expectation to basically work that whole time. And I may have thought wrongly, but my sense was that if she couldn’t see why she shouldn’t email me, how would I make her see why I wouldn’t allow the time off?

Last piece: I learned while she was away this week that a) she did not make arrangements for her work to happen and b) she lied to another member of my team, saying she had asked weeks ago, over and over, and I wouldn’t let her have an answer. She told this team member this in a very exasperated way, making me look at a minimum discourteous to her for not responding.

How do I address this when she returns? The job ends next week, and I’ve given her (and the whole group) input as they go about other expectations and work quality. But this one is tripping me up a bit. (In part, I’m lost because our families have been connected for a long time; her mother and my father worked together in this same field. I respect her mother tremendously, so I’m caught off guard by this person’s lack of professionalism.)

What is the best move now, in your opinion?

Do you think it’s possible that she didn’t really want you to approve the time off at all, and was hoping that you’d say no when she requested it directly? She might have been hoping that you would assume that the earlier conversation was still in effect, where she told you she didn’t want to go and was telling her boyfriend that you wouldn’t let her.

In fact, given the background here — and that the boyfriend already showed little regard for professional boundaries (and relationship boundaries) — I even wonder if he insisted on her sending you that email and she knew he was going to see it.

That’s obviously not your responsibility to sort out, and you can’t be in the position of second-guessing requests from people who might be hoping you’ll say no so that they have a cover story for their partner. But because she’s young and new to working and because she’d earlier told you that she was using you as a cover story to get out of going, one option would have been to talk to her in person and say, “Just to be clear, I want to be sure you’ve changed your mind and you really do want me to approve this time off now?”

Again, not your responsibility to do that — just an option if you wanted to do it. (By the way, also not your responsibility: approving time off that you’d already made clear people couldn’t have during this short 10-week program. It would have been okay for you to stick with “no” if you wanted to.)

It also seems likely that she ended up using “I couldn’t get a clear yes from my manager” as a cover story not only for her boyfriend but with coworkers as well, which would explain how that got back to you. And that’s especially likely if any of the coworkers know the boyfriend, since in that case she would need to give them the same story she was giving him.

Anyway, as for what to do now: When she gets back, sit down with her and talk to her about all of it — the leaving without having her work covered, the telling people you gave her a hard time about the time off, and generally how to navigate this stuff professionally. It doesn’t need to be a stern chastising; you’re going for more of “hey, let’s talk about how employers generally want you to handle this kind of thing so you know for the future.”

As part of that conversation, it’s worth mentioning to her that typically significant others shouldn’t email your manager for this kind of thing … and depending on how the conversation is going, you might mention that while you don’t want to assume anything about her relationship, in some cases what her boyfriend did can be a flag for controlling and even abusive behavior. You can say, “I want to respect your privacy, but I also want you to know that if this is something you want help with, I can help put you in touch with resources to help.”

It’s possible that these are just young people who don’t quite realize how to navigate work boundaries professionally yet. It’s also possible that it’s something more troubling. It’s hard to know exactly what’s going on, but I think the approach above will cover all of your bases.

Read an update to this letter here.

workplace weight loss programs and eating disorders, giving a reference for a coworker who drinks heavily, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Workplace weight loss programs and eating disorders

My workplace just decided to do a casual team-wide (60 people) weight loss competition/event. Participation is voluntary and each participant puts money in the pot initially plus a dollar for every pound lost. The winner wins the pot at the end.

This came at me out of the blue, because I have an eating disorder, and I avoid those teammates who like to talk about their eating and diet habits all the time. But now everybody around me is talking about it all the time, and I thank god nobody has asked me if I am participating yet (everybody is doing it, not just overweight people but perfectly healthy people). This is seriously triggering and upsetting for me. I don’t want to go the the team manager and say “shut it down!” but is there something I can do to raise awareness that there are people with eating disorders around and this sort of thing is a problem? Without actually saying that that person is me, ideally.

You can absolutely say to your manager (or anyone else), “You know, this kind of competition and the frequent discussion of dieting that it generates is really problematic for people with eating disorders. Is there a way to tone it down or even reconsider it entirely, in light of that?” My bet is that they won’t call it off this time, but it might make them more sensitive to how and how often it’s being discussed, and it might get them not to do another in the future. But there’s also a chance that it will have no impact, at least in part because it may seem theoretical to them (“some people could…” as opposed to “people in this office definitely do…”).

Because of that, if you’re willing to confide in someone — either your boss or HR — that you personally are being impacted by this, you might have more of an effect. You shouldn’t have to do that, but the reality is that it might have much more of an impact.

Also, in the future, if you get a chance to speak up while the idea is still in the planning stages, it’ll often be easier to shut down at that point. You can say something like, “I’ve read that experts now discourage this kind of event because it’s so dangerous for people with eating disorders. And it leaves out people who don’t want to lose weight. How about we do a voluntary walking challenge or something else that isn’t tied to pounds lost?”

2. Giving a reference for a coworker who drinks heavily

A coworker of mine recently dropped from full-time to part-time hours by choice — he began taking partial Social Security benefits which limit the maximum number of hours worked per week. At the same time, our growing company was short on desk space, so he began working those hours from home. I probably worked in the office with him for about six months before his arrangement changed. His work is low-level but still in a critical workflow, and consistently reliable though not large in volume due to the limited hours he’s putting in.

This seems to be a good fit for him, and as far as I know he plans to continue working this way for the foreseeable future. He’s a nice person, and I still see him at work social events, where he has a reputation for imbibing substantially and often.

He recently emailed to let me know I had been listed on his references for another job he was applying for. This would be a live-in assistant for an elderly person with dementia. (He has no local family so moves around the city every few months, often house- or pet-sitting.) I am not a nurse or doctor, and don’t work in the medical field. I am not his supervisor. I do, however, rely in part on his work product to complete my tasks. He has no intention of quitting our company so I will need to continue to work with him.

Should I give a reference? If so, what should I say? I don’t feel like I can testify to how he would be as a caregiver, or as a direct report, and this is a job that I feel has a great degree of intimacy with someone who might not be able to speak for themselves.

If you took away the “imbibing substantially and often,” I’d say you should give him a reference that speaks to what you know of his work, while clearly explaining the caveats you gave here — you can’t speak to what he’d be like as a home care assistant, but just to his work as a teapot painter (or whatever). There’s still value in that type of reference, because you can speak to things like reliability, ease of working with him, conscientiousness, etc.

But the drinking thing gives me pause, given the type of job he’s applying for. “Drinks a lot at work social events” doesn’t inherently mean “irresponsible drinker who would jeopardize someone’s care.” In fact, it probably doesn’t mean that. But without knowing more details, I don’t think I can tell you whether you should or shouldn’t agree to be a reference. To figure it out, I think your best bet is to give some thought to what you know about his responsibility in general and whether you’ve ever seen him do anything like drive after drinking too much or behave inappropriately to people at these events, and maybe even consider talking to him about your concern to see how he reacts.

3. Should I contact a former coworker who’s lying about having a master’s degree?

In my previous company, I worked with a woman who claimed to hold a master’s degree. She includes this information on her resume and her LinkedIn profile, and she tells people verbally that she has a master’s degree. Through another coworker, I learned that she in fact is “one class away” from completing her master’s program. I doubt the validity of this because she was notoriously a liar (and not a very efficient worker, either, to be honest).

She moved to another state and has since been out of work (nearly two years now). Besides taking personal insult about this (I worked hard and spent a lot of money to put myself through college while working full-time in order furnish my resume with a degree, the honest way), I also think it’s hurting her chances to find work. Once an employer discovers her embellishment, the offers are rescinded and she’s branded a dishonest candidate.

On one hand, I feel I should let it slide. It’s her business if she wants to conduct herself dishonestly. But on the other hand, I’d like to send her a message to tell her the best way to find steady employment is to be honest!

My field is HR and this is sadly common, I’ve discovered. I feel like I’m the only person I know who hasn’t embellished or outright lied on their resume to get better jobs. Should I send this woman a message? I feel like the only way to change this slimy practice is one person at a time.

No, you shouldn’t. It’s really not your business — she’s a former coworker who you don’t appear to be close to and you’re not being personally impacted by her lie, so you don’t really have standing to say anything. Moreover, it doesn’t sound like you even know for sure that she’s lying (although even if you did, that wouldn’t warrant contacting her). Roll your eyes, figure that she’s going to screw herself over at some point if this is true, and move on.

4. My new coworker bites his nails constantly

I am a contractor, and my company hired a new contractor to take on some additional tasks at the site where we work. I am expected to train him and introduce him to everyone so they will know to start tasking him.

He bites his nails during meetings. All the time. I sat across from him in one meeting, and his fingers stayed in or near his mouth for at least an hour. He’s only been to a few meetings so far, but I find myself planning strategies to avoid sitting near or across from him in future meetings. I’m sure he is annoying others too.

I’ve asked him to take notes during meetings in the hopes that it would curb the nail biting, but it hasn’t helped, so I know I need to be more direct. How do I bring this up without embarrassing him while also being effective in stopping the nail biting? Should I mention this to him directly since I am training him (though we have the same job title so we’re more like peers), or would it be better for me to mention it to our boss at the contracting company?

His work has been great so far, so I want to encourage him–not alienate him. I do want to nip this in the bud though since it’s majorly annoying, and I worry that it could cause others to avoid working with him.

Oooof. I’m torn on whether this is something you have standing to ask him to stop or not, but ultimately I’m coming down on the side of yes — that you have standing not to demand he stop, but to alert him to it as a thing that’s distracting. I’d just be pretty matter-of-fact about it — “I don’t know if you realize, but you tend to bite your nails throughout meetings and it can be pretty distracting.”

I wouldn’t mention it to your boss though, not unless it continues and you think it’s going to cause issues with clients or something like that. In general, it’ll be far less awkward if you say something to him than if your boss does, since it sounds like your boss may not be regularly working with him (and thus would have to address it via secondhand information, which generally isn’t ideal).

5. Asking about nursing rooms before starting a new job

I’m starting a new job next week and I’m also currently nursing a seven-month-old. At my currently role, I can use my lactation room three times a day, which is great. How do I ask my new job about using the nursing room? Do I have to wait until I start? It’s going be physically uncomfortable to skip an entire day, but I think I could do it.

No, don’t do that to yourself! Ask ahead of time. Send an email to either your HR contact or your new manager that says, “By the way, I wanted to mention that I’m currently nursing and will need a private spot for pumping a few times during the day. Is that something I need to arrange ahead of time or is there something like that already set up?”

Just be matter-of-fact about it, since it’s something that they should be matter-of-fact about in return.

ask all your questions about the new overtime law here

Note: The new law discussed in this post was blocked the day before it was set to go into effect.

Do you have questions about what the new overtime law will mean for you? There’s a round-up of reader questions about this below, and you’re welcome to leave your own questions in the comments; I’ll try to answer as many as I can.

First, a quick recap:

  • As of December 1, if you earn less than $47,476 annually, your employer will be legally required to pay you overtime (time and a half) when you work over 40 hours in a week.
  • This is because the federal government is changing one part of the way it decides whether you’re exempt (not legally required to be paid overtime) or non-exempt (must be paid overtime). To be exempt, you must meet two tests: a salary test and a duties test. You must earn $47,476 annually (this is the change — it’s an increase from the current level of $23,600) and perform relatively high-level work (more here on what that means). The duties portion of the law isn’t changing, only the salary level.
  • If you currently earn $47,476 or more, or if you currently earn less than $47,476 and are classified as non-exempt (meaning you’ve been legally required to get overtime pay all along), this doesn’t change anything for you.
  • If you currently earn less than $47,476 and are exempt (meaning you previously haven’t received overtime pay), you’re in the group impacted by this. You will now be required to receive overtime pay (time and a half) for any hours over 40 that you work in a week. Here’s a summary of some of the ways your employer might choose to handle this.

1. When should I ask how the new overtime rules will impact my job?

When is a reasonable time to ask how the new rules for exempt employees will affect my current position (currently exempt, with salary less than $5,000 below the new $47,476 threshold)? And should I ask my manager who does little with salary, or HR?

Now is a reasonable time! They may not have an answer for you yet, but it’s not unreasonable to ask. I’d start with your manager, and if she doesn’t know, check with HR.

2. If I become exempt, do my duties need to stay the same? And can my employer lower my rate of pay?

I am currently an exempt manager making the minimum $455 per week to be exempt under the current overtime law. Once the new law goes into effect, if my employer decides to put me on hourly to avoid paying the increase in salary requirement, can they make me perform the same management duties I currently am doing — but as a non-exempt hourly employee? And can they pay me less per hour if they put me on hourly?

Yes and yes. They can indeed have you doing the same duties, and they can lower your hourly rate. (They can’t do that retroactively, but they can do it going forward.) Some employers in this situation may choose to lower people’s hourly rates, on the assumption that they’ll be paying overtime that they didn’t used to pay (and so they’re trying to get it to work out to about the same overall annual pay).

3. Negotiating a raise to stay exempt

My wife is a salaried exempt employee with a $39,000 salary, well short of the new December 1 salary level; she’s the only person at her firm in this situation. The BLS mean wage for her particular job in our metro area is $59,000, and she’s making slightly below the 25th percentile. She averages 48-50 hours per week. Doing the math, the difference is less than if the company paid her six hours overtime per week. It’s a small firm (under 15 employees) and cutting her workload would make them miss deadlines on some lucrative contracts. Should she try to proactively negotiate a 20% raise to keep her exempt, or just wait and see what management tells her and react from there? If you were the boss of this situation, what would you be likely to do? Do the new overtime rules give people in the “gap” extra leverage to negotiate raises?

This company recently hired, then had to fire (for misconduct) a few months later, another person in her department who was carrying the same duties as she had, and after he was let go, word got out that he had been hired on at $55,000. My wife didn’t know that salary negotiation was “was even a thing you could do” when hired, and took their first offer, but it doesn’t seem likely that they could replace her production for less than the new exempt minimum. Does this change the outlook on whether or not she might get the raise?

Yep, she could proactively propose that they raise her to the new exempt level, pointing out that it would be the equivalent of keeping her non-exempt and paying her for six hours of overtime a week, and pointing out that she normally works more than that amount of overtime in an average week.

That’s likely a financially sound plan for them, although it’s possible that they’re considering other options instead (including keeping her non-exempt but lowering her base hourly wage so that even with the overtime pay, her overall annual wages come out about the same).

The fact that they hired someone into the same role for $55,000 is highly relevant, in that it tells her that they’re willing to pay that rate for the work she does and that they may assume they’d need to pay if they had to replace her. So that’s a very good sign.

Read an update to this question here.

4. Getting a higher salary when the overtime rules are giving everyone gets a raise

I recently accepted a job offer (thanks to your wonderful interview guide and the information I found on this site!) for a job that is currently exempt and requires some periods of travel and overtime. It pays less than $47,476, though, so when new overtime laws go into effect on December 1st there will be changes to my pay. I’ll either be switched to hourly or given a flat raise, but either way my new manager says it’s likely I’ll be making more than I am now.

My question is how to (tactfully) ask for a raise beyond the minimum amount that all people in my position will be given. When I was offered the position, I was specifically told that the hiring manager had to get special approval to max out the salary range for the position but felt I was worth it due to my unique experience and excellent interview (thanks again!). If we’re all given a flat raise, is it appropriate to ask for a raise beyond the minimum $47,476 and how would I go about doing so?

I wouldn’t at this point. Presuming that they’re currently paying you a rate that you felt was fair for you work, it’s not really a strong argument to say “well, you’ve raised me over the rate I earlier agreed was fair, but I want more solely because I want to be making more than other people.” It’s also not likely to go over well at a time when your employer is probably facing significant new salary expenses for a number of people.

But you can possibly address this at your next salary review after this one (or bring it up yourself in a year, whichever comes first). At that point, if you’re significantly exceeding expectations for your role, you could potentially argue that the base rate for the position is $47,476, and your excellent performance warrants a higher level of pay than the base rate. I’m couching this with “possibly” and “potentially” because it partly depends on what your salary is now. If increasing you to the new exempt level isn’t a massive increase, this strategy would make sense. But if you’re earning, like $30,000 now, this argue will be less compelling.

Feel free to leave your own questions about the new overtime law in the comments.

the first state has made it illegal to ask about salary history

Job seekers in Massachusetts will no longer have to disclose their salary history to prospective employers in order to be considered for a job, thanks to a new pay equity law signed this week. The law, which goes into effect in July 2018, makes it illegal for employers to ask job applicants what they’ve earned in the past and makes Massachusetts the first state to ban the practice.

This step is a victory for job seekers, who have long been put at a disadvantage by employers who insist on knowing their past salary history. Employers commonly base salary offers on the information, which has meant that people who have been earning below-market wages are more likely to continue to be underpaid – which has historically been a particular issue for women, who are statistically likely to be paid less than their male counterparts for the same work.

“The prohibition is designed to stop perpetuating pay inequality from employer to employer when employers offer to pay women applicants less than their male counterparts because the men were paid more at the last employer,” says Amanda Marie Baer, an employment lawyer at Mirick, O’Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP in Massachusetts. “For example, if a company is hiring two accountants, Pam and Paul, and knows their respective salary histories, it may be inclined to offer Pam $80,000 because she was paid $60,000 by her last employer, while offering Paul $90,000 because he was paid $70,000 by his last employer – resulting in a $10,000 pay gap. If the company does not know Pam and Paul’s salary histories, it may offer an equal salary of $85,000 to both.”

Companies that do this often assert that salary offers pegged to a candidate’s previous pay are generous increases, even when the offer ends up causing this kind of gender gap or results in below-market pay.

Of course, employers who ask about salary history often claim that knowing how much a candidate earned in the past helps them understand how other companies have valued that person’s work. But employers should be able to determine a new hire’s value themselves, based on the person’s experience, accomplishments, skills and track record, as well as the responsibilities they’ll be assuming in the new role. Plenty of companies don’t request salary history and still manage to figure out what a job or a new hire is worth to them. In fact, a company that doesn’t know what a position is worth is a company that hasn’t done sufficient planning and analysis before advertising a job opening.

But while this new law is great for job seekers in Massachusetts, what can you do if you live in any of the other 49 states and thus are still subject to intrusive questions about past earnings from employers?

The best thing that you can do when employers ask for your salary history to answer the question they should have asked – which is about what salary range you’re seeking now. So for example, you might say, “I’m looking for $60,000 to $70,000.” In many cases (more than you might expect!) the person you’re talking to will accept this answer and move on with the conversation. But if the interviewer insists on learning what you’ve made previously, you can try being more direct about the fact that you don’t care to share that private information. You can try saying, “My previous employers have considered their salary structure confidential, but I’m looking for a range of X to Y” or “I’ve always kept that confidential, but I’m seeking a range of X to Y.” Some interviewers will accept that, and others won’t. If they don’t, at that point you’ll need to decide if you’re willing to hold firm and risk shutting down the process or not.

And if you do get pressured into disclosing your salary history and you worry that it will be used to lowball you at the offer stage, keep in mind that you can contextualize the salary information for your interviewer. For example, you might note that your most current salary is under-market and is the primary reason that you’re looking at other organizations and that you wouldn’t consider changing jobs for less than a certain salary amount.

And meanwhile, keep an eye on Massachusetts’ law. It may be the first in a trend that could spread to your state.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

dealing with catcalls while I’m walking with coworkers

A reader writes:

I’m a 20-year-old summer intern at a company that I absolutely love, and one of the reasons I like it so much is the casual environment and culture. There’s an office candy stash, complimentary yoga classes, and no dress code (my offer letter literally says that I could come to work in a sparkly cowboy suit if I really wanted to).

Usually, I wear sundresses (like many women in the office). Now, I don’t think this should be relevant, but I know some people might wonder — my dresses are nothing that would cause me to get a detention at the Catholic school I went to. That is, my skirt is always longer than my fingertips resting at my side, and the straps are always more than two inches thick. Despite the fact that this is my first office job, I can say with confidence that for the work environment I’m in, my attire is appropriate and professional. I look like everyone else, but a little younger.

Being able to dress for warm weather is especially useful in the summertime, because our office is actually split across two buildings that are a couple blocks apart, and the nature of my work means that at least once a day, I walk with coworkers from one building to the next. These blocks that we’re walking down are somewhat busy city blocks right next to a park, and I’ve had the same embarrassing thing happen to me a few times while walking: I’ve been catcalled by some passing jerk.

They’re nothing out of the ordinary for catcalls: “Hey there, pretty baby” and “Ooh, sexy!” and, most embarrassingly, “Hey red dress, what does that mouth do?” Euugh. When I’m alone or with a friend when I get catcalled, I just ignore it (or, admittedly, show the guy in question a particular finger). But I have no idea what to do when I’m with coworkers! It makes everything feel so awkward all of a sudden — conversations stop, eye contact is avoided — and I want to be able to defuse the tension. Staying silent feels like I’m not condemning it enough. Responding to the catcall feels too aggressive. Saying I’m embarrassed feels like an apology, when I haven’t done anything wrong. I once said something like “Ugh! Cat-callers are the worst!” but that didn’t really make the situation any less uncomfortable.

What can/should I do? Pretend it isn’t happening? Stop walking with my coworkers? Bite the bullet and cover up more at work (even though, I might add, this has even happened on days when I wear jeans and a t-shirt)? I’m an intern still getting used to the professional world, so I appreciate any advice you can give me.

Ugh, I’m sorry you’re dealing with this, and that it’s making you feel like the burden is on you to smooth things over for the people you’re with.

Ideally, your coworkers would be jumping in to support you, or at least ensuring there’s no weird silence. “Gross,” “what an asshole,” “that’s not okay,” or “ick, sorry that happened” would all be acceptable things for them to say. I’m not going to blame them too much, because it’s pretty normal for people not to have the perfect on-the-spot reaction in the face of this kind of thing, but I’m pointing it out so that you know that the responsibility doesn’t lie with you to make everyone else feel comfortable. If anyone is taking that on, it should be them for you.

As for what you should do in the moment: whatever’s going to make you the most comfortable. “Gross,” “what an asshole,” and “ick” are all perfectly appropriate things for you to say too. Or you can just continue on with whatever conversation you were having. Or you can say nothing, if that’s what you end up with! Saying nothing is not in any way an insufficient response. You don’t have any obligation here at all, and saying nothing is perfectly fine. Of everyone involved in this situation, you are the person with the least obligation to defuse the tension caused by someone harassing you.

For what it’s worth, your coworkers almost certainly know that this a crappy thing that happens to women, they’re not thinking you’re in any way responsible for it, and many of them probably deal with it themselves. They definitely don’t expect you to smooth it over; they’re almost certainly feeling awful that you’re having to deal with it and probably are questioning themselves later about whether they could have handled it better in the moment themselves.

And no, don’t conclude you need to dress differently or stop walking with your coworkers. You’re dressing appropriately for your office, and you don’t need to change your clothing, your perfectly normal habits, or your work relationships because of assholes.

can I get out of a personality assessment at work, my coworker constantly fact-checks everything, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker constantly fact-checks everyone else

I have a coworker who has a habit of fact-checking other team members. She is not a manager. If a team member mentions information in a meeting, casually discusses a topic in the hallway, or sends an email to the team, this coworker will fact-check the information and reply-all and/or discuss her findings with the group. The fact-checking can range anywhere from verifying incoming rainstorms to confirming/denying the accuracy of information in an article that a team member shares with the group.

If she finds out information is correct, she will share that she checked/confirmed. Typically incorrect information is pointed out a few times a week. Incorrect can mean that a rainstorm will arrive at a different hour, or that she disagrees with the premise of an article, etc.

The behavior raises eyebrows and makes others uncomfortable. Any suggestions for how to approach the issue, or if it’s best to ignore?

She’s fact-checking trivial information from a casual hallway discussion and emailing her findings to your whole group? Oh dear.

If you were her manager, I’d tell you to ask her to cut it out, but as a coworker, I’d just it go and know that everyone else finds this really weird too. I’ve got to think that this kind of know-it-all-ism is a real impediment in her relationships with people.

But if it’s really annoying you, you could say, “Hey, I’m sure you don’t mean it this way, but doing all this fact-checking of other people is coming across kind of oddly — like you don’t trust people and want to correct them, even on inconsequential details.” Or in the moment when she does it, you could just say, “I don’t think we needed that fact-checked” (especially when she’s confirming the info is correct) or “I’m finding the follow-up on such minor stuff kind of distracting — could we save it for things where the substance matters more?”

2. Can I get out of a personality assessment at work?

My employer is rolling out one of those personality/behavior assessments. There was no discussion of whether or not we (the rest of the staff) wanted to do this, or how required it is or how to opt out — it was simply presented as “staff are going to do this.” I’m strongly opposed to any sort of personality assessment because I find them not useful and a massive violation of privacy, crossing the line between professional and personal. Do I have any standing to ask if I can opt out? If so, how would I go about doing this professionally? Note that if they say it’s required or else I’ll get fired, then I’ll suck it up and do it, but I feel like not even asking would be a betrayal to my personality (ironically).

Also, my manager is on leave right now so I wouldn’t be able to discuss this with her. The assessments are being overseen by HR.

You can try to opt out if you want, and it’s useful for employers to hear that not everyone is happy to be asked to do these. That said, there may be a cost to trying to get out of it — in terms of how much political capital you’ll use that then won’t be there if you want to ask for an exception for something else in the future — so you’ll need to factor that into whether you feel strongly enough about it or not.

If you do decide to try to get out of it, I’d say this: “I’d like to excuse myself from participating in this; there are loads of issues with these assessments’ scientific validity, and they’re more personal than I’m comfortable getting at work. So I want to give you a heads-up that I plan to sit this out.”

3. When someone thinks I didn’t answer their email, but I did

I’ve had the same email issue pop up frequently in the past few months: I’ll receive an emailed question from a colleague or customer. I respond immediately with all necessary information. About a week later, I receive a forwarded copy of their initial question with something like “What’s the status here????” on top. Clearly, they did not see or lost my response.

In the most recent incident, my boss and several others were copied the second time around. I responded by forwarding my original date and timed-stamped response with “please let me know if there were additional questions beyond these” and keeping my boss copied.

But I worry about making the questioning person look stupid, especially if they are a higher-up. And it’s a customer, I don’t want them to feel adversarial, even if they are wrong. Thoughts on how to handle this?

Before you forward the original email, I’d first reply to their follow-up and say something like this: “I actually sent you an answer to this on Tuesday of last week, but maybe it got lost somewhere along the way! I’ll forward it to you right now.” That way, you’re helping them save face a bit and you’re allowing for the possibility that it really didn’t make it to them for some reason — and you’re just making it an overall more pleasant interaction.

4. My employees keep socializing with the person who managed them before me

I manage 10 people in my department. Before me, there was a manager who left to work for another company. He left all of our projects somewhat of a mess and did not supervise the group at all. Now I am stuck fixing everything. My employees, however, have met with him socially several times, and are now inviting him to their work anniversary get-together. They also allowed him into the office to look at one of their computers, even though he no longer works there. I know I can’t tell them not to socialize with him on a personal level, even though they’ve all known each other less than a year and I don’t understand why they would want to anyway. I am incredibly bothered by their continued association with him. Should I let it go?

Yep, you definitely shouldn’t try to control who they talk to outside of work. It’ll make you look petty and controlling, and it’s likely to really poison how you’re seen. You shouldn’t refuse to let them invite him to this work event either, if you’d normally allow another non-employee to attend. However, it’s perfectly reasonable not to allow former employees access to your company’s computers (!) and you should put a stop to that and make it known that that’s a security issue.

5. Can I ask current employees what to expect from a company’s interview process?

I studied computer programming during my time at my university. Although I prepared a lot, I was recently kind of blindsided with one of the pre-interview questions I was asked by a small local company in my region. I got the math problems fine, and the code for the programming question worked as well, but apparently they were looking for something else in the little program I wrote, and I was rejected. I don’t want this to happen again.

I might have two interviews coming up, I’m not sure. But would it be proper to, after an interview is scheduled, look up employees at the prospective companies I’m interviewing for and ask them questions about what their interview experience was like and what to expect? I’m not sure if it’s good etiquette or if they’d find it flattering.

Nope! There’s too much of a chance that it’ll come across as trying to get an advantage in their interview process that they don’t intend for candidates to get. They want to know how you do without insider info helping you. And actually, that’s in your best interest too — you want to be screened out of jobs that you aren’t a strong fit for, since you don’t want to end up in a job that isn’t the right match for you.

weekend free-for-all – August 6-7, 2016

Eve's faceThis comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly no work and no school. If you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book recommendation of the week: The Girls, by Emma Cline. I ended up equally haunted by the almost painfully beautiful writing and the story itself, which is about a teenage girl who drifts into what’s clearly a reimagining of the Manson cult.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.