my coworker tells others I’m going to be overwhelmed by Alison Green on July 15, 2021 A reader writes: First, some background: I (f) am an engineer in shared services in new product development. This means that I do not report through R&D, but I do support their teams on a dedicated basis. I am considered a team member for the duration of a project, which can last several years, and the R&D engineers and project leads provide significant input to my manager regarding my performance and effort to meet project goals. I have been with my current team for four years and am at the higher end of experience level on the team, with 20+ years in the industry. I have had a few instances where I feel that the lead engineer (Marty) has undermined my professionalism and dedication to the project. When things get very busy, he will tell the project lead (Helen) that I am going to be overwhelmed, and that they need to request more resources to support me. This happens in regularly scheduled meetings that I don’t attend, and then is usually brought up again in a large team meeting that includes me, the other shared engineers, and our manager. I think this makes it look like I do not have the foresight to know if I am going to be overwhelmed, or that I don’t care if I end up being a bottleneck. These things are just not true though. I am a high performer and I can be counted on to meet deadlines. I work quietly in the background with my other shared services teammates to spread out workload if needed, but usually, I will just get it done – a few evening or weekend hours every couple of months is completely within our team norms. The last time Marty did this, I specifically asked him if he thought I was holding up the project or causing unnecessary delays, and he said no, but he was worried that it would get to that point, and he just wants to make sure I am supported. (He is kind of a worrier in general.) Am I wrong for feeling that this is detrimental to my reputation, and that there is possibly a bit of sexism there too? How do I address this without coming across as overly defensive or harsh? I wrote back and asked, “Have you ever noticed him doing this with anyone else, or is it only to you? (Or would you not necessarily know?)” Funny that you ask … just yesterday afternoon, he did this to another woman (Wendy) from my team. He reassigned a couple of tasks to other team members, and then worked out a plan to free up some of Wendy’s time to focus on the remaining high priority tasks, without ever talking to her! When he emailed her with the proposal, Wendy pushed back and said that she would get the work done in a timely manner, without needing to rearrange her other commitments. There is also a man on the team (Frank) with some outstanding tasks, and Marty asked him by email if he would like to have the work reassigned or if he could get to it. Try this: “Hey Marty, I’m sure you don’t mean to do this, but when you express concern that I’ll be overwhelmed or need assistance with a project, it undermines me and makes me look like I can’t manage my own workload. I know you don’t want to hurt my reputation, so going forward can you assume I’m looking at the impact of my projects on my workload and I will speak up if I have concerns or need assistance?” That’s not defensive or harsh; it’s matter-of-fact, direct, and reasonable. There’s a good chance Marty genuinely thinks he’s being helpful, and so you need to tell him clearly that he’s not and that you want him to stop. I don’t know if he actually has harmed your reputation by doing this (it sounds possible that he’s like this with everyone and people know that — I’d be a lot more worried if he were just doing it with you), but you’re right to worry about it and it’s very, very reasonable to tell him that his “help” is in fact harmful and you need him to stop. I also don’t know if it’s rooted in sexism. It sounds like he’s doing it to at least one man too, but that’s not conclusive since for all I know he’s doing it far more with women or that the one man you mentioned really was struggling. It could be that Marty is just a worrier/over-stepper or it could be that he’s a sexist worrier/over-stepper. But you’d use the same approach either way. One caveat: All of this assumes that Marty isn’t your boss and doesn’t have authority over these projects or you. If that’s not the case, then what he’s doing is still annoying and problematic, but he’d have a lot more standing to be doing it! In that case, you could still ask him to stop but you should soften the language to something more like, “You often express concern that I’ll be overwhelmed or need assistance with a project. I appreciate that you want to support me and are thinking about my workload, but I’m concerned that it’s undermining me to others by making it look like I won’t manage my projects well without your intervention. Unless you have concerns about my performance, can we agree that I’ll speak up if I’m worried about my ability to complete a project on time or need help, and you’ll assume I’ve got it covered if I don’t? Or if you’re worried, would you talk with me one-on-one instead of sharing those worries in meetings with others?” You may also like:how can I make sure my team meets deadlines?I'm being told to let my coworker fail on a $35 million projectnew coworker is a rude know-it-all { 83 comments }
I was rejected after a manager looked at my LinkedIn profile by Alison Green on July 15, 2021 A reader writes: I recently applied for a job at an organization that I am really interested in working for. On Monday, I noticed that a senior manager in the department had looked at my LinkedIn profile on Sunday. However, I received an automated rejection letter that morning. My profile is pretty similar to my resume and I am unsure if I am over-analyzing it or if there’s something I need to fix on my profile and or resume for future applications! I answer this question — and four others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here. Other questions I’m answering there today include: Should I have disclosed that my networking connection is actually my spouse? Employees aren’t covering their tabs I’m still getting calls from clients after being let go Changed my name, now changing it back You may also like:here’s the right way to submit your resume onlineold coworkers who won the lottery want to come back to work, a credible company has a fake-seeming website, and moreI google my coworkers -- is that weird? { 82 comments }
my coworker’s bad customer service is irritating me … and she’s friends with my mom by Alison Green on July 15, 2021 It’s the Thursday “ask the readers” question. A reader writes: I work in a very small public library. One of my coworkers is an older woman who has been friends with my mom for decades, and she and I are also on friendly terms. I’ve helped her out before — I did some grocery runs for her early in the pandemic, I’ve given her rides to and from the train station, etc. Sometimes she gets into topics I’m not really prepared to talk about while I’m working (like what my brothers and I are planning for my mom’s 70th birthday in five months, or a time where she mentioned she’d noticed I took an inefficient route to the grocery store after work and wanted to advise me on how to shave 30 seconds off my trip.) I find her a little stressful socially, but at work we really do pretty well. Or we did until a long-term staff member moved away and this friend started filling in on the Saturday shifts. Now it’s her and me manning the front desks and the phones, as well as handling computer questions, checking out books for browsers, and prepping curbside/hallway pickups. To be honest, she’s not great at customer service, and it really, really annoys me. Some of it is just classic body language and “How can I help” vs “What do you want” tone issues. She always seems annoyed that a patron asked a question she can’t answer. It feels like she treats every patron interaction and minor computer trouble like a high-stakes issue, and she clearly comes across as frustrated, stressed out, and irritated. She’s also very quick to pass patron questions along to me if she can’t answer them and defers to me so often when it’s just the two of us that patrons have assumed that I’m her manager and complained about her attitude! If I were her manager, maybe it would be easier to address these problems. But with her age, her friendship with my mom, her seniority (in terms of years worked here) over me, and my knowledge that there’s personal stuff going on in her life, it’s difficult for me to bring up suggestions or advice. It’s much easier for me to just do something right the first time than get called in every time she feels like she’s making a mistake, but I know that she picks up on my annoyance because she asks me stuff like “Do my questions make you crazy?” Thing is, it’s not the questions themselves that get on my nerves, it’s how she asks them (and how she treats patrons). Is there a polite way to offer her advice on this sort of nebulous interpersonal thing that she’s never asked for help with? Readers, what’s your advice? You may also like:my employees are afraid they'll be ostracized after they're promotedI have an inappropriate coworker and our mothers are friendswhat should I expect from my staff at this point in the pandemic? { 154 comments }
thermostat wars with a classist twist, boss won’t return clients’ calls, and more by Alison Green on July 15, 2021 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. Thermostat wars with a classist twist My office is in the basement of a building owned by my company. The main offices are on the floor above me, and the floors above that are rented out as vacation/short-term rentals. Although I have a private office, there’s a bathroom, kitchenette, and shared workspace in the basement, as well as the laundry/storage for the vacation rentals. The shared workspace is open to all employees, but is generally used by salespeople/those who work outside of the office. Nobody is assigned to it; it’s just for people who stop by and need it. Officially, the thermostat is controlled by the cleaning lady and me, but recently we’ve been having issues with those using the shared workspace. I generally let the cleaning lady control the temperature. She likes it much cooler than most people, but unlike us, she’s doing physical labor such as folding heavy bedding, carrying laundry baskets/supplies up and down multiple flights of stairs, etc. I sit at a desk; when I get chilly, I put on a light sweater. Recently, people using the shared workspace have been raising the temperature and complaining about “the cold.” When I explained the situation, a few pushed back, claiming that they “outrank” the cleaning lady. But we don’t really have that kind of structure. The people using the shared workspace are technically contract labor, while the cleaning lady is technically a paid employee, but I suspect they’re actually referring to the fact that they have “white collar” jobs. I fear race might play an issue, too, but nothing has ever been said outright. For what it’s worth, I’m a full-time, exempt employee who probably “outranks” the contract people if it came to it. If I claim that I’m the one who wants it cooler, people back right off, but that seems hypocritical and weird coming from someone wearing a light sweater. We don’t have HR and nobody really cares about the basement but the occupants. Is this an acceptable hill to die on? Can I push back for the cleaning lady’s sake? She doesn’t speak great English, but she’s made it pretty clear that she likes it cooler, and again, she does a lot of physical labor. Also, for what it’s worth, she keeps it at the low end of the “room temperature” range (like 68 degrees F), but others prefer it closer to 73. How can I handle this? Yes, push back. The “outranking” thing just seems to mean “she’s doing manual labor and we’re not” and “we feel better or more important than the cleaner.” But even if that weren’t the case, temperature isn’t something that should be decided by rank anyway. Rank matters when it comes to things like decisions about work projects, not who is going to be uncomfortably hot. And it makes far more sense to defer to the people who are in the space every day (you and the cleaner) rather than people who are in and out. (I’d also argue you should give extra consideration to people who can’t take off any more clothes to get cooler versus those who could at least try adding another layer to be warmer, but that’s not a universal viewpoint.) That said, is there a compromise in there? OSHA recommends temperatures of 68-76° F and this is at the very low end of that. Could you try 69 or 70 and see how that works? It’s still closer to your cleaner’s preferred end of the spectrum without raising the temperature the full five degrees your colleagues want. 2. Clients are angry that my boss won’t return calls The owner of the company I work for often doesn’t return phone calls or texts from our clients. Then I end up talking to them and they are angry. They’ll tell me, “I’ve left three messages” or the voicemail is full or “They at least owe me the courtesy of a return call”. The owner knows full well this is happening. It’s rare that a day goes by that this doesn’t happen at least once. I can’t handle these callers’ needs for them. They want or need to talk to the owner. I’m sick of making up excuses. What do I say to these people? Right now it’s a variation on, “I’m sorry. Yes, they got the message. No, I don’t know when they will be in. I apologize.” Pretty soon I’m going to change it to, “You might as well forget it. They aren’t going to return your call in this lifetime.” Help! This is really your boss’s decision to make. Talk to your boss, explain that people get increasingly angry, and ask what they’d like you to say in that situation. You can also include info about people’s irritation when you pass along messages (“she noted it’s her third call and sounds angry”). But beyond that, it’s really your boss’s call. It’s a terrible way to run a business, but if they want you to just keep politely saying that you’ll relay the message … that’s the job and you have to decide if it’s a job you’re willing to do or not. 3. Employee is criticizing our sponsors on social media I oversee a public-facing department at a nonprofit service organization. One of our long-time program managers is an oversharer. This includes on social media, where she has in the recent past criticized two of our sponsors in loooonnnggg Facebook posts, which included phrases like “Corporation X needs to get their s**t together.” These were criticisms based on her personal experiences, not related to work (think complaining about the customer service at Corp X when she was shopping there). Yesterday, she followed up with more complaining during a program meeting that included clients and volunteers. I am not connected to her on any social media but her posts were shared with me by a coworker. I know she is connected to many of our volunteers and clients, as well as colleagues, on social media. She has also talks about promoting the program she manages on her personal accounts, so it’s clear to anyone following her that she is an employee. Our organization does not have any policies about social media use. Can I tell her to stop with the negative posts about sponsors and then hold her accountable, given her public-facing role? Should I instead ask HR about creating a policy about social media use that would ensure everyone in the company is getting the same message/equal treatment? It’s a good idea to have a policy that makes clear to people what is and isn’t okay, but you don’t need a policy in place to talk to her — and you should indeed talk to her: “You’re in a public-facing role so you cannot criticize our sponsors on social media or in meetings that include clients, volunteers, or anyone else external. You could jeopardize our sponsorships or our reputation. This is a basic condition of your role.” Also, it’s worth taking a closer look at her judgment in general. If she’s saying negative things about your sponsors from an account where it’s clear she’s an employee of your organization, this is probably not the only incident of bad judgment. 4. I was laid off and now they’re rehiring, but my old boss hasn’t contacted me In summer of 2020, I was part of a Covid layoff at a small company (around 80 employees). When I was let go, I was given a severance package, in addition to the company paying for me to work with a job placement service for a couple months. The company made clear this was not a performance-based layoff and that I did great work (I had all good reviews while I worked there, etc.) but they had lost clients due to Covid and had to let a group of people go. My boss was terribly apologetic and offered multiple times to be a reference for me in my job hunt. A year later, I’m still on the hunt and I look on my old company’s website and see that my old job has been re-posted a few weeks ago. I’m hurt and disappointed, and I’m also wondering if I need to stop using my boss from this company as a reference? I’m confused that he would tell me multiple times that he would be a reference for me and then not be interested in hiring me back. It seems to send mixed signals. I last texted with my old boss re: him being a reference a few weeks ago, so he knows that I’m still looking, What are your thoughts? There are possible explanations for this that aren’t “your old boss thinks you suck!” The needs of the job could have changed in the last year in a way that means you’re no longer as strong a fit for it as you once were. Or they might only be able to hire back a few of the people who were let go and have already slated these positions for them. Or your old boss might not be actively focused on hiring yet, even though the ad is up (for instance, maybe HR posted it and he’s not going to even think about it until it’s time for him to look at applications). Or, yes, it’s possible that he’s not enthused about hiring you back for some reason. You could contact him and feel him out! Email him and say something like, “I saw the X job was posted and I’d love to come back to that role. Since we hadn’t connected about it, though, I wondered if you were thinking of going in another direction for it or if it would make sense for me to apply.” Either way, I wouldn’t conclude you need to stop using him as a reference unless you’ve seen signs he’s not giving you a strong recommendation (which he could do even if he doesn’t think you’re the best hire he could make for this particular job now). If you’re unsure, though, it’s always okay to ask a reference, “I just want to make sure, do you still feel like you can be a strong reference for me or would it be better for me to offer others?” 5. Did I miss out on this job because the other candidate had a strong recommendation? I recently interviewed with an amazing company and did amazing in my interviews. I could tell how much everyone really enjoyed me as well as my expertise. Everything moved very quickly and then suddenly I didn’t hear back for two weeks. When I did hear back, the recruiter went on and on about how great I did, how much everyone loved me, and how the reason it took so long to get back to me was because they looked to see if the budget allowed for both me and the other final candidate to be hired. Unfortunately there wasn’t the need/budget for both of us, so ultimately they went with the other hire. The recruiter said that the other person came highly recommended and with a personal referral. My question is how much are referrals weighed? Clearly I did a great job and impressed everyone I interviewed with (I was told to check in periodically because they want me to work for them at some point), but not enough that I got the job. Or maybe I did better than the other person but because they had a referral from someone important (I don’t know if that’s the case, that’s just my assumption) the company had to go with that person? I’m obviously disappointed, but I know these things happen. I was just curious about your take. How much weight a referral gets depends on the referral, and also on the candidate pool. If the recommendation is glowing and from someone the hiring manager trusts who knows the job, knows what kind of person would thrive in it, and has good judgment, that would count for a lot — definitely more than a referral from a VIP who doesn’t know the job that well (at least in healthy organizations). In a case where you had two really good candidates, that kind of strong recommendation from a trusted source could definitely push that person over the top. But in a case where I had two really good candidates, a referral from someone who I didn’t know well or didn’t know the job well would be something I’d consider as part of the whole picture but wouldn’t be the deciding factor. Ultimately, I wouldn’t think too much about the role the referral played here. There could be a ton of other factors that ultimately made the employer choose the other person; the recruiter might have mentioned the referral just because it was an easy, quick thing to cite, not because it was super weighty. Sometimes there are just two great people and only one job to fill, and deciding between them is much more art than science. You may also like:someone is taking phone calls while using the toilet in our shared bathroomhere's a real-life email from an employer that's managing its re-opening wellsomeone spends an hour a day putting on makeup in our shared bathroom { 466 comments }
did the pandemic really show we can be just as effective working from home? by Alison Green on July 14, 2021 In the past few months, I’ve been hearing a lot of people say something that goes like this: “The pandemic completely smashed the idea that we couldn’t be just as effective working from home.” Usually the implication is that therefore employers who want to bring employees back to the office must be controlling or out of touch. In some cases that’s true. But in a lot of others … it’s not. Things to consider: • You might have been just as effective working from home, or even more so. But other people might have found it harder to reach you, have ad hoc conversations with you, understand all your communications/reports, etc. You might think, “Well, I don’t want you reaching me on the fly; not getting interrupted all the time is part of what has made me more effective.” But it’s not necessarily a net positive for your team as a whole. (Maybe it is! But maybe it’s not.) • “Things have gone really well this past year” sometimes means “we adjusted priorities and expectations when the pandemic started and things have gone really well for that context.” Lots of teams had to push back or eliminate projects and make compromises on quality or metrics when their offices went remote overnight … but at some point expectations will return to normal levels and some of those may require being on-site even if the past year’s adjusted expectations did not. • In some cases, you working from home might mean someone else has to pick up more stuff in the office. Even if that work seems relatively small (mailing something out, opening and scanning your mail, or so forth), doing that for multiple people adds up. • New hires might be struggling to form relationships, learn the culture, and pick up on how you do things. • Junior staff might be missing out on a ton of mentoring. There is a lot of learning by osmosis that goes on when you’re junior (and later too, for that matter) — things like learning how to handle a difficult client or interview a source by overhearing your coworkers doing their own jobs. That loss is not a negligible one. In some cases it might be outweighed by other gains, but we shouldn’t pretend it doesn’t exist. None of this is to argue against remote work. I love remote work! But the conversation about it needs to be more nuanced than it sometimes has been. You may also like:can I apply for a temporarily remote job and then insist on remaining remote?people who have been at work all along are exhausteddo I need to keep covering a remote employee's work? { 619 comments }
how exactly do you quit a job? by Alison Green on July 14, 2021 Quitting your job can be surprisingly anxiety-producing, even for people who are thrilled to be leaving. And if you haven’t quit many jobs before, you might not even be sure exactly how to do it. Do you have to do it in-person? By formal letter? Do you need to say why you’re quitting or can you just … be done? What if your boss is impossible to reach and the clock is ticking on the notice period you want? At Vice today, I run through everything you need to know about how to quit your job professionally and without burning bridges. You can read it here. You may also like:when is it OK to quit a new job I hate?what you need to do before you quit your jobquestions about resigning -- while your boss is on maternity leave, when your boss is hard to find, and when… { 96 comments }
my boss will not physically acknowledge me in social settings by Alison Green on July 14, 2021 A reader writes: I’ve noticed something odd about how my boss talks to me. He doesn’t physically acknowledge me in social settings — if I’m standing in a group with him and others, he doesn’t look at me at all, but he does look at everyone else. I can’t remember the last time he looked at me in casual conversation, though we’ve been in that setting many times. If I say or ask something, he’ll acknowledge or answer it, and will even address me directly, but he never looks at me or even turns to face me. I’ve looked, and I’ve not seen him do this with anyone else — just me. This even happens when there’s just one other person — he’ll face them and not me, even while directly addressing me. A non-English speaker would easily think he wasn’t talking to me. I once told a friend I’d buy them a drink if my boss looked at me during a conversation. It lasted 10 minutes, and he engaged everyone else, but I didn’t have to buy a drink. On another occasion, I pulled faces at him to see if he’d notice. He didn’t, even though he verbally addressed me many times — while looking at someone else. When we talk over email or over the phone, there’s nothing unusual, and he will look at me when we talk about something work-related. It’s just face-to-face social settings where he doesn’t look at me. During Covid, we’ve been completely remote, but we’re just starting to reopen, and so I’ve started to notice it again. I’ve observed it pretty often now and I really don’t think I’m mistaken. I otherwise have a good relationship with him. I like my work, and he clearly respects me professionally, trusts me with projects, and gives me opportunities. I also get along with him personally — he’s invited my husband and me over to dinner on occasions (my husband works in the same place), and shared personal details with me that he doesn’t talk about with many others — things like that. This isn’t directly related, but worth mentioning as it may be relevant: a while ago, I made a pretty major mistake. When he caught wind of it, his response was to ring my husband up and have him talk to me (my husband’s role has no crossover with mine). He never spoke to me about it directly at all. I apologized for the mistake, but told him I needed him to talk to me directly and not use my husband as proxy. He did sort of back down, though I don’t think he really understood. And I never got a full apology, though my husband did. What I really want to ask is, why might he be doing this? And also, should I (or even, can I) call him out on it? Calling him out in the moment seems difficult — there are necessarily other people around when he does it, so unless there’s a super subtle way of doing it, I don’t see how I can, but is it really worth having a separate conversation with him? Or should I just let it go? A couple of years ago, I would probably have said “I don’t mind, I’m just puzzled by it.” But now, I’m starting to mind. I wrote back with a barrage of questions: “Has this always happened, or did it only start at some point? If so, is there anything significant about the timing of when it started? Like was it right after that incident where he called your husband, or anything else that might be notable? And when he invites you to his house for dinner, does he look at you then?” I’ve known him almost six years, and as far as I can tell, it’s always happened, though I’ve become more aware of it probably in the past three years. At least I can’t recall it suddenly starting. He doesn’t look at me at his house either, though it’s less noticeable. Sometimes it’s just my husband and me, sometimes there’s one or two others (he has people over reasonably often). When it’s just my husband and me over, I do get the impression he’d rather be talking just to my husband, but maybe felt he had to invite me over too — to the extent that if we’re asked again, I would probably find an excuse not to go and let my husband go on his own. Well, this is awfully weird. Normally if someone is making such a point of not looking at you, I’d assume they were uncomfortable around you for some reason — but he’s talking to you normally and it doesn’t happen at all in work conversations! (Also, that last part makes it extra weird! The fact that he looks at you normally when you’re talking about work things but then acts as if your face is radioactive when the conversation is social — while still continuing to speak as if nothing’s wrong — is an additional layer of oddness.) And he’s inviting you to dinner at his house. HE’S INVITING YOU TO DINNER AT HIS HOUSE EVEN THOUGH HE CANNOT LOOK DIRECTLY AT YOU. Every detail makes this stranger and stranger. Also, the fact that he called your husband about you (!!) feels somehow connected to all this but I don’t know how. I have no idea what’s going on, so I’m going to speculate wildly: * You look exactly like someone who makes him uncomfortable (an ex, a dead loved one, an estranged relative, a coffee barista who once yelled at him) and he can pull it together to be normal during work conversations but just cannot do it during social conversations. * He has wronged you in some profound way (stolen your identity? dated your mom? poisoned your lunch?) and thus cannot look you in the eye unless he’s in work mode. * He is desperately in love with you. * He is desperately in love with your husband. * You have offended or alienated him in some way (you’re an anti-vaxxer / homophobe / Jordan Peterson fan). In fact, it could be about bigotry on either side — like you’re religious and he’s a bigot, or he’s religious and thinks you’re a bigot. That’s all I’ve got. As for what to do, you can just continue to ignore if it that feels easiest to you! But if you want to address it (and I would), the next time you’re talking privately you could ask, “Have I done something to bother you? I’ve noticed that you won’t look at me when we’re in conversations with others, even when you’re speaking to me, and I wondered if I’d done something to put you off in some way.” I don’t think you’ll necessarily get a real answer (you probably won’t), but it might nudge him into realizing that whatever’s going on, it’s coming across really weirdly to you, and I bet he’ll make an effort to stop. However, there’s a chance (maybe a big one) that it’ll make the relationship more awkward — that you’d be swapping the not-looking-at-you awkwardness for a new kind of tension that we can’t even anticipate. So you’d have to decide, based on what you know of him and the dynamics between you, whether it makes sense to speak up or not. But it’s weird weird weird. Updated to add: The letter-writer has noted in the comments below that there are many women in the office besides her and he doesn’t do this with them (so it’s unlikely to be a Mike Pence won’t-talk-to-women situation), nor is she a minority of any kind (in response to speculation of racism). You may also like:is it reasonable to expect to be thanked when I go out of my way for a coworker?my employee never apologizes when his mistakes cause extra work for other peoplemy coworker has punched and kicked me under the table at meetings { 574 comments }
false affair rumors, a boss who talks of self-harm, and more by Alison Green on July 14, 2021 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. How to handle false affair rumors Your recent post about the suspicious boyfriend reminded me of something that happened to me six years back, and I’m curious how you’d handle it. At the time I was new to the company and being trained by Sansa, a young but knowledgeable employee. Training needs meant we spent a large amount of time together at work. We didn’t socialize or interact outside of the office. One day we both happened to come in five minutes late. It was a pure coincidence — I missed my alarm and she got stuck in construction traffic. But a rude coworker quipped, “Sansa’s never late for work. Y’all must have had a good night.” The out-of-line coworker left before I could respond. Sure enough, people started looking at us funny when we’d sit down for training and I had a frank discussion with Sansa that we should keep the training sessions short to avoid damaging both of our reputations. Going to management did nothing — the offending employee was a 30-year-veteran and no one wanted to hold her accountable for anything. Obviously denying the affair rumor and moving on is the direct solution, but it doesn’t work for obvious reasons (as politicians demonstrate). Working with a social microscope on your behavior over a false rumor of impropriety is upsetting, but it seems anything one can do to mitigate it just makes the problem worse. What’s the best approach to handling this scenario with a minimum of disruption and career impact? If it were just the one comment and then some funny looks, in some ways that’s harder to deal with than if the comments had been ongoing — because at least if then you’d have an easy opportunity to address them and shut them down. But also, a single joking comment doesn’t usually lead to weeks of suspicion, so I wonder if your coworker said some additional things outside of your earshot (or, alternately, that you read too much into the looks you were getting and no one was really thinking about it at all). With the benefit of hindsight, it would been good to have called your coworker on it right when she made the inappropriate remark. Ideally, as soon as she mentioned your “good night,” you would have looked shocked and said, “Excuse me, what do you mean by that?” and “No. Don’t say things like that about me again.” But it’s easy to realize that afterwards and much harder when you’re taken off-guard in the moment. Assuming she didn’t continue to make comments, though, there wasn’t much you could do afterwards besides just continuing to be professional. And I’m not sure anything more was needed anyway! It’s annoying to have colleagues possibly speculating on your private life (and your management should have spoken with your coworker about her comment), but unless it came up in other ways, it might not have called for any action from you. 2. When a boss shares thoughts of self-harm My wife, Pam, is an executive assistant to a senior vice president. Her boss, Michael, has a history of being dramatic, a hypochondriac, and over-sharing. He has significant health issues, which doesn’t help when paired with his anxiety and reluctance to ask for help from actual professionals. Outside of his wife, Michael basically doesn’t have a social life outside of work, so his direct reports tend to fill in for his lack of close friendships. Today, Michael was telling Pam the details of his recent visit to the doctor. His concerns were based on the experience of one of their other coworkers who was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. Michael felt he shared a number of symptoms with this coworker, so he went in for testing. During the appointment, Michael did not tell his doctor about his changes in mood, nor his thoughts of self harm, though he did go into some detail with Pam about methods he has devised for taking his own life. And he told her that sometimes he just goes home and lays on the couch thinking about doing it. Given Michael’s history, it is possible he is just doing this for attention. However, Pam is concerned by the level of detail he gave and the fact that he hid this information from his doctor and his wife. She doesn’t want him to hurt himself but doesn’t know what, if anything, she can or should do here. Going to someone at work to express these concerns could cause Michael to feel like she betrayed his confidence. This is made more difficult by the fact that one of Michael’s work friends is Toby in HR. (The only other person in HR is Meredith, who has garnered several complaints for spreading gossip.) But if Pam doesn’t tell anyone what’s going on and he harms himself, then she will be stuck with the guilt of having known but taking no action. It feels like a bit of a lose/lose situation for her. Do you have any advice on if or how she should address this? This is awful. I feel for Michael, but this is far above Pam’s pay grade and it absolutely cannot be on her to listen to her boss’s suicidal thoughts or try to parse out how serious he might be. That’s not fair to her and it’s not fair to Michael, who needs to talk with someone who can truly help and who isn’t constrained by the power dynamics he has with Pam. Ideally Pam would talk with HR and ask them to intervene, but if that’s not an option*, is there someone else she can speak with? My first choice for that would be Michael’s boss, but she could also talk with a peer of Michael’s if the person has good judgement and seems like they’d handle it well. Whoever she chooses, the goal is for that person to then figure out next steps and move this away from Pam, who can’t be responsible for her boss’s mental health. * But are you sure Toby isn’t an option? His being Michael’s friend doesn’t necessarily rule him out (in some cases it could even make him better suited to handle it, but only if he has good judgement and some degree of skill). 3. Should my resume include that I was a National Merit Scholar? Can you please settle an ongoing dispute for me? My mother thinks that I need to indicate on my resume, LinkedIn page, etc. that I was a National Merit Scholar to “show that (I’m) smart.” I think that I’m beyond that point, and based on reading your website, suspect that like SAT scores and high school extracurriculars, such awards are no longer relevant more than a few years past graduation. I’m in my late 20s, though due to a series of unfortunate circumstances, the jobs I’m applying for are still more or less entry-level. Do I need to listen to my mom and post this award near and far, or should it be quietly forgotten at this point? Yeah, it doesn’t belong on your resume at this point. Nothing from high school should stay on your resume once you graduate college, or at least after a few years post-college-graduation. At that point employers want to see what you’ve accomplished as an adult, not what you did in high school. 4. I’m being reprimanded for following the chain of command For context, I work for a small public agency. We had a new director come onboard in January and we had a lot of hope for her, but she’s turning out to be kind of a nightmare. The transition process was slow, as she was coming over from another agency and had to wrap up there before coming over to us. I didn’t have my first conversation with her or the deputy she brought with her until mid-April. While she was transitioning, my main point of contact was our deputy director, who was acting director until she came over, and who remained acting director for a few extra months because of the length of the transition. He recently resigned for greener pastures, and now the current director is re-litigating directions that he gave us, saying that we should have gotten approval from her directly since he was only the deputy director at the time, although he was the only person from our office she was regularly communicating with and, since we were below him in the organization, it just made sense to take direction from him. Going around him to get her approval would have felt wrong and insubordinate. I’m baffled by this. If my supervisor tells me to do something, why would I go above him to see if that’s okay? I’m not crazy, right? For context, he wasn’t even my direct supervisor; he was another level up from my direct supervisor, so even more reason why I would follow his directions. He’s been contacted by other employees who are having the same issues and has stated he’s willing to back us up and I have, like, CVS-length receipts for every action I’ve taken (I started compiling a thorough CYA file as soon as this issue began), but none of that seems to matter to her. Someone once said you can’t use logic to talk someone out of a position they didn’t use logic to get into, and that seems to be the case here. Any advice? Yep, this is bizarre. But since your perfectly reasonable logic doesn’t seem to work with her, can you have one blanket conversation that covers the whole issue — for example, “Until you came officially on-board, I’d been following Ned’s directions, as at the time my understanding was that was the chain of command I needed to follow. It’s only recently that you’ve shared that you would have preferred I communicate directly with you. That means that we’re going to uncover quite a few things that you weren’t in the loop on and which Ned directed. I will of course consult with you going forward, but that’s the history on this and why it’s unfolded that way.” That said, if the issue is less that you’re being reprimanded and more that she’s having you undo past actions and redo them differently … generally that’s her prerogative as director (unless there’s an unusual situation in your agency that means it’s not). 5. Is there a way to say “please don’t tell my boss I’m applying” in my cover letter? I work for a small company that’s based in a co-working space. If I’m interested in switching jobs, many of the best companies in my industry are in this same location. Should I include in my cover letter that I’d appreciate them not telling my current company I applied, or is it just a given and I’m being paranoid? It’s usually understood as a given, but if you want to be extra safe, you could include something like, “Since we work in the same space, I should note that my current employer does not know I’m looking and I’d appreciate you treating this application as confidential for now.” It’s likely unnecessary, but no one should penalize you for including that. You may also like:my employee started a false rumor that two coworkers were having an affairmy ex works at my new job, using an affair partner as a reference, and moreI lied to my boss and said I've been doing a task I haven't actually done { 212 comments }
do employers set up secret “gotcha” tests for job candidates? by Alison Green on July 13, 2021 A reader writes: A few years ago, I was applying to a position (entry level, only about a year or so out of college) and I noticed a fairly obvious spelling error in the job posting. It has been a few years so the exact error escapes me now, but it was one that was very easy to miss (I only noticed because I was so nervous I had taken to reading the listing a bit obsessively before sending my application). Since the job was specifically calling for someone with solid editing skills, I mentioned it in my cover letter. Something like, “Just a heads-up, but I noticed that instead of xx it says zz on the website.” I ended up getting an interview and they mentioned that they had put it there as a test, something to see if people were paying attention. Now, I think this is a slightly annoying practice, (not sure if you agree or not) but it has stuck in the back of my mind over the years. And now, if I am applying to a job and I notice an error on a post, I can’t stop myself from calling it out. Partially because I am paranoid that it could be a test, but also because I have been in a role where I have been responsible for that content posted on a website, and if I had accidentally left an obvious error out there, I would want to know! Sometimes I get a thank-you, and occasionally I think that this does help my cover letter stand out. Even so, I brought this up to a recruiter friend, who told me that no matter how hard I tried to sound helpful and polite, I would inevitably come across as condescending and I was most likely hurting my chances. So what are your thoughts? Am I making myself stand out in the “hey, look at her attention to detail” way? Or in the “dear god, wouldn’t she be the worst person to have on an email chain, I bet she would reply all when you used the wrong form of their, there, and they’re” kind of way? I have yet to run into another person who has specifically mentioned that this is a “test,” though I have seen other listings that include similar things. (I’ve seen some “tests” that are innocuous, like asking your favorite candy bar or book or asking you to solve a simple math problem, but none that go so far as to expect you to notice a small spelling error.) I recently had an interview where the recruiter listed out a bunch of software and asked if I was familiar with any, and I had to admit that I hadn’t heard of a few of them, only for him to admit that he had made two of them up, just to see if I was lying about my experience. Am I alone in finding this annoying? Gotchas are always annoying. But they’re also pretty rare in hiring. Very few employers will put intentional errors on their website just to see if candidates notice. For every candidate who notices and says something, there will be 10 more who notice and don’t say anything (because they worry about being seen as presumptuous or even rude, like your recruiter friend said), and others will think the lack of proofreading of a public posting reflects poorly on the employer. Smart employers who want to assess candidates’ proofreading skills or attention to detail do that via exercises during the hiring process. The same is true of that interviewer who asked you about fake software — that’s not a common thing. It’s also weirdly adversarial and will turn off good candidates. (“I wanted to see if you were lying about your experience” — what?) In general, most employers aren’t laying traps for people. Of course, you can always find interviewers who are outliers — interviewers who do bizarre things like ask to look inside your purse or tell you to make dinner for 20 people or pretend there’s a fire to see how you’ll react — but most employers don’t do things like that. In fact, I’d argue gotchas are often a red flag. Interviewing is a two-way street, and part of what you should be looking for is an employer who operates straightforwardly and transparently. As for what to do if you see a typo in another ad sometime: Eh. I’ve seen applicants point out typos well, and I’ve seen them do it wrong. (I’ve also seen people point out “mistakes” that weren’t actually mistakes. Which is … not good.) In general, I’d err on the side of not doing it unless you’ve been invited to, because offering up unsolicited edits can come across as annoying at least as often as it comes across helpfully. There’s a small potential upside but a larger potential downside. You may also like:pointing out grammatical errors in job ads, HR called me "fragile" in a public document, and morecorrecting your boss’s grammar, coaching a peer, and moreoffice parties with secret destinations, getting your nails done at lunch, and more { 282 comments }
why haven’t I heard back after my interview? by Alison Green on July 13, 2021 You had a great job interview, seemed to connect with your interviewer, and left feeling good about your chances. The employer told you to expect to hear something in a week … but now two weeks have gone by and you’ve heard nothing. Should you reach back out? Is the silence a bad sign? And for the love of god, why are they putting you through this? If there’s one experience nearly every job seeker has, it’s this one. Even employers who provide candidates with very precise timeline for when they plan to be in touch (“we will reach out to all applicants no later than the 15th”) often miss their promised deadlines – sometimes by a lot – without bothering to update you. And some employers never get back to candidates at all, instead just full-on ghosting them even after multiple rounds of interviews. At New York Magazine today, I wrote about why this happens and what you can do about it. You can read it here. You may also like:I'm so anxious about working that I keep ghosting employers before I startwhen should I follow up after a job interview?is this HR person dragging out a hiring process just to keep herself employed? { 137 comments }