A reader writes:

I’ve been working for a company for 10 years, and after my immediate line manager had an accident, I was “promoted” to supervisor (not manager) in his continued absence.

My contract as supervisor states that my position comes with a company car, the personal use on which I pay the correct tax for. However, it has repeatedly come up in conversation with my bosses that they will use this car as and when they see fit, because although the nature of our business is door-to-door, only my car is insured. Previously I’ve been told that I must leave my car for others to use when I’m not working (holidays, etc.), and when I was off sick, they attempted to take my car for their use instead of going through the proper channels of using their own vehicles, recording the mileage, and claiming the correct fuel refund.

I find this unfair on many levels, not least because I do not have a private car, I am very busy with my own job, and I am now expected to drop off and pick up other members of staff despite them having their own cars, as “we’re not giving another fuel allowance as we’ve already got a club car.” Another member of the staff receives a fuel allowance despite being a) office-based and b) uninsured for work business. I feel I am being penalized as I’m on the lowest wage in the department, and it is not my problem if other members of staff will not insure their vehicles correctly. It is also affecting holidays, as there are days I cannot have off as no one is insured to deliver paperwork to other properties.

Can you advise me on what rights, if any, I have over this? Or would be I be better off requesting that they change the nature of the car to a pool car so that no one could use it for personal business, and my tax would reduce?

So you’ve been given the “benefit” of having a company car that’s supposedly partly for your own personal use — which you pay taxes on — but anyone else can use this car whenever they want, you have to leave it at the office upon demand, and you have to act as a chauffeur for other employees? Oh, and you can’t get certain holidays off because of it?

You do not have a company car. You have the company albatross.

Stop letting them engage in this charade. Tell them that you’re returning the car and do whatever paperwork is necessary to relinquish any tax-related responsibility for it.

While it may have sounded like a benefit originally, it clearly isn’t one. It’s an anti-benefit.

{ 1 comment }

A reader writes:

I recently just got laid off from work and I’m back on the market looking for jobs. I’ve seen other colleagues/friends/peers send out mass emails to notify their network and request assistance in looking for jobs. Is this a good idea or bad idea?

You definitely want to let people know that you’re looking, and what you’re looking for. You never know who in your network might know about an opening that you’d be perfect for, and your chances of being considered go up when you have someone connected to the job saying, “Hey, you should really consider Jane, because ___.”

As for the mechanics of how to do this … You can send out a mass email, sure. And realistically, if that’s the only way you’re going to get it done, then do that, because it’s way better than not doing it at all. But it’s even more effective if you send individual emails to people instead of one group email. That’s because people are a lot more inclined to help when they feel like you’re reaching out to them directly. Think about how you feel in similar shoes: If you get a mass email from a friend asking a bunch of people to, say, donate to a charity she’s supporting, you may or may not spend time thinking about it. But if that friend reaches out to you personally, you’re going to feel more responsible for really thinking over the request and maybe acting on it. When people see that they’re one of many being asked, there’s a diffusion of responsibility, a feeling that others will be taking care of this so the urgency is lowered. So if you can, do individual emails.

As for what to say in these emails, make sure that you explain the sorts of things you’re looking for, and then directly ask for what you’d like them to do. And don’t just say “let me know if you hear of anything” because lots of people never pay attention to job openings around them. Instead, be more specific:  Tell them to let you know if they hear of anything, yes, but also ask them to think about whether they know anyone it would be helpful for you to talk with, and tell them that you’d be interested in connecting with people even if there’s not a suitable opening right now.

Oh, and attach your resume to make it easy for them to forward around.

And remember that there’s no shame in doing this; it’s actually very common, and most people are glad to help if they can.

What other advice do people have?

{ 24 comments }

Too often I see people missing the signs that they might be in danger of getting fired or laid off, or that it’s simply time for them to move on to something else.

Over at U.S. News & World Report today, I talk about some of the signs that are telling you that it might be time to look for another job. You can read it here.

{ 9 comments }

A reader writes:

In my recent job hunt, I was fortunate enough to interview with two companies. Company B contacted me about an interview at a point where I had already received a verbal offer and was waiting on physical offer from Company A. I firmly believe nothing’s final until it’s in writing, and went to interview with Company B while waiting to here back from Company A. I was straightforward with Co B and told them of my situation, but interviewed enthusiastically. Co B then asked me to come back for a second round, right at the time I received my offer from Co A.

I responded to Co B that I had received my offer, and would be in touch with them when my decision was finalized. Co B recruiter was very insistent that I try to come back in for a second round, but it just was not feasible.

Co A was my preferred choice based upon a variety of factors, benefits, work hours, change and growth opportunity from my current role, etc. So I followed up as I said I would with Co B (by email), thanking the recruiter for the opportunity, but explaining I had taken the other position.

The recruiter followed up with a rather harsh email regarding their disappointment that I was not a serious candidate (since I wouldn’t come in for the second round) and had not taken the process seriously and considered the opportunity, and further how disappointing my communication, that I had emailed not called, was.

I responded with a very brief apology and thanked her for the feedback, as I truly do not intend to give such an impression and would hope to never leave such an impression again.

Now to my actual question: Does this sound like just a frustrated recruiter, or is that bridge really good and burnt? (Co B was a fantastic opportunity and given a different set of circumstances I’d love the opportunity to work there.)  I realize it’s a small world and we may run into one another again. How much might this damage my reputation long term? And furthermore, what is the right way to follow up with a recruiter after a great interview where your interest in the position may have waned? I suppose I could have been more forward from the start, or declined the interview from the start?

You did nothing wrong. The recruiter with Company B was completely off-base in implying that you did. You were straightforward with them from the start about your situation and kept them updated about your circumstances.

In fact, you went above and beyond what you were obligated to do: It would have been perfectly reasonable to have interviewed with them originally without disclosing that you were awaiting an offer from another company. And frankly, you could have bowed out after the first interview for any number of reasons unrelated to getting a different offer — didn’t think it was the right fit, decided to stay at your current job, whatever — and that would have been completely legitimate and reasonable. And a good recruiter would have been appreciative that you were honest about your lack of interest so that they didn’t invest additional resources in you.

So the recruiter is out of line. However, it’s understandable that you want to preserve the relationship since she may be your connection to a job you want in the future. You can’t always make unreasonable people reasonable, of course, but you could try saying something like: “I really appreciate your work in connecting me with this opportunity, even though it ultimately wasn’t the one I chose to take. I thought Company B was fantastic because of X, Y, and Z, and I was glad to get the chance to talk with them. I hope you understand that I didn’t want to waste their time once I’d decided to take an offer somewhere else instead, but that’s no reflection on the opportunity itself. If I think of candidates who might be a strong match, I’ll send them your way.”  It’s much nicer than she deserves, but the goal here is to preserve the bridge, not to fight for the principle of the thing.

If you can, I’d also recommend following up with the hiring manager who you interviewed with there to explain that you ultimately accepted another offer but think their company is fantastic and would love to stay in touch.

{ 26 comments }

Have you ever had the experience of showing up on your first day at a new job, excited to start, only to discover that your new office isn’t at all prepared for you?  Maybe ended up telling you to sit and read company materials while they figured out what to do with you on your first day?

If you’re a manager and have ever done this to a new hire, you must vow right now never to do it again! Not only is this a waste of a new employee’s time, but it sends a damaging message about your culture. Instead, the message you want to send from day one is that you’re organized, efficient, and running a tight ship.

Over at the Intuit QuickBase blog today, I talk about how to prepare for a new staff member the right way. You can read it here.

{ 97 comments }

It’s short answer Sunday — seven short answers to seven short questions. We’ve got a frustrating interview question, last-minute job applicants, and more. Keep reading…

1. What’s up with this interview question?

In an recent job interview, I was asked this head-scratcher (well, it’s a head-scratcher to me): “When assigned a project, do you think it’s more important to make deadlines and submit work that is not perfect or do you feel it’s acceptable to submit work late, but make sure it’s perfect?” So, this is one of those “it depends” answers, and it depends on many factors, but the interviewer just wanted my opinion only on those two options. I was wondering what your opinion is on this. And what is an interviewer looking for in the answer? Seems to me one is screwed either way you answer.

I hate these false dichotomies. Frankly, the right answer (to me) is, “It would depend on the project itself and my boss’s preferences.” Sometimes a deadline has flexibility and it’s more important to get the work perfectly right, and sometimes a deadline is utterly inflexible. And often it’s essential that it be both perfect and on-time, and you just do what you need to do to make that happen. Setting up the question as an either/or without further details is silly, and I’d refuse to pick one of those two options.

2. Applicants who apply at the last minute

How do you feel about job applicants who wait until the very last day/minute to apply for a position? I’m hiring and have had a posting up for just over three weeks and received plenty of applications, but received a mountain on the very last day (and I find this happens often). I have a hard time not regarding these applicants as procrastinators who may just as easily turn in their assignments at the very last minute. Granted a couple *could* have just discovered the posting but I somehow doubt that’s the case for all of them (and sadly I won’t know who’s who). If I decide to interview one of these applicants (and I often do), I do work in questions in some way or another about their prioritizing skills. But, with so many applicants who appear to be somewhat qualified (and inevitably I’ll need to weed some out in some way), is it wrong to count this as a strike against them?

Yes, it’s wrong. If you give a deadline, applicants are entitled to take you at your word that that’s the deadline. If you want their applications earlier, say so. After all, if you assign an employee a piece of work with a deadline of Friday, are you secretly penalizing them if they don’t turn it in by Wednesday? I hope not.

Plus, some of your best candidates are likely to be people who have a lot of other things going on in their lives (like focusing on achieving in their current jobs), and there’s no reason they should drop everything to apply when your job posting tells them that they have plenty of time.

(And I know that there are commenters who are going to be itching to jump on you for this, so let’s take this as a test of my recent call for civility.)

3. My high school changed its name

My high school changed its name the year after I graduated. Should I use the old name (the one I graduated from) or the new name? I don’t want the company to think that I am lying about my educational background if they do a search and cannot find my school. I also don’t want to disqualify myself on online applications.

Why are you mentioning high school at all? It certainly doesn’t belong on your resume. And if online applications are asking for it — wait, do they do that? What the hell? Well, if they do, use the current name, as that’s how the institution is now known.

4. My store locks us in at night

Each department in my store is “checked out” before you can leave to clock out for the night. However, the front doors are locked and we have to wait until everyone is checked out until we are let out of the store, I have always waited at a minimum of 5 minutes but have waited up to 20 minutes. This is unpaid and if we do attempt to leave we are terminated. Is this legal?

Nope. Federal law requires that you be paid for any time that you’re required to be at work. They owe you for every one of those minutes. Plus, if they’re truly locking you in, they’re also violating OSHA laws.

5. Awards from high school and college

I am a minister (a degree and everything). At age 15, I began working in ministry positions (paid summer staff at a Christian camp). From age 16-19, I was also in professional radio (mainstream “Hits,” DJ, morning show programmer). In high school and college, I won awards for speech and acting (dramatic, comedic, improv). Now I’m 31, and I feel my communication experience in these areas is still valid and useful, but I’m struggling with how to position these in describing my experience. I haven’t won any awards since college (chili cook-offs not withstanding). Any ideas or suggestions? A different perspective? I want to look my best on paper, and I’m not sure how to do that.

You can’t really use the high school stuff. You can probably get away with including the college stuff for a little while longer, but a hiring manager is going to legitimately ask, “What have you achieved since then? And if not much, why not?” And that’s what you have to figure out how to work around.

6. Is salary history the new discrimination?

I have been in sales, a sales manager, business manager, operations and business development professional, among other things. I have a wealth of experience and history to be a viable candidate for many roles in and outside of my industry. However, over recent years I have found it difficult to find employment for a variety of reasons. One that baffles me among the normal under/over qualified, wrong industry, etc. is this — I have either made too much money or did not make enough money in my previous positions. I actually applied for a few roles where the company mentioned that if the applicant did not make a certain salary at the current or previous role, then they need not apply.

Does this not sound like a hiring manager’s new mode of weeding out applicants based on salary since it cannot be done on sex, race, etc.? I believe this is an issue that needs to come to light.

There isn’t really a connection between weeding out applicants based on salary history and weeding them out based on characteristics like sex or race. Employers who weed people out based on salary history are doing so because they’ve decided that your previous salary indicates your worth on the market — and that if, for instance, they’re hiring for a job that pays $80,000 and your previous jobs haven’t paid you more than $40,000, you’re not yet at the level where you could do the work they need. Now, I happen to think that this is wrong-headed for a whole bunch of reasons (they should judge your worth for themselves, different sectors and geographic areas pay differently, etc.), but this is just about poor reasoning, not bigotry.

7. My boss wants me to keep interning … and interning … and interning

My boss offered me a 6-week internship, and told me at the time, that after those 6 weeks were up, we’d talk about a full-time job. After 6 weeks, I heard nothing, so I kept on working my hardest. After 9 weeks of the internship, they offered me a full time job. The catch? The full time job starts in 4 months, and they want me to continue my internship until then. Quite frankly, at this point, I need an income, and can’t pay for the gas to or from work (and there is no mass transit in the area). How do I tell my boss that I need pay, and can’t continue my internship, but still show interest in the job? Also, I couldn’t get the offer in writing, so how do I know I’m just not being taken advantage of and am going to be told “just kidding” at that time?

Say this: “I’m really excited about taking this job, especially after having been working here and seeing what a good fit it is. However, our original agreement was that I’d intern for six weeks, and I can’t afford to continue for another four months. Can we move up the start date?”  If you come to an agreement, your next step is to put it in writing yourself. Send your boss an email that says, “I just wanted to summarize what we agreed to, to make sure we’re on the same page. Does what’s here look correct to you?” And then list what you’ve agreed on — start date, title, rate of pay, etc. You can do this informally while still getting it in writing.

{ 147 comments }

I don’t know what’s going on in the comments section this past week, but this has generally been a reasonably respectful place where personal attacks are unusual, until this week when there’s been a sudden outbreak of nastiness. I’m not sure if it’s been the week-long “ask the readers” series or what, but I’m not happy about it.

It’s no more appropriate to be nasty to other commenters here than it would be to come into my home and be a jerk to my other guests. Cut it out.

The only thing I can think of to do is to turn on comment moderation, but I really don’t want to do that … so please consider this a call to return to the civility that typically reigns here.

{ 70 comments }

This is our last of our week-long “ask the readers” series. And this reader is in a particularly difficult situation. Be nice to him!

He writes:

I emailed you about a month ago about a position I had accepted that got frozen the day before I was to start. They finally reopened the position and I started Monday. Great, right? Not so much. About 4 years ago, my wife and I filed for bankruptcy. I was very up-front about this during the interview stage when they stated that I would be issued a company credit card.

So they had me apply on Monday for an American Express. It is not a company credit card; it is issued to you directly and, big surprise, AMEX turned me down. So now I am in a position where I cannot get the card and the only other option — short of being fired by the company, which I would rather not have happen — is for me to front the approximately $2,500 a month that the travel for this job will cost, and they will refund the money about 14 days after receiving the expense report. After doing the bankruptcy, I swore I would NEVER do credit again, and for 4 years we have lived on all cash.

Does anyone have any ideas how I can come up with the seed money (we have about a grand in our emergency fund)?

I wrote back to this reader and asked if he’d talked to his boss about the situation to see if he could just be issued a company-issued credit card. He said:

Oh yes, I asked. The HR manager said that the corporate rules are that you use the AMEX or you pay for all costs and turn in an expense report with receipts and they will pay you back in “about” 2 weeks. Since we will be going out 2 weeks at a time every month, it is possible the first 2 weeks will not paid to me before I am out in the field again.

This is a really difficult situation, not being made any easier by his company’s rigidity on this. What thoughts do people have?(And ideally this doesn’t need to be said, but just in case: No comments blaming this guy for his bankruptcy please! We don’t know what his situation was, and lots of people are in those shoes these days. And that’s not the point of this question; figuring out what he can do now is…)

{ 120 comments }

Here’s our next “ask the readers” questions — the second-to-last before our week of them ends tomorrow. A reader writes:

I have a staff of about 20.  About 7 of them go out every weekend to dinner, movies, bars, etc.  They like to talk about their evenings out at work in front of other staff that were not invited.  I have received many complaints from other staff that it makes them feel uncomfortable and left out.  How should I handle this situation? 

What’s your advice?

{ 123 comments }

It’s fast answer Friday! We’ve got coworkers who won’t train someone, how to answer your boss’s phone, and more. Here we go…

1. Who should have employee passwords?

Who should confidentially hold the usernames and passwords for employees’ server, e-mail and SharePoint access? Some say HR and some say IT. Put another way, are user names and passwords an IT issue or an HR issue? I believe in normalized data structure so primary data can reside in only one place. BOTH is not a satisfactory answer for me.

IT. HR doesn’t need them, and IT might. If your HR department is asking for them, it’s a sign they’re overreaching, probably on other stuff too.

2. When negotiating salary, how much more can you ask for?

There’s a job that I really want, and I feel I have a good chance of getting an offer. However, the salary stated in the posting is significantly lower than my current salary. This job has many other benefits, such as a better commute, better work environment, and a better schedule, but I’m living paycheck to paycheck as it is and can’t work for any less, and would ideally like to make 5 to 10 percent more. So I want to know–when negotiating salary after a job offer, is there a percentage that is a good starting point? Say 15 or 20 percent of the base salary listed? I don’t want to come off as arrogant or ignorant, but I also don’t want to undervalue myself (which is hard because right now, my field is oversaturated so there are plenty of people willing to work at well below market value).

There’s no hard and fast rule because things vary by industry and type of position, but if a salary was listed up-front in a job posting, then 15-20% more is a lot to ask for (because it raises the question of why you applied in the first place if you’re so far apart on salary, or at least why you didn’t raise the issue earlier in the process). 10% is closer to where you’re probably going to be able to end up, but again, there’s a lot of variation. Some companies (especially smaller ones) are waiting to find out what they’ll need to pay (based on what the people they want are willing to work for) and others have a very set range in mind and won’t consider going outside of it.

Ultimately, though, what you need to know is what the market rate is for this type of work in this particular field in this particular geographic area — and if your field is oversaturated with people willing to work for less, by definition that will lower the market rate.

3. Coworkers won’t give me the training I need

I’ve been at a company for 20+ years. Six months ago, I accepted a new position in a different department. My problem is there are two people in the group who are supposed to be training me but neither one seems to want to give up the information they have – they make excuses for not having the time to sit with me. I discussed this with the manager of the team but instead of speaking to these people individually, she made a general statement about the need for training to the whole team in a staff meeting. It didn’t change anything. What more can I do to get these coworkers to train me?

You need to go back to your manager and let her know that the problem has continued. You might suggest that it would be helpful for her to talk to them individually, since they seemed to have missed the message last time. And you can also try talking to the coworkers directly yourself and asking them point-blank to give you the help you need (be nice, not demanding, but be direct). But ultimately if you’re not getting what you need, your manager needs to know about it.

4. How can I help my new boss succeed?

Yesterday, my boss (the executive director of a professional organization) had his contract terminated by the Board. A colleague of mine was promoted as interim executive director, and the Board is hoping that he’ll take on the job full-time. He knows the organization, he’s really on the ball, and we have a good working relationship. I’m really hoping that he succeeds in the role. Is there anything I can do to help him settle in? (Other than doing my job well and making sure I’m available for him if he needs it, obviously.) We’re a very small office — right now it’s just the two of us, so it’s not like he can get help from other managers or shift some of his old responsibilities on anyone but me, and I’m not really qualified for a lot of them. (He’s an event planner, I’m an admin assistant.)

Ask him! Tell him that you’re thrilled to see him in the role and that you want to do anything you can to help. Ask him what would be helpful for you do to. And then ask again in a few weeks.

5. Help! My boss is leaving

I found out that my boss gave her notice and will be leaving soon. This is a devastating loss for the department and I am truly worried about how we are going to keep up with the workload without having someone there in her position. I’m worried that everyone’s work is going to suffer greatly and that I will be working 14-hour mad dash days until a new plan is created. My team is already overloaded with work and it’s very overwhelming thinking about how to keep up now that our manager will no longer be there.

Talk to your boss while she’s still there and tell her what you’re worrying about. Ask her advice, and ask what the plan is for keeping things running until a new manager is hired. Specific things you want to know: What’s the likely timeline for bringing in someone new? Who will you be reporting to until then? How will decisions that she normally made be getting made? Who will be covering X, Y, and Z? Are there things you can do to help out in the meantime? (If you’re interested, this can be a good time to rack up new accomplishments that can help you in the future.)

And once she’s gone, you should feel free to talk to your interim boss (which might be your current manager’s boss, or it might be someone else) and raise problems as they arise. But don’t be too anxious — this stuff happens all the time; it’s just part of business.

6. Online application systems that automatically screen you out

What do you think of job application systems that ask you a series of questions and automatically screen you out if you don’t meet the minimum qualifications? I recently submitted an application for a position requesting 6 years of experience and I only have 4. After answering a question on the online application about how many years of experience I have, I was immediately informed that I didn’t meet the minimum qualifications and I was rejected. I understand that hiring managers receive high volumes of applications and some way to screen them is necessary. However, it seems short-sighted to use such stringent measures to screen out candidates when there could be other equally valuable qualities they bring to the table (for example: less years of experience, but the experience is of a high quality). Shouldn’t a human being at least glance at the resume before it’s summarily dismissed? I’d love to know your opinion on this.

Yep, for the majority of positions, it’s short-sighted. Hiring shouldn’t be an automated process; a good hiring manager who really gets the value of having the best team possible looks at the totality of a candidate, which is something these automated systems don’t do.

7. How should I answer my boss’s phone?

I have a (hopefully) easy question. I’m an Executive Assistant and have taken on the added responsibility of answering my Executive’s desk phone (he used to answer all of his calls). This was a suggestion I made to save him time, and he loves it! But he doesn’t care how I answer the phone, so what do I say when I answer his line? My standard greeting is “Thank you for calling XYZ Company, this is Jane, how can I help you?” If I add “You have reached John Smith’s office” my greeting sounds too long. What is proper etiquette? When I don’t mention John Smith, the caller thinks they have dialed the wrong extension, then I have to explain that I am John’s assistant.

Oh yeah, that’s too long! You don’t need to give the company name (unless your company specifically wants you to, but I’d bet money that your boss wasn’t answering his own phone that way). Personally, I’d just say: “Robert Smith’s office.” If that feels too brusque to you, you can add in a “how can I help you?” but you don’t need to — it tends to be implied.

{ 82 comments }