our IT guy is an unresponsive jerk

A reader writes:

We’re a small company, and our IT department consists of one individual. He often works on high pressure, involved projects that affect the entire company. However, there’s no one on call for day-to-day issues like common printer problems or computer freeze-ups. He usually works with his door closed or is frequently off site, so contacting him is not always easy or direct. Direct interaction with him is almost unheard of, even when he’s in the next room.

He is also curt and dismissive, especially with junior staff—mostly part-timers, moms with kids—who don’t have a lot of experience troubleshooting computer problems. We do the best we can at solving our own problems and creating work-arounds, but sometimes we have to call on him when the problem is beyond our expertise. The complaint I hear most often is that he makes people feel stupid because they lack the technical vocabulary to describe exactly what’s wrong. I’m reasonably competent when it comes to IT issues, but even I have been subject to the heavy-sigh-and-eyeroll combo.

I’m middle management, and I get these complaints from my team. On occasion, I’ve escalated these complaints to my manager. I don’t like to do this, because I hate throwing a coworker under the bus—and the boss goes nuclear when he learns that problems are going unaddressed because people are afraid to approach the IT professional. (Aside: do not EVER call him the “IT guy.” You will be severely rebuked. He is the “IT professional” or the “Systems Administrator.”)

How do you deal with a crucial team member who’s uncooperative and/or unavailable?

It sounds like there are two different problems here:

1. Your company is relying on the same person to do high-concentration projects and to provide help desk support — when those are two very different roles with conflicting needs.

2. Your IT person is rude and kind of a jerk.

The first problem isn’t his fault, although he bears some of the responsibility if he hasn’t pointed this out to someone in a position to do something about it. If he lead the IT function in your company, it’s his job to say, “The current system we have isn’t working. We need someone who’s available for interruptions from staff when they need immediate help, and that can’t be the same person who needs to spend significant time on projects that require focus and concentration.” It’s also the job of someone above him to notice the same thing and address it, even if he’s not raising it himself. (And if I can see it from here, they should certainly be able to see it from there.)

It’s of course possible that the company can’t afford two separate full-time IT people, but if that’s the case, then they need to look at other solutions — contracting out help desk support, limiting the number of intensive projects the IT person is asked to do, telling staff members they’re on their own for day-to-day tech support, or whatever they decide makes sense. But it’s not tenable to just keep things are they are and let the situation go unaddressed.

As for the second problem — the fact that this guy is a jerk — that’s not okay, and his manager needs to address that head-on. Even if part of his job isn’t helping to troubleshoot tech issues (although it sounds like it is), it’s not okay for him to be curt and dismissive, roll his eyes at people, or otherwise make colleagues afraid to approach him. His manager needs to clearly tell him that he’s required to be polite and helpful, and that his performance is evaluated in part on whether people are getting the help they need from him … and that if they’re too afraid to approach him, he’s failing to perform a crucial part of his job.

Now, as for what you can do as a manager who isn’t his manager: You can and should continue to let your own boss know what’s going on. You mentioned that you hesitate to do this because your boss flips out when he hears it — but assuming he’s not, like, punching the guy, that’s not a reason to shy away from telling him. Someone should be reacting strongly about this. Don’t protect this guy from the natural consequences of his actions by not being forthright with your boss.

Depending on your relative positions in the organization, it might also make sense for you to speak to his boss directly to make sure that she knows what’s happening and how it’s impacting you and your staff.

And in many cases, it could make sense for you to say something to the dude himself. If he rolls his eyes at you or becomes curt, say something in the moment. For example:  “Let’s pause here for a minute. I’m confused by your reaction to this; my understanding is that part of your job is assisting with this. What am I misunderstanding?” Or “I really need you to talk more politely to my staff. I overheard your conversation with Jane just now, and she was asking you a reasonable question. I want to make sure my staff can get the help from you they need. Is there something you need us to do differently so that they’re treated more courteously?”

But do keep speaking up and pushing the issue. This guy is behaving this way because he’s apparently not being called out on it. Change that.

my boss wants me reachable by phone and email on the weekends, I think a coworker is fudging her time sheets, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss wants me reachable by phone and email on the weekends

I recently joined a new company as a middle manager, and I manage a team that works seven days a week. On arrival, I was given a work mobile and laptop. A couple of weeks later, my manager texted me with a work question on a Sunday morning (on my weekend off). I didn’t see the message until that evening and responded probably over 10 hours later. I did apologize for replying late but didn’t think it was a big deal as it wasn’t an important text and really could have waited until Monday morning. However, my manager pulled me into his office the next day to ask me about it. I said that my work phone just happened to be in a different room at home from me for most of the day and that is going to happen sometimes while I’m out of work. He said in no uncertain terms that it wasn’t okay and the expectation is that I am contactable outside of work due to the level I’m working at in case there is a work emergency and I should always be available by phone (with obvious exceptions such as while driving, at the theater, etc). He also mentioned I wasn’t checking my emails enough on my days off, as mistakes such as my team missing a deadline wouldn’t be picked up until I was actually working. I was at a similar level in my last job and never experienced anything like this.

Is this reasonable and normal part of moving up the ranks? I’m making more of an effort to meet his expectations, but I’m finding it quite stressful to feel so scrutinized while on my “rest days” and get quite anxious about keeping my work phone with me everywhere I go and checking emails frequently. In the evening, when I get home I sometimes forget to take my phone out of my bag and feel sick with panic when I realize it’s been in there for a few hours and I haven’t checked it and could have missed a message. It’s early days so maybe I just need to get used to it?

No, this is not reasonable or normal. It’s true that in some fields, as you move up the ranks, you may be called upon to answer urgent calls or emails outside of your normal work hours. I don’t know if you’re in one of those fields or not. But even in those cases, you’re not expected to answer things that aren’t time-sensitive over the weekend. In fact, a decent employer will usually prefer that you not, so that you save your energy for the stuff that does need urgent attention and so that you’re not entirely burned out.

If your team works seven days a week, you might need to train and deputize an assistant manager to handle things on the days you’re off. That person can contact you when something truly rises to the level of needing your involvement and can field all of the rest.

But no, it’s not reasonable to expect round-the-clock availability unless (a) it’s a norm in your field that they reasonably assumed you would have known about and you’re compensated well for it or (b) they disclosed it in the interview and you’re compensated well for it.

2. I work in payroll and think a coworker is fudging her time sheets

I was wondering if you could help me with a moral question I have. I work in payroll and we have timesheets for our few non-exempt employees. It’s an honor-based system executed in Excel. The employee sends their time – manager approves – I add to payroll.

This has worked for us so far, but one of our non-exempt employees might be ruining it. This employee happens to sit in the cube in front of me so I know that she routinely gets in half an hour late and leaves 15-20 minutes early. Her supervisor works on the other side of the office and would never know if she’s at her desk or not.

From reading your blog, I first thought it was none of my business; maybe she worked something out with her manager, and with her being in different department, her absence doesn’t affect my day at all so I tried not to let it bug me. The thing that I can’t get over is that she submits time sheets to me for payroll that are complete fabrications, saying she gets here on time every day and leaves on time and her manager approves them. I guess what I’m asking is, should I take it upon myself to tell her manager that she is submitting false time sheets?

It’s possible that there’s an innocent explanation for this — like that she does work in the morning before leaving her house or at night once she gets home, and that her manager has okayed that arrangement. But of course it’s also possible that she’s just fudging her time sheets.

Because you run payroll and you’re seeing this happen right in front of you day after day, it’s reasonable to say something to her manager, but you should phrase it in a way that doesn’t assume either way. I’d say something like this: “I wanted to mention to you that I noticed Jane’s time sheets report that she works 9-5 every day, but she frequently arrives at 10 and leaves around 4:45. I know she might have arranged this with you and it’s all above board, but I wanted to flag it in case it’s something you didn’t know and would want to be aware of.”

3. Can I ask for a different interview date?

I have actually gotten an interview for a job I really want. However, I am away on holiday. I could drive back, but obviously that’s a day out of my holiday. Are you entitled to ask for it to be brought forward from a Monday to the Friday before?

You can always ask. Say it this way: “I’d love to come in and interview. I’ll be out of town on (dates). Would it be possible to do it on the 15th or another day instead? If not, I can see if I can figure out a way to drive back.”

It’s possible that they’ll tell you that they can’t offer other dates (sometimes interview schedules can be rigid if an interviewer has to come in from out of town, for example), but it’s entirely normal to ask and they might be able to easily accommodate you. I’ll often offer just one or two dates initially because I’m trying to keep scheduling easy, but I’m happy to find other times if the ones I suggested initially don’t work.

4. How can I tell my friend her job-search gimmicks are a bad idea?

I have a friend who is currently looking for a new job in retail or service. Because I have some more experience than her in interviews and professional development, she’ll frequently ask me for advice. I have recommended your site, recounted what’s worked for me, and pointed her in the direction of career guidance services in our area.

She doesn’t seem to process this and does awful gimmicky stuff like printing her resume on colored paper to stand out, calling to follow up less than two days later, and visting stores/restaurants following the interview so that they’ll remember her.

I worry all this is turning employers off her and making her come across as pushy, but I don’t know how to say this tactfully. Any advice?

“I know you’re really trying to stand out to employers, but everything I read says that most employers see this kind of thing as gimmicky and too aggressive. It’s likely to hurt you more than help you. Here are a few articles about why this will turn off good employers.”

If that doesn’t work, though, you might just need to leave her to figure it out on her own. It’s a good sign that she’s seeking advice, but it’s not a great sign that she’s apparently ignoring it once she gets it.

5. Could an error in a job ad be a test to see if people notice it?

I have worked in editing for approximately 15 years. My experience includes fields that require meticulous language (such as medical documentation) and fields that allow for soft language (such as marketing brochures). Despite feeling confident in my ability to determine the appropriate time and place for precise writing, I’m stumped when it comes to job advertisements that include grammar or spelling errors. Should they be ignored, or mentioned? They’re almost certainly mistakes, but what if they’re tests, given my field?

Professional contacts give me mixed feedback. Responses include “Job ads go through a dozen hands before posting, so errors happen” and “You find fault with things for a living; you need to lighten up.” I’ve also been told that “I’d want to know that an editing applicant noticed, even if it was an error. If you said nothing, I’d wonder if you missed it.”

It’s almost definitely not a test (and if it is a test, it’s weird and a sign of a company with odd judgment). Good employers who want to test your editing will give you an editing test that’s clearly labeled as that. They’re not going to deliberately put errors in the job ad to see if you’ll point them out when they haven’t asked you to, especially since so many people would feel rude or uncomfortable doing that as a job applicant. That doesn’t mean you can’t mention it, especially if there’s a natural opening to do it in the interview, but I’d assume that’s optional and not a test of your abilities.

I talked to Second City! And the Billfold! And it was fun!

I’m interviewed on Second City’s podcast! Host Kelly Leonard is a ridiculously good interviewer (which makes sense — this is Second City, after all). We talked about my own bad bosses, aggressive huggers, and lots more.  I even share a story about marriage. Please listen to it here! (Or in iTunes here.)

Also today, I’m in an advice columnist roundtable at The Billfold, talking with their editor Ester Bloom (and author of The Toast’s Aunt Acid advice column) and BusinessLady (The Toast’s work advice columnist, who now has a new column at The Billfold). We talk about advice columns, the time I ghosted a job, and more. (There’s also a part two coming soon.) You can read it here.

my employee dresses like a slob

A reader writes:

We have a generally business casual office. I have a direct report who just dresses sloppily. He is by the book following the dress code, but he kind of looks like he just rolled out of bed. He is clean, but looks messy. He will wear a polo or henley shirt, but rarely tucked in. Often his pant hems are frayed. He wears shoes that are the ambiguous type that are sneakers but meant to pass as shoes. The clothes are baggy.

We work in IT so none of the techs care too much about looking fashionable, but pull off a reasonably professional look with a simple polo and khakis and belt. This person’s role is supposed to be more forward facing and collaborative with others across the organization, not just sitting in a room coding.

I am also concerned that, depending on how I approach this, he will tell me that X is wearing the same thing as he is. However, X looks put together, not like he rolled out of a hammock in his office. I think that this guy would rather be sequestered in his office or work from home, but that is not the reality of the job right now. He is hurting his prospects with the organization as a whole because my boss views this even more negatively than I do.

I don’t want to offend my employee, who does do good work. Any suggestions on how to discuss this and get the point across to someone who seems clueless about clothing?

I used to work with a guy who we affectionately called “the unmade bed” because he was sloppy in a similar way. It was fine in his case – his work didn’t require him to look particularly polished. But in your employee’s case, it sounds like there’s an actual work reason for him to look more pulled together.

I wonder, though, if you can narrow the scope of the issue and hone in on one or two changes that would make the biggest difference. For example, if he tucked in his shirt and lost the sneakers, it might not matter so much that his clothes are loose and his pant hems are frayed. If that’s the case, this gets easier to address. You can just say in a matter-of-fact way, “Hey, you’re pushing the dress code a bit – would you keep your shirts tucked in while you’re at work and swap out those sneakers for less casual shoes?”

But if that won’t do it, then just be as straightforward as possible with him. People tend to agonize over conversations about dress and grooming because it feels so personal, but the more you keep in mind that it’s not about him as a person or a condemnation of his personal style choices, the easier it will be. The way he dresses is fine for his life; it’s just not appropriate for this job. That matters because if you go into the conversation thinking “ugh, you’re such a slob,” it’s likely to come out in the framing and tone you use. But if you go in thinking “I want this guy to be noticed for his work rather than his frayed pants,” you’re more likely to sound like you’re on his side, which will give you both a better shot at an easy resolution.

It’ll also help to look at this like any other feedback conversation where you talk to him about something that you’d like to see change in his work – “here’s the issue, here’s what I need you to do differently to solve it.” For example, you could say: “Because your position works with so many other areas of the organization, it’s important that you look put together. When you leave your shirt untucked and wear sneakers and loose-fitting or wrinkled clothes, it doesn’t look pulled together enough for the visibility you have in this role. You don’t need to wear a suit; I’m just talking about fairly small tweaks.”

If you frame it that way, he shouldn’t be able to retort that a coworker is wearing the same thing. But if he does, you can simply explain whatever the difference is – that Bob’s shirts aren’t wrinkled, or they’re always neatly tucked in, or whatever the explanation is. And if relevant, you can also repeat that it’s his outward-facing role that makes the standards particularly relevant.

If he says that it’s unfair that he’s being judged on something other than his actual work, you can agree: “It is unfair. But the reality is that it will affect your credibility and I don’t want to see it take the focus off your work, which is excellent.”

Originally published at New York Magazine.

I’m required to share with my boss a weekly best and worst from my personal life

A reader writes:

My company reorganized and instituted a new policy for one-on-ones with managers. Once a week, at the start of our one-on-ones, I have to spend six minutes where my manager tells me the best and worse things in his personal life and I have to return the favor. We get three minutes each.

I don’t trust my manager enough to want to tell him any of the details of my personal life. He once told me that my personal life had no place in the office and told me that if, for example, if his son broke his leg or was otherwise seriously injured, that shouldn’t distract him from working as he normally would. But when I question these kinds of policies, he also gets upset and tells me I’m being hostile.

I’ve been preparing more neutral best/worst things in advance. But I’m dreading these weekly meetings now. Our company (400+ employees) doesn’t have an HR department and I don’t know who to discuss this with.

This sounds like a terrible misreading of the more common advice to open one-on-one’s by taking a moment to connect on a personal level. But that means saying “how’s everything going for you?” or “so have you finished the kitchen remodel yet?” or “how was your vacation?” or anything else that might help build rapport with a person you’re managing. It doesn’t mean demanding that they report to you on the best and worst moments of their week.

And really, what are they going for here with the worsts, in particular? They can’t possibly want you to talk about relationship problems, your breakdown in therapy, your kid’s drug problem, the midnight binge where you devoured everything in the fridge, or the fact that your husband is sleeping on the couch, right?

This is just terribly misguided. They’re going to get overshares from a small number of people and just make everyone else feel uncomfortable.

I suppose we can categorize this with other forms of contrived and misguided mandatory intimacy, like this and this and this.

If you had a decent relationship with your boss, I’d say to push back on this by saying something like, “Can we keep this informal? I like the idea of taking a couple of minutes to connect personally at the start of these meetings, but I’d rather not force it on the best/worst thing.”

But since it sounds like you already have a pretty strained dynamic, I’d just stick with really bland stuff. For example, for your bests: “I read a great book!” “I cleaned out the garage.” “I hung out with family.” And for your worsts: “Too much yard work.” “Cracked my phone.” “All this rain!” “Have a terrible boss.” If you really have to fill the whole three minutes, then by all means, go into great detail on any of these. I’m sure your boss would love to hear in detail about your garage-cleaning process.

My guess is that this will fall by the wayside within a couple of months because no one will really keep up with it (because it’s forced and unnatural). But for however long you’re stuck with this, keep in mind that there are lots of amusing stories for later in here, and that is your consolation prize.

I got in trouble for a Facebook spat outside of work, boss complained he was “the last to know” I’m pregnant, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss complained that he was “the last to know” I’m pregnant

I’m five months pregnant with my third, and now that I’m starting show I finally told my boss that I’m pregnant and will need maternity leave soon. Instead of a congratulations, he acted quite petty and put out, saying he knew I was pregnant because he could hear me and my coworkers discussing it, and he was hurt that he was the “last to know.” He said he doesn’t want me to think of him as a boss, but a friend, and I should’ve told him sooner. The thing is I don’t consider him anything close to a friend; he is a boss to me and nothing more. I told my coworkers earlier because we actually are close friends, and the reason I didn’t tell my boss sooner is because he tends to view pregnancy as a hardship on our business, and launches right into his “we only technically have to give you eight weeks.” speech. I just wasn’t in the mood for it yet.

I think his response was immature, and it’s my body and I could’ve waited as long as I felt comfortable with before telling him (obviously with enough time to prepare maternity leave coverage.) What do you think?

His response is the response of an ass. He doesn’t want you to think of him as your boss? Cool, so does that mean he’s not going to evaluate your performance, delegate work to you, or issue obnoxious reminders of the bare minimum amount of leave he’ll give you? (He’s also wrong about that amount if you’re in the U.S. and work somewhere with 50 or more employees; FMLA gives you 12 weeks.)

Of course he is your boss and not your friend. You had no obligation to tell him you were pregnant earlier, and he has no ground to stand on in claiming he shouldn’t have been the last to know. That’s ground that your mom has, not your out-of-touch boss.

2. I got in trouble for a Facebook spat outside of work

I had an online spat with someone on Facebook in my free time. They wrote an anonymous note to the company I work for saying that I called them names (I called them “whiny”) and that I set a bad example for the company, etc. My boss asked for screen shots but got no reply. Then she friended me on Facebook to find out if I had done this and gave me a verbal warning at work. Should she have done this? I feel my freedom of speech was violated.

Your boss was out of line, but your freedom of speech wasn’t violated, not in the legal sense. Your constitutional right to free speech protects speech from being censored by the government; it doesn’t regulate what private entities can do. In other words, your employer can indeed impose consequences for what you say, even outside work, and even if they’re being unreasonable in doing so. (There are a few state laws with exceptions to this; California probably has the broadest.)

That said, I can’t see how this was any of your employer’s business. Assuming that the person you were arguing with isn’t a coworker and that the subject of the conversation wasn’t related to your employer, this was a huge overreach by your manager. Personally, I’d go back to her and ask why you’re being warned for private, non-work conversations that you’re having outside of work with non-employees … but whether or not that would be smart to do depends on your dynamic with her, how unreasonable she is, and how much risk you’re willing to take.

3. We can’t get a word in during conference calls

My company recently merged with another company in another state. Some departments, including mine, ended up split between the two locations. Most of the upper-level management—my bosses— are in City B. There is a concerted effort to use tech to keep everyone on the same page, with lots of scheduled conference calls, with or without web-sharing, and someone from City B visits our offices in-person every 6 – 8 weeks or so.

The problem: conference calls can be awkward, with all the normal problems of meetings minus the ability to read facial expressions and body language. The folks in City B often start late. And more than a few of them really, REALLY like to hear themselves talk. It’s not uncommon for them to go off on tangents and then run out of time to cover everything or hear from everyone (why they so often run late, I suspect!). Sometimes when a City B person is opining at length and one of us in City A wants to add a comment/question/correction, we open our mouth and take a breath, ready to jump in at the next opening, only to be left gaping like a fish over the conference phone as the speaker plows right through any millisecond of dead air. When this happens repeatedly in the same meeting, we’re left feeling shut down/shut out, sharing frustrated looks with each other as the person on the other end blathers on.

With web meetings, we have the ability to “raise our hands” but since we’re usually not sharing documents it’s less common for us to do that vs. a conference call. Likewise, there is sometimes an agenda, stated at the beginning of the call or emailed beforehand, but not always.

We don’t want to be rude and raise our voices or interrupt someone, but it’s difficult to get a word in edgewise sometimes. Any tips on how to make sure we can contribute in a timely way and be heard in conference calls with our colleagues? (“Please try to be less of a windbag” or “Seriously, do you have gills? How can you talk so long without breathing?” might not go over so well.)

Whoever is running these calls is failing at facilitating them. That person should be cutting people off if they’re going on and on, and should be specifically asking if anyone on your end of call has anything to say.

So say something that person ahead of the next one. You should be able to be pretty direct and say something like, “On our end of the calls, we’re finding it really hard to get time to speak — people tend not to leave any room for us to jump in. Is there a way to specifically carve out time for us to talk — like checking in to see if anyone here has anything to contribute before the call moves on to the next topic?”

4. I tried to tell someone about a job lead over Skype and they removed me from their contacts

A couple of years ago, I left a job to pursue an opportunity at a growing company. At my former job, I oversaw the work (in a dotted lined capacity) of an associate with whom I thought I had a great working relationship. In the 5+ months we worked together, we had a great dynamic and got along well. This person was sharp and I always encouraged this person’s professional growth. I helped by offering access to resources and even bought this person some books on areas of our profession that interested this person as a gift before I departed.

This person has remained in the same position and could really do more now that they have a few years’ experience under their belt. I have the opportunity to expand my department and a job that might be a good next step for this person, so I recently messaged them on Skype regarding the potential position and to gauge interest. Instead of responding, I was removed from this person’s contacts.

I don’t want to read too much into it, but this move has me stunned. We left on good terms. Did I misread our dynamic? Did I breech some kind of etiquette here? Was this person concerned that my message would be seen by higher ups? Was Skype the wrong channel to reach out (even though we’d communicated previously via this method)? It seems like such an extreme response. If I made a misstep, I’d like to know to avoid things in the future.

I don’t think there’s any way to know for sure unless you ask her. I think Skype was an odd method to choose (versus phone or email) but not something outrageous that would warrant blocking you. It’s possible that it was a mistake (she clicked something without realizing it), or a moment of panic if it showed up on her work screen when her boss was walking by, or who knows what. Or, sure, it’s possible that you misread the relationship, but that sounds less likely than the other possibilities.

Do you have her personal (not work) email address? If so, I’d send her an email there and say you tried to relay this over Skype, aren’t sure the message went through, and won’t keep following up with her but just wanted to make sure the info about the job didn’t fall through the cracks. And then from there, leave it in her court.

5. I withdrew from a hiring process and they’ve contacted me again

Three weeks ago, I scheduled an interview with a company that I am a great fit for and where I have all the experience they’re looking for. Because of the distance, I decided to cancel the interview. Surprisingly, three weeks later they called me back to see if I was still interested and wanted to schedule another interview. At this point, I haven’t had luck in obtaining interviews, so I said okay to give it a shot. Is this a good sign that maybe they ran out of candidates and want to see if I would be a good fit?

It’s a sign that they think you might be a strong candidate, and probably that they’re not fully satisfied with the other candidates in their pool right now. I wouldn’t assume that it means you’re a shoo-in or anything like that, but reaching back out to you after you’d already withdrawn is definitely a good sign of interest.

That said, don’t give short shrift to your earlier concerns about the distance. Go to the interview and get more information, but three weeks of not getting interviews isn’t a long time and shouldn’t totally override your concerns about a long commute.

how do I get my friends and family to butt out of my job search?

A reader writes:

After leaving a less-than-great work situation to take a year off to deal with some family drama, I’m beginning to think about re-entering the work force. Because my spouse makes a very good income, there’s zero pressure. I can pursue long shots, indulge in a fun but low-paying job if I choose, or even retrain for a different industry. As I read about the travails of other job-seekers, I’m acutely aware that life is not fair in my favor in this regard.

I am a writer by aptitude and experience. I’ve held several writing-related positions. I have a lot of writer friends, and my mother is a writer. People in my orbit assume that writing is what I want to do professionally, and they’re often in a place to know about career opportunities for writers.

I’m grateful that my friends think of me when they see certain writing-related job postings, but to tell the truth, these jobs don’t really feel like they’d fit me. I think the people who send them to me also overestimate my qualifications, and recommend jobs for which I don’t believe I’d be competitive. (I’ve even applied for a few and haven’t gotten interviews, which suggests to me that my instincts are correct.)

At this point, I want the people in my life to butt out of my job search. Or, at the very least, I’d like them to just send me the job and leave it at that, rather than following up with me: “Did you apply? The deadline is today!” Some of them even try to grease the skids for me without asking first: “I told Arya I was reaching out to you about this. Here’s her contact info, if you’d like to chat with her about it.” This would all be fantastic, if I was a clueless new grad who needed some networking help, but I’m not. I’m a fortysomething who understands my industry and has a realistic view of my own marketability, and I have the ability to take my sweet time and look for the right job, and that’s what I plan to do.

I like these people. I want them in my life. I don’t want to alienate them. I love that they’re the kind of generous people who want to help a friend. I wouldn’t even mind if they continued to send me the occasional job link. But I need a script for kindly but firmly asking them to let me handle all this myself.

It’s weird, isn’t it, how people do this? It undoubtedly comes from a place of wanting to be helpful, but there’s something about knowing a friend or family is job searching that seems to melt (some) people’s boundaries. “Did you apply? The deadline is today!” is a pretty big overstep, and I have to think that people aren’t pausing to think about whether that’s something you’d welcome.

In any case, what to say depends on whether you want them to butt out entirely or whether you do want them to continue sending you occasional listings.

If you want them to butt out entirely, it’s actually a little easier. You can just say, “Thanks so much for thinking of me when you see job openings, but I’m being pretty picky about what I apply to. So no need to send these, but I appreciate the thought!” Or, if the relationship allows for more bluntness: “I’ve got this. Thank you for wanting to help, but I actually prefer to do this on my own.” You could add, “But it’s really nice of you to be thinking about this.”

If you’re fine with people sending listings but just don’t want them to nag you with follow-ups and you’re willing to be pretty blunt (because I can’t think of a way to say this that isn’t fairly blunt), you could say, “I’m sure you don’t intend this, but it can create weird pressure when you follow up to make sure I’ve applied. I’m actually being pretty picky about what I apply to, but if it feels like the right opening, I’ll be on it! But it’s really thoughtful of you to send me listings.”

And related, in case you need it:
how can I make people stop talking to me about my job search?

why you shouldn’t work off-the-clock

If you’re like a lot of American workers, you’re no stranger to staying late at the office or responding to work emails well into the night. In fact, 81 percent of U.S. salaried employees report that they work outside of their standard work hours, with 29 percent doing it three or more days per week, according to a new survey from Harris Poll.

What’s more, working outside of normal work hours is so ingrained in American workers that a majority of full-time salaried workers in that Harris Poll survey said they would continue to do so even if it were against company policy.

Working off the clock might seem like it should be an employee’s choice; after all, if you’re willing to put in unpaid time to catch up on work, make sure a project goes smoothly or ensure you don’t come in to find 100 emails waiting for you in the morning, why shouldn’t you be allowed to? But there are some really good reasons why you shouldn’t work off the clock.

It’s illegal. First and foremost, if you’re among the majority of people who the law says must be paid overtime, your company would be breaking the law by allowing you to work off the clock. It doesn’t matter if you’re doing that work voluntarily; you can’t waive your right to overtime. And if you just work the overtime anyway and don’t log it, that could get your employer into a lot of trouble later. You would have the legal right to claim back pay and penalties from your employer later on, even if you were “volunteering” the time originally. So letting people work off the clock, even if they want to, is a serious risk for employers.

It gives your employer bad information about what it takes to get your job done. Your manager needs to know what can reasonably be accomplished in your position in 40 hours, in order to make accurate decisions about budgeting, staffing levels and work priorities. If you’re secretly working off the clock and your manager plans your team’s workload around that level of productivity, what’s going to happen if you suddenly decide you don’t want to or can’t put in those extra hours anymore? Furthermore, by working off the clock, you’re potentially making it harder for your manager to increase the staffing on your team, because if all the work is getting done, the company has less incentive to spend money on a new hire.

It’s bad for your coworkers. If the rest of your coworkers are following the law and company policy and not working unauthorized overtime while you’re secretly making an exception for yourself, you’re going to throw off the expectations for everyone. Your manager is likely to wonder why your co-workers aren’t producing at the same levels that you are, and that can ramp up the pressure and stress on them. Plus, it’s going to be really bad for the person who replaces you when you move on at some point. That person will be burdened with an unrealistic workload because you set unrealistic expectations about how much could be done with the time available.

You deserve to be paid. Worker protections have been hard won. People fought – and in some cases even died – for your right to be paid fairly for the time you work. And you have agreed to provide a particular amount of work in exchange for money, not to sign over all your free time to your employer.

If you can’t realistically finish all your work in 40 hours, the solution isn’t to work off the clock and not tell your boss. Instead, in most cases you should talk with your manager about what you can and can’t get done and how you should be prioritizing things. And yes, in reality there are indeed some managers who will tell you to just find a way to get it all done, but good, reasonable managers will want you to raise the issue.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

should I get extra support when I’m on probation at work?

A reader writes:

After three years of hard work for and dedication to a small nonprofit (less than 50 employees), I was recently put on probation for low productivity and inability to meet deadlines. I admit I’ve been distracted by a personal situation; I recently had a baby and am having a hard time dealing with leaving him in daycare, where I suspect he may not be getting the attention and development he needs. My postpartum depression support group is helping, but I still have moments every day when I feel paralyzed by anxiety and sadness.

Fortunately, the organization employing has a deep philosophy about overcoming obstacles and setbacks, so this isn’t the kind of probation where they want to fire me and are just going through the motions to check boxes to avoid legal consequences. So I know I’m on probation with a sincere hope that I improve.

However, I’ve only been given vague metrics for measuring success — meet deadlines, improve productivity — and absolutely no advice or support on how to do that. I am expected to overcome my obstacles, and they sincerely hope that I do, and that’s it. It’s summer, and the organization president is on vacation a lot; meanwhile, my direct supervisor has reduced her hours in advance of retirement, and now only comes in one or two days a week. So I’m being told, meet your deadlines and be more productive, but I’m actually being offered less structure and support to help me do that.

I know what I need in order to stay on task: I need somebody checking in with me and giving me feedback. Eventually I can develop better habits, but in these critical three months of probation, I need support. I’ve expressed this to the organization president and was told I should continue reporting to my supervisor, even though she isn’t present most of the time and doesn’t check her email when she is out, and I have reason to suspect she never reads my reports. There isn’t anybody else within the organization to whom I can report.

In short, I am being under-managed in a dramatic way and at a critical moment. Instead of reducing my anxiety, it’s being compounded by this situation, making me even less productive. I still have two and a half months to turn this around and keep my job.

So what do you do when you aren’t getting enough management?

Well, I can see where they’re coming from — meet your deadlines and get your productivity back to where it used to be is actually pretty straightforward. (I’m assuming you have a decent idea of what they mean on the productivity front, since it sounds like you agree that you’ve fallen off there.)  It would be different if they weren’t telling you what good work looks like or not being clear about what you need to do to improve; these are things that managers usually expect employees to do on their own, without needing a ton of oversight to do it.

It there were a work complication that made meeting deadlines and raising your productivity difficult — like if your workload was way too high to realistically meet all your deadlines or if your productivity depended on getting input from others who weren’t providing it — then yes, I’d expect your manager to sit down with you and hash that through.

But it doesn’t sounds like that’s the case here. It sounds like you’re asking more for additional emotional support, and while that’s a nice thing when it’s given, it’s also not really something you can insist on.

Ultimately, they need to see that you can meet deadlines and maintain your productivity with this level of involvement from them. They’re telling you that’s what you need to demonstrate — not that you can do it if they’re more hands-on, but that you can do it when they’re not hands-on.

I’ll be blunt here because that’s probably the best way to convey this: Saying that you can “eventually” develop better habits when the stuff we’re talking about is deadlines and quantity of work output isn’t really a strong position to take. It would be reasonable if we were talking about a whole new skill you needed to learn like public speaking or Excel wizardry, but we’re talking here about baseline work ethic stuff. It’s understandable for them to want that improvement right away, and to be deeply concerned if you don’t think you can do that.

It sounds like you’ve got some hard stuff going on in your personal life, and certainly good managers will be sensitive to that. But I worry that you’re going to come across as blaming them for not helping you do something that it’s actually pretty reasonable for them to expect you’ll do on your own.

If you’re dealing with postpartum depression — and since they seem sincerely interested in a good outcome here — I wonder if a better approach would be to explain that’s really impacting your work, acknowledge that you haven’t been performing where you need to, and ask for a few months to get the PPD more under control (while actively working with a doctor). Say that you’ll be working hard on the work issues meanwhile, but that given the postpartum struggles you’re having, you’re hoping they can give you some time to work through that before drawing any final conclusions about your work.

Good luck!

is it normal to complain about coworkers behind their backs, I opened a love letter to a volunteer, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Is it normal to complain about coworkers behind their backs?

I wanted to ask about office norms when it comes to expressing irritation about colleagues. I’m currently working at my first job, and will be leaving in a couple of months due to studying. One of the things that really bothers me about this office is the amount of complaining about people behind their backs that goes on – I understand venting, but a lot of this has a really catty, high school vibe to me.

The room I work in is shared by around a dozen people, depending on the day, and often when someone leaves the room people will start criticizing them, regardless of how senior they are. The worst I’ve heard so far was someone leaving the room and someone else immediately saying “bitch.” Other comments can be things like complaining about someone’s negativity or the way they handle their boss’s requests or, it seems, everything under the sun.

I don’t participate in this, and since I’m leaving soon I’m willing to just put up with the unpleasant atmosphere it creates, but since this is my first job I’d really like to know if this is a normal thing in the workplace. Is it normal to criticize colleagues in their own office? A lot of this stuff I’d consider unpleasant but more acceptable if people did it somewhere else, over their lunch break, or if they were discussing a way to address a problem, but saying these kind of things in someone’s own office just seems kind of mean. I feel like I can’t be the only one worrying that they’re being talked about every time they go to the bathroom.

No, it’s not normal. There are certainly places where it happens, but it’s the sign of a really dysfunctional workplace. It’s a little more common to see private negativity, like one person privately complaining to a coworker about another, but it’s usually deliberately kept discreet, and that’s usually because people recognize that it isn’t okay be open about it. The type of group nastiness that you describe, where people are insulted after leaving a room? Very much not normal, and it sounds like a miserable atmosphere to work in. (And not just miserable in the “these people are jerks” sense — although that too — but constant complaining tends to make the complainers themselves significantly less happy too. )

2. Manager is in a romantic relationship with a junior staff member

My department director just promoted a man who is openly having a romantic relationship with a junior staff member. The junior staff member now comes in late, leaves early, takes long lunches in her boyfriend’s ( our department manager’s) office with the door closed and the blinds drawn, and isn’t required to enter in the staff lottery for vacation time – she’s just granted it. My department director was aware of the relationship when he made the promotion and says we all just “have to be adults” about the whole thing. Based on comments made by the junior staff member, her boyfriend has shared confidential staff files with her – everything from disciplinary documentation to medical notes and salary information. Based on her job functions, there is absolutely no reason why she should have this information, and her sharing of this confidential information has caused several people to quit.

We are a state-run facility and are due for state inspection by the end of the month. My coworkers are all recent college graduates and new in the field and they don’t want to make waves, but after ten years in this field, I know the state and the administration would be appalled. Part of our inspection includes individual performance interviews with the administration, and I plan on telling them about this issue during the interview. This little side drama has caused a drop in staff morale and has prevented us from giving our clients the attention they need. I’ve worked under my director for five years and he is generally a good boss. I want to inform him as a courtesy that I’ll be talking to the state about the manager’s relationship and the breach of confidentiality, but others feel if I warn him he’ll try and cover up the relationship and downplay my concerns to the administration. Is it unprofessional to not make my boss aware of my plans?

Nope, it’s not unprofessional, and in fact I’d recommend that you not mention it to your boss ahead of time if you believe that he’ll actively try to cover up the situation. It’s outrageous that your director knows what’s going on and says you “have to be adults about it,” when being adults about would mean recognizing that what’s happening isn’t okay and needs to be stopped. There’s a reason that dating in your chain of command is prohibited in most companies, even when the people involved handle themselves professionally; in this case, they’re not even doing that.

When you report it to the inspector — and you should — make sure to mention that your director knows and what she said about it.

Read an update to this letter here.

3. Can I ask an acquaintance about what pay range to expect in her job?

I have an upcoming interview for a position as a representative within an organization. Unsurprisingly, the pay was not listed on the job description and I was asked on the employment application for my desired salary, as well as past salaries.

In my research to ensure I am prepared for the interview and (hopefully) pay negotiation, would it be inappropriate or ill-advised to ask an acquaintance, who is currently a representative for the same organization, for an idea of what pay range to expect? If an acceptable question, how can I ask it in a tactful and tasteful way? I would not be replacing the acquaintance; there are several representatives in the organization.

Yes, that’s fine to do, and the way you’ve framed it here is good — ask for an idea of what pay range to expect rather than saying outright, “What do you make?” I’d say it like this: “I want to make sure I’m prepared for any salary discussion that comes up. If you’re comfortable with it, can you give me an idea of what pay range to expect in this position?”

4. I opened a love letter (or something) sent to a volunteer

I received a piece of mail at work addressed “care of Miller.” I have several volunteers with the last name Miller, so I opened it to see who it was sent to. It turned out to be a birthday card that said, “I love you. Please let me back into your life.” Clearly this person does not know where volunteer Miller lives. I am unsure whether to give her the card or not!

I think you need to. If this is someone who your volunteer has told to stop contacting her, she needs to know that that’s being ignored. Worst case scenario, if the person is stalking or otherwise threatening her, she needs to know that they’ve escalated to contacting her at work. And if none of those things are true and it’s a low-risk situation, by not giving it to her you’d be making a decision for her about whether it’s something she’d want to see, which you don’t really have standing to do. So yes, pass it along to her.

5. I’m an independent contractor being treated like an employee

I have a part-time job that I’ve been at for eight months. I have another full-time job and am a full-time student. I was first hired as an independent contractor and didn’t work in the office, only did off-site projects. There was one other employee with the same job description and independent contractor status. Since then, I’ve gotten two raises (which is great), and have been asked to start doing office work. Now, I spend most of my time working in their office, doing basic filing and office work. No one else is doing these projects.

Since school is out, they’ve been pushing for more and more hours from me. My full time job is remote, so I can set my own hours, so I’ve been okay with putting in more time in the office. However, when I run out of my set office work to do, instead of leaving, they want me to train with one of their full-time employees, who is not an independent contractor.

She gets her miles and expenses reimbursed and I do not, as well as receiving the tax benefits. I feel very weird about this. I realize that what I’m doing isn’t really independent contractor work, but I needed the income so I didn’t push back. Is it appropriate now to ask to be transferred into full employee status if I’m doing the exact same things as employees? Also, I don’t really want to spend time training with another employee. I already have a full-time job, and if they’re not going to make me a real employee, I don’t want to have to do the work of one.

I can’t say for sure without knowing more, but based on what you’ve said here and if you’re doing the same things as that employee, it’s very likely that you no longer qualify to be treated as an independent contractor.

It is indeed appropriate to ask to be paid as a full-time employee or to have your work return to the previous set-up. (Keep in mind, though, that converting to employee status may actually mean less pay; independent contractors are typically paid more since they’re responsible for their own payroll taxes and don’t receive benefits.)

I’d say it this way: “Our current set-up with having me do this much work in the office is starting to run afoul of the federal regulations on independent contractors. To stay compliant with the law, I think we have to either move back toward our old model for my work or convert me to employee status, which I’d be glad to discuss doing if that’s something that would make sense on your end.”